Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Brandenburg, 949 So. 2d 625.

25 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Chad Scott La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2026
3 Cir. 2/7/07), writ denied, 07-538 (La.
State of Louisiana v. Jermaine Washington, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2025
3 Cir. 2/7/07), writ denied, 07-538 (La.
State of Louisiana v. Latracus Henry La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
3 Cir. 2/7/07) writs denied, 07-538, 07-614 (La.
State v. Henry 178 So. 3d 1134 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
3 Cir. 2/7/07) , writs denied, 07-538, 07-614 (La.10/26/07) , 573.
State of Louisiana v. Corey Joseph Craig La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
3 Cir. 2/7/07) writ denied, 07-538 (La.
State v. Craig 123 So. 3d 1239 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
3 Cir. 2/7/07) , writ denied, 07-538 (La.10/26/07), , and writ denied, 07-614 (La.10/26/07), .
State of Louisiana v. Wade A. Tolliver AKA Wade W. Tolliver, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
3 Cir. 2/7/07), writs denied, 07-538, 07-614 (La.
State v. Tolliver 157 So. 3d 674 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
3 Cir. 2/7/07), , *678 writs denied, 07-538, 07-614 (La.10/26/07), , .
State of Louisiana v. Ernest Joseph Arceneaux La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
3 Cir. 2/7/07), writs denied, 07-538, 07-614 (La.
State v. Arceneaux 111 So. 3d 1177 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
App. 3 Cir. 2/7/07), , writs denied, 07-538, 07-614 (La.10/26/07), , 573, (La.10/26/07), the defendant was convicted of aggravated burglary and sentenced to thirty years at hard labor.
State of Louisiana v. Horatio Adams La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
3 Cir. 2/7/07), - 36, writ denied, 07-538 (10/26/07), and writ denied, 07-614 (La.
State of Louisiana v. Thomas Herbert La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
3 Cir. 2/7/07), writs denied, 07-538, 07-614 (La.
State of Louisiana v. David Lynn Saucier La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
3 Cir. 2/7/07), writs denied, 07-538 (La.
State v. Saucier 81 So. 3d 691 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
3 Cir. 2/7/07), , writs denied, 07-538 (La.10/26/07), , and 07-614 (La.10/26/07), , this court noted: The trial court has wide discretion in imposing a sentence, and a sentence imposed within the statutory limits will not be deemed constitutionally excessive absent a manifest abuse of discretion.
State of Louisiana v. Jeffery Neal Deville La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
3 Cir. 2/7/07), writ denied, 07-538, 07-614 (La.
State v. DEVILLE 74 So. 3d 774 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
3 Cir. 2/7/07), , writ denied, 07-538, 07-614 (La.10/26/07), , 573, this court stated: The trial court has wide discretion in imposing a sentence, and a sentence imposed within the statutory limits will not be deemed constitutionally excessive absent a |2manifest abuse of discretion.
State of Louisiana v. Brian Keith Guilbeau La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
3 Cir. 2/7/07), writs denied, 07-538, 07-614 (La.
State of Louisiana v. Jamie Francisco La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
3 Cir. 2/7/07), writs denied, 07-538, 07-614 (La.
State v. Francisco 55 So. 3d 995 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
3 Cir. 2/7/07), , writs denied, 07-538, 07-614 (La.10/26/07), , 573, this court stated: The trial court has wide discretion in imposing a sentence, and a sentence imposed within the statutory limits will not be deemed constitutionally excessive absent a manifest abuse of discretion.
State v. Strother 25 So. 3d 253 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
3 Cir. 2/7/07), , writs denied, 07-538, 07-614 (La.
State of Louisiana v. Wilburn Strother La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
3 Cir. 2/7/07), writs denied, 07-538, 07-614 (La.
State v. CARAMANICA 5 So. 3d 1062 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
3 Cir. 2/7/07), , writ denied, 07-538 (La.
State of Louisiana v. Randall C. Curtis La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
3 Cir. 2/7/07), writs denied, 07-0538, 07-0614 (La.
State v. Curtis 987 So. 2d 294 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
3 Cir. 2/7/07), , writs denied, 07-0538, 07-0614 (La.10/26/07), , 573, this court stated: The trial court has wide discretion in imposing a sentence, and a sentence imposed within the statutory limits will not be deemed constitutionally excessive absent a manifest abuse of discretion.
State of Louisiana v. Johnny Otis Washington La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
3 Cir. 2/7/07), “‘[a]s a general rule, maximum sentences are appropriate in cases involving the most serious violation of the offense and the worst type of offender.’ State v. Hall, 35,151, p. 4 (La.App.