Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Leger, 936 So. 2d 108.

375 citing documents.

State v. Webb 149 So. 3d 310 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
ollowing regarding the standard for reviewing a claim of insufficient evidence: The standard of review in a sufficiency of the evidence claim is “whether, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found proof beyond a reasonable doubt of each of the essential elements of the crime charged.” State v. Leger, 05-11, p. 91 (La.7/10/06), , cert.
State v. Magee 150 So. 3d 446 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
607 , 172 L.Ed.2d 471 (2008); State v. Leger, 05-0011, p. 66 (La.7/10/06), , cert, denied, 549 U.S. 1221 , 127 S.Ct.
State v. Walter 144 So. 3d 1134 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
State v. Leger, 05-0011 (La.7/10/06), , cert, denied, 549 U.S. 1221 , 127 S.Ct.
State of Louisiana v. Ted Dwayne Stevens, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
State of Louisiana v. Tony Jackson, AKA Leoanrdo Jackson, AKA Leon Jackson, AKA Leonardo Marice Jackson, AKA Leonard … La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
State v. Jackson 146 So. 3d 631 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
The standard of review in a sufficiency of the evidence claim is “whether, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found proof beyond a reasonable doubt of each of the essential elements of the crime charged.” State v. Leger, 05-11, p. 91 (La.7/10/06), , cert.
State v. Stevens 140 So. 3d 1267 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Assignment of Error Number Three The well-settled standard of review in a sufficiency of the evidence claim is “whether, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found proof beyond a reasonable doubt of each of the essential elements of the crime charged.” State v. Leger, 05-11, p. 91 (La.7/10/06), , cert.
State of Louisiana v. Daniel Joseph Harmon La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
State of Louisiana v. Wendell Price La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
State of Louisiana v. Rodney L. Johnson, Sr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
State v. Price 139 So. 3d 1259 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
icer Cormier “began to violently strike [him] to effect the unlawful arrestf.]” The standard of review in a sufficiency of the evidence claim is “whether, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found proof beyond a reasonable doubt of each of the essential elements of the crime charged.” State v. Leger, 05-11, p. 91 (La.7/10/06), , cert.
State v. Harmon 139 So. 3d 1195 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
The standard of review in a sufficiency of the evidence claim is “whether, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found proof beyond a reasonable doubt of each of the essential elements of the crime charged.” State v. Leger, 05-11, p. 91 (La.7/10/06), , cert.
State of Louisiana v. Alcide Hypolite La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
ng a claim of insufficient evidence: The standard of review in a sufficiency of the evidence claim is “whether, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found proof beyond a reasonable doubt of each of the essential elements of the crime charged.” State v. Leger, 05–11, p. 91 (La.7/10/06), cert.
State v. Hypolite 139 So. 3d 687 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
ollowing regarding the standard for reviewing a claim of insufficient evidence: The standard of review in a sufficiency of the evidence claim is “whether, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found proof beyond a reasonable doubt of each of the essential elements of the crime charged.” State v. Leger, 05-11, p. 91 (La.7/10/06), , cert.
State of Louisiana v. Ernest R. Billiot La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
viewing a claim of insufficient evidence: The standard of review in a sufficiency of the evidence claim is “whether, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found proof beyond a reasonable doubt of each of the essential elements of the crime charged.” State v. Leger, 05-11, p. 91 (La.7/10/06), cert.
State of Louisiana v. Caleb A. Baxley La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
7/10/06), (quoting La.R.S.
State v. Baxley 139 So. 3d 556 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Further, where the conviction is based on circumstantial evidence, “assuming every fact to be proved that the evidence tends to prove[,]” the evidence must exclude every “reasonable hypothesis of innocence[.]” State v. Leger, 05-0011, p. 91 (La.7/10/06), (quoting La.R.S.
State of Louisiana v. Lantibious A. Broussard AKA Lantipious A. Broussard La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
State v. Jefferson 140 So. 3d 235 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State v. Leger, 05-0011, p. 10 (La.7/10/06), .
State v. Williams 138 So. 3d 727 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
2301, 2308 , 110 L.Ed.2d 112 (1990); State v. Leger, 05-0011 (La.7/10/06), , cert.
State v. Simmons 136 So. 3d 358 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State v. Leger, 05-0011 (La.7/10/06), -48 , cert.
State of Louisiana v. Jamaal Cole Diggs La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
State of Louisiana v. Isiah Demon Lively La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
State of Louisiana v. Sidney John Handy La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
viewing a claim of insufficient evidence: The standard of review in a sufficiency of the evidence claim is “whether, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found proof beyond a reasonable doubt of each of the essential elements of the crime charged.” State v. Leger, 05–11, p. 91 (La.7/10/06), cert.
State v. Diggs 154 So. 3d 15 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
trier of fact could have found proof beyond a reasonable doubt of each of the essential elements of the crime charged.” State v. Leger, 05-11, p. 91 (La.7/10/06), , cert.
State v. Handy 154 So. 3d 9 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
*12 ing regarding the standard for reviewing a claim of insufficient evidence: The standard of review in a sufficiency of the evidence claim is “whether, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found proof beyond a reasonable doubt of each of the essential elements of the crime charged.” State v. Leger, 05-11, p. 91 (La.7/10/06), , cert.
State v. Lively 153 So. 3d 1061 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
The standard of review in a sufficiency of the evidence claim is “whether, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found proof beyond a reasonable doubt of each of the essential elements of the crime charged.” State v. Leger, 05-11, p. 91 (La.7/10/06), , cert.
State v. Vessel 131 So. 3d 523 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
See also State v. Leger, 05-011 (La.7/10/06), (unpublished appendix ), only material or prejudicial omissions from the appellate record warrant reversal.
State v. Cole 131 So. 3d 931 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Leger, 05-0011 (La.7/10/06), , cert.
State of Louisiana v. Paul Broussard La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
State of Louisiana v. Derrick L. Harris La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
7/10/06), -43 (citing Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct.
State v. Broussard 128 So. 3d 636 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
The standard of review in a sufficiency of the evidence claim is “whether, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found proof beyond a reasonable doubt of each of the essential elements of the crime charged.” State v. Leger, 05-11, p. 91 (La.7/10/06), , ceH.
State of Louisiana v. Jessie James Duplantis La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
State v. Duplantis 127 So. 3d 143 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
The standard of review in a sufficiency of the evidence claim is “whether, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found proof beyond a reasonable doubt of each of the essential elements of the crime charged.” State v. Leger, 05-11, p. 91 (La.7/10/06), , cert.
State of Louisiana v. Corey W. Oliphant La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
State v. Oliphant 127 So. 3d 91 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
We must determine “whether, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found proof beyond a reasonable doubt of each of the essential elements of the crime charged.” State v. Leger, 05-11, p. 91 (La.7/10/06), , cert.
State of Louisiana v. William King, III La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
State v. King 124 So. 3d 623 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
The standard of review in a sufficiency of the evidence claim is “whether, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found proof beyond a reasonable doubt of each of the essential elements of the crime charged.” State v. Leger, 05-11, p. 91 (La.7/10/06), , cert.
State of Louisiana v. Robyn B. Little Davis La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
viewing a claim of insufficient evidence: The standard of review in a sufficiency of the evidence claim is “whether, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found proof beyond a reasonable doubt of each of the essential elements of the crime charged.” State v. Leger, 05-11, p. 91 (La.7/10/06), 170, cert.
State of Louisiana v. Carol Noland Saltzman La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
viewing a claim of insufficient evidence: The standard of review in a sufficiency of the evidence claim is “whether, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found proof beyond a reasonable doubt of each of the essential elements of the crime charged.” State v. Leger, 05-11, p. 91 (La.7/10/06), 170, cert.
State v. Davis 129 So. 3d 554 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
ollowing regarding the standard for reviewing a claim of insufficient evidence: The standard of review in a sufficiency of the evidence claim is “whether, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found proof beyond a reasonable doubt of each of the essential elements of the crime charged.” State v. Leger, 05-11, p. 91 (La.7/10/06), , cert.
State v. Saltzman 128 So. 3d 1060 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
ollowing regarding the standard for reviewing a claim of insufficient evidence: The standard of review in a sufficiency of the evidence claim is “whether, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found proof beyond a reasonable doubt of each of the essential elements of the crime charged.” State v. Leger, 05-11, p. 91 (La.7/10/06), , |4170, cert, denied, 549 U.S. 1221 , 127 S.Ct.
State of Louisiana v. Kevin Dee Gildhouse La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
State v. Williams 128 So. 3d 359 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Leger, 05-11 (La.7/10/06), , cert.
State v. Gildhouse 123 So. 3d 888 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
We must determine “whether, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found proof beyond a treasonable doubt of each of the essential elements of the crime charged.” State v. Leger, 05-11, p. 91 (La.7/10/06), , cert.
State v. Caliste 125 So. 3d 8 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
2243, 2254 , 53 L.Ed.2d 140 (1977); State v. Leger, 2005-0011, p. 59 (La.7/10/06), , quoting Manson .
State v. Coleman 121 So. 3d 703 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
1931 , 95 L.Ed.2d 458 (1987); State v. Leger, 05-0011 (La.7/10/06), , cert.
State v. Lewis 121 So. 3d 128 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Leger, 05-0011, p. 10 (La.7/10/06), , cert.
State of Louisiana v. Thomas Kirk Gaton La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
The standard of review in a sufficiency of the evidence claim is ―whether, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found proof beyond a reasonable doubt of each of the essential elements of the crime charged.‖ State v. Leger, 05-11, p. 91 (La.7/10/06), cert.
State of Louisiana v. Kelvin Moses La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
The standard of review in a sufficiency of the evidence claim is “whether, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found proof beyond a reasonable doubt of each of the essential elements of the crime charged.” State v. Leger, 05-11, p. 91 (La.7/10/06), cert.