Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Lee, 976 So. 2d 109.

148 citing documents.

State v. Murray 242 So. 3d 821 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
State v. Magee 243 So. 3d 151 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
State of Louisiana v. Timothy H. Queen -Aka- Timothy Hugh Queen La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
See also State v. Lee, 2005-2098 p. 42-43 (La.1/16/08), cert.
State v. Queen 237 So. 3d 547 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
State of Louisiana v. William Felix Vail La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
State v. Vail 236 So. 3d 644 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
State v. Isaac 229 So. 3d 1030 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
State v. Hankton 222 So. 3d 41 La. 2017
State v. Cooper 223 So. 3d 573 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
01/16/08), , found that the use of a buccal swab to obtain a DNA sample from an individual constituted a search.
State v. Bell 222 So. 3d 79 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
State v. Ables 213 So. 3d 477 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
1/16/08), , the Louisiana Supreme Court explained the inevitable discovery rule as follows: One of the theories courts use in addressing “fruit of the poisonous tree” issues is the inevitable discovery rule.
State v. Nelson 215 So. 3d 389 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
State v. Copelin 206 So. 3d 990 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
State v. Johnson 196 So. 3d 26 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
Our Supreme Court held in State v. Lee, 2005-2098 (La.1/16/08), : The Louisiana and Federal constitutions prohibit unreasonable searches and seizures.
State v. Freeman 194 So. 3d 1 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
State v. Lee, 05-2098 (La.1/16/08), , cert.
State v. Kennon 194 So. 3d 661 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
State v. Lee, 05-0456 (La.05/16/07), , abrogated on other grounds by State v. Lee, 05-2098 (La.01/16/08), , writ denied, 07-1288 (La.03/07/08), .
State v. Fair 182 So. 3d 1238 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
State v. Lee, 05-2098 (La.1/16/08), , cert.
State v. Rumley 183 So. 3d 640 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Const, art. I, § 16; State v. Magee, 2011-0574, p. 10 (La.9/28/12), ; State v. Lee, 2005-2098, p. 32 (La.1/16/08), .
State v. Mitchell 182 So. 3d 365 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
State v. Lee, 05-2098 (La.1/16/08), , cert.
State v. Lee 181 So. 3d 631 La. 2015
This Court affirmed his conviction and sentence on appeal, State v. Lee, 05-2098 (La.1/16/08), , and the United States Supreme Court denied certiorari.
State v. Summers 170 So. 3d 960 La. 2015
Also, while a warrant is generally required to search a home or its curtilage, “the exigencies of the situation” can “make the needs of law enforcement so compelling that the warrantless search is objectively reasonable under the Fourth Amendment” State v. Lee, 05-2098, pp. 14-15 (La.1/16/08)
State v. Waterhouse 171 So. 3d 1113 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
State v. Garcia, 2009-1578 (La.11/16/12), ; State v. Lee, 2005-2098 (La.1/16/08), .
State v. Glenn 162 So. 3d 525 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
State v. Lee, 05-2098 (La.01/16/08), , cert.
State of Louisiana v. William Felix Vail La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
State v. Vail 150 So. 3d 576 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State v. Lee, 05-2098 (La.1/16/08), .
State of Louisiana v. Ted Dwayne Stevens, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
State v. Lee, 05-2098, p. 44 (La.1/16/08), State v. Patza, 3 La.
State v. Stevens 140 So. 3d 1267 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State v. Lee, 05-2098, p. 44 (La.1/16/08), ; State v. Patza, 3 La.Ann.
State v. Altenberger 139 So. 3d 510 La. 2014
State v. Lee, 05-2098, p. 44 (La.1/16/08), ; State v. Patza, 3 La.Ann.
State v. Cope 137 So. 3d 151 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
See, for example, Magee, supra, which included extensive evidence of media coverage including 200 pages of newspaper articles, online comments from the public, transcripts of television coverage of the crime and multiple DVDs containing recordings from major local media outlets; State v. Lee, 05-2098 (La.1/16/08), , cert, denied, 555 U.S. 824 , 129 S.Ct.
State of Louisiana v. Brian Segura La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
State v. Segura 127 So. 3d 1034 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
1794 , 182 L.Ed.2d 621 (2012); State v. Lee, 05-2098, p. 32 (La.1/16/08)
State v. Walker 128 So. 3d 581 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
1/16/08), , cert, denied, 555 U.S. 824 , 129 S.Ct.
State in the Interest of N. F. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
State ex rel. N.F. 124 So. 3d 1262 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Lee, 05-2098 (La.1/16/08), .
State v. Aston 125 So. 3d 1148 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Lee, 05-2098 (La.1/16/08); , cert.
State v. Coleman 121 So. 3d 703 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
State v. Lee, 05-2098 (La.1/16/08), , cert.
State v. Buckley 120 So. 3d 819 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Lee, 2005-2098, p. 32 (La.1/16/08), .
State v. Carter 112 So. 3d 381 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
As a general rule, warrants are required to search a person’s home or his person unless “the exigencies of the situation’ make the needs of law enforcement so compelling that the warrantless search is objectively reasonable under the Fourth Amendment.” State v. Lee, 05-2098, pp. 14-15 (La.1/16/08), (Citations omitted); Mincey v. Arizona, 437 U.S. 385, 393-394 , 98 S.Ct.
State v. Grimes 109 So. 3d 1007 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Lee, 2005-2098, p. 44 (La.1/16/08), , citing La.
State v. $144,320.00 Tina Beers 105 So. 3d 694 La. 2012
recently stated probable cause exists sufficient to issue a search warrant “when the facts and circumstances within the affiant’s knowledge and of which he | ishas reasonably trustworthy information, are sufficient to support a reasonable belief that an offense has been committed and that evidence or contraband may be found at the place tu be searched.” State v. Lee, 05-2098, p. 14 (La.1/16/08), .
State v. Washington 104 So. 3d 401 La. 2012
State v. Lee, 05-2098, p. 14 (La.1/16/08), ; see U.S. Const, amend.
State v. Garcia 108 So. 3d 1 La. 2012
State v. Lee, 05-2098, p. 44 (La.1/16/08), ; State v. Patza, 3 La.
State of Louisiana v. Marqule Craft La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
State v. Craft 99 So. 3d 1108 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
15:451; [State u] Lee, 05-2098 [p. 15 (La.1/16/08), ,] 122.
State v. Magee 103 So. 3d 285 La. 2012
1794 , 182 L.Ed.2d 621 (2012); State v. Lee, 05-2098, p. 32 (La.1/16/08)
State v. Clement 101 So. 3d 460 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
“A search warrant may issue only upon probable cause established to the satisfaction of a magistrate, by the affidavit of a credible person, particularly describing the person or place to be searched and the things to be seized.” State v. Lee, 05-2098, p. 14 (La.1/16/08), cert.
State v. Bone 107 So. 3d 49 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State v. Lee, 05-2098 (La.1/16/08), .
State v. Cure 93 So. 3d 1268 La. 2012
1710, 1723 , 173 L.E.2d 485 (2009) (“Police may search a vehicle incident to a recent occupant’s arrest only if the arrestee is within reaching distance of the passenger compartment at the time of the search or it is reasonable to believe the vehicle contains evidence of the offense of arrest.”); State v. Lee, 05-2098, p. 24 (La.1/16/08), -28 (“‘Circumstances *1272 justifying application of the “inevitable discovery” rule are most likely to be present if ...
State v. Cortez 98 So. 3d 382 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State v. Lee, 05-2098, p. 14 (La.1/16/08), , cert.
State v. Banks 95 So. 3d 508 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State v. Lee, 05-2098, p. 14 (La.1/16/08), , cert.