Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Wright v. Louisiana Power & Light, 951 So. 2d 1058.
-
Broussard v. Hertz Equipment Rental Corp.
27 So. 3d 337
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
Wright v. Louisiana Power & Light, XXXX-XXXX[,] p. 17 (La.3/9/07), ; King v. Parish National Bank, XXXX-XXXX[,] p. 7 (La.10/19/04), ; Jones v. Estate of Santiago, XXXX-XXXX[,] p. 5 (La.4/14/04), .
-
Hymel v. Discover Bank
30 So. 3d 51
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Power & Light, 06-1181 (La.3/9/07) .
-
Keith Allen Portie v. Flavin Realty, Inc.
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
3/9/07), King v. Parish National Bank, 2004-0337[,] p. 7 (La.
-
Portie v. Flavin [Realty] Inc.
22 So. 3d 1143
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Wright v. Louisiana Power & Light, 2006-1181[,] p. 17 (La.3/9/07), ; King v. Parish National *1146 Bank, 2004-0337[,] p. 7 (La.10/19/04), ; Jones v. Estate of Santiago, 2003-1424[,] p. 5 (La.4/14/04), .
-
Versluis v. GULF COAST TRANSIT CO.
17 So. 3d 459
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Wright v. Louisiana Power & Light, 2006-1181 p. 17 (La.3/9/07), ; King v. Parish National Bank, 2004-0337 p. 7 (La.10/19/04), ; Jones v. Estate of Santiago, 2003-1424 p. 5 (La.4/14/04), .
-
Tillman v. Eldridge
17 So. 3d 69
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
In Samaha, the court cited the explanation of the 1997 amendment to this article given in Wright v. Louisiana Power & Light, 2006-1181 (La.3/9/07), : This amendment, which closely parallels the language of Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317 , 106 S.Ct.
-
Marie Benniefiel v. Zurich American Insurance Company
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
Wright v. Louisiana Power & Light, 2006-1181[,] p. 17 (La.3/9/07), King v. Parish National Bank, 2004-0337[,] p. 7 (La.10/19/04), Jones v. Estate of Santiago, 2003-1424[,] p. 5 (La.4/14/04)
-
Thomas Allen v. Allstate Insurance Company
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
Wright v. Louisiana Power & Light, 2006-1181[,] p. 17 (La.3/9/07), King v. Parish National Bank, 2004-0337[,] p. 7 (La.10/19/04), Jones v. Estate of 2 Santiago, 2003-1424[,] p. 5 (La.4/14/04)
-
Benniefiel v. Zurich American Insurance
10 So. 3d 381
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Wright v. Louisiana Power & Light, 2006-1181 [,] p. 17 (La.3/9/07), ; King v. Parish National Bank, 2004-0337[,] p. 7 (La.10/19/04), ; Jones v. Estate of Santiago, 2003-1424[,] p. 5 (La.4/14/04), .
-
Allen v. Allstate Insurance Co.
10 So. 3d 374
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Wright v. Louisiana Power & Light, 2006-1181[,] p. 17 (La.3/9/07), ; King v. Parish National Bank, 2004-0337[,] p. 7 (La.10/19/04), ; Jones v. Estate of Santiago, 2003 — 1424[,] p. 5 (La.4/14/04), .
-
R.I. Lucien Tile Co. ex rel. Cage v. American Security Insurance
8 So. 3d 753
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Samaha v. Rau, 2007-1726 p. 1-2 (La.2/26/08), -883 ; Wright v. Louisiana Power & Light, 2006-1181 p. 17 (La.3/9/07), ; King v. Parish National Bank, 2004-0337 p. 7 (La.10/19/04), ; Jones v. Estate of Santiago, 2003-1424 p. 5 (La.4/14/04), .
-
Schmidt v. Schmidt
6 So. 3d 197
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
As stated by the Supreme Court in Wright v. Louisiana Power and Light, 2006-1181 (La.3/9/07), : A cause of action, when used in the context of the peremptory exception, is defined as the operative facts that give rise to the plaintiffs right to judicially assert the action against the defendant.
-
Harry John Walsh, Jr. v. Dr. Jason Morris
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
Wright v. Louisiana Power & Light, 2006-1181 p. 17 (La.3/9/07), King v. Parish National Bank, 2004-0337 p. 7 (La.10/19/04), Jones v. Estate of Santiago, 2003-1424 p. 5 (La.4/14/04)
-
Walsh v. Morris
999 So. 2d 1261
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
Wright v. Louisiana Power & Light, XXXX-XXXX p. 17 (La.3/9/07), ; King v. Parish National Bank, XXXX-XXXX p. 7 (La.10/19/04), ; Jones v. Estate of Santiago, XXXX-XXXX p. 5 (La.4/14/04), .
-
Cyprien v. BD. OF SUP'RS EX REL. U. OF LA.
5 So. 3d 862
La. 2009
Wright v. Louisiana Power & Light, 06-1181 (La.3/9/07), ; Babin v. Winn-Dixie Louisiana, 00-0078 (La.6/30/00), .
-
Passaro v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
4 So. 3d 158
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Wright v. Louisiana Power & Light, 06-1181 p. 17 (La.3/9/07), .
-
Paragon Lofts Condominium Owners Ass'n v. Paragon Lofts, L.L.C.
1 So. 3d 753
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
Wright v. Louisiana Power & Light, 06-1181, p. 17 (La.3/9/07), .
-
Larkins v. David Wilkerson Construction
3 So. 3d 67
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
Wright v. Louisiana Power & Light, 06-1181, p. 17 (La.3/9/07), .
-
Elvist J. Tabor, Sr. v. Anco Insulations, Inc.
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
Wright v. Louisiana Power & Light, 2006-1181[,] p. 17 (La.3/9/07), King v. Parish National Bank, 2004-0337[,] p. 7 (La.10/19/04), Jones v. Estate of Santiago, 2003-1424[,] p. 5 (La.4/14/04)
-
Tabor v. Anco Insulations, Inc.
999 So. 2d 258
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
Wright v. Louisiana Power & Light, XXXX-XXXX[,] p. 17 (La.3/9/07), ; King v. Parish National Bank, XXXX-XXXX[,] p. 7 (La.10/19/04), ; Jones v. Estate of Santiago, XXXX-XXXX[,] p. 5 (La.4/14/04), .
-
Ronald Joseph McDowell v. Primeaux Landz, LLC
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
Wright v. Louisiana Power & Light, 2006-1181[,] p. 17 (La.3/9/07), King v. Parish National Bank, 2004-0337[,] p. 7 (La.10/19/04), Jones v. Estate of Santiago, 2003-1424[,] p. 5 (La.4/14/04)
-
McDowell v. PRIMEAUX LANDZ, LLC
998 So. 2d 339
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
Wright v. Louisiana Power & Light, XXXX-XXXX[,] p. 17 (La.3/9/07), ; King v. Parish National Bank, XXXX-XXXX[,] p. 7 (La.10/19/04), ; Jones v. Estate of Santiago, XXXX-XXXX[,] p. 5 (La.4/14/04), .
-
Johnson v. Cain
999 So. 2d 51
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
Wright v. Louisiana Power & Light, XXXX-XXXX, p. 12 (La.3/9/07), .
-
Justiss Oil Company, Inc. v. Leon Hanson
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
3/9/07), King v. Parish National Bank, 2004-0337[,] p. 7 (La.10/19/04), Jones v. Estate of Santiago, 2003-1424[,] p. 5 (La.4/14/04)
-
JUSTISS OIL CO., INC. v. Hanson
996 So. 2d 545
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
Wright v. Louisiana Power & Light, XXXX-XXXX[,] p. 17 (La.3/9/07), ; King v. Parish National Bank, XXXX-XXXX[,] p. 7 (La.10/19/04), ; Jones v. Estate of Santiago, XXXX-XXXX[,] p. 5 (La.4/14/04), .
-
Mike v. Bob's Painting
995 So. 2d 43
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
Wright v. Louisiana Power & Light, 2006-1181, p. 12 (La.3/9/07), .
-
McDaniel v. CHARITY HOS. AND MEDICAL CENTER
991 So. 2d 1138
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
Wright v. Louisiana Power & Light, 06-1181, p. 17 (La.3/9/07), ; King v. Parish Nat'l Bank, 04-0337, p. 7 (La.10/19/04), .
-
Phil D. Mayers, Jr. v. Sonny Marmet
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
Wright v. Louisiana Power & Light, 2006-1181[,] p. 17 (La.3/9/07), King v. Parish National Bank, 2004-0337[,] p. 7 (La.10/19/04), Jones v. Estate of Santiago, 2003-1424[,] p. 5 (La.4/14/04)
-
Mayers v. Marmet
985 So. 2d 315
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
Wright v. Louisiana Power & Light, XXXX-XXXX[,] p. 17 (La.3/9/07), ; King v. Parish National Bank, XXXX-XXXX[,] p. 7 (La.10/19/04), ; Jones v. Estate of Santiago, XXXX-XXXX[,] p. 5 (La.4/14/04), .
-
Samaha v. Rau
977 So. 2d 880
La. 2008
Wright v. Louisiana Power & Light, XXXX-XXXX p. 17 (La.3/9/07), ; King v. Parish National Bank, XXXX-XXXX p. 7 (La.10/19/04), ; Jones v. Estate of Santiago, XXXX-XXXX p. 5 (La.4/14/04), .
- Richard Hargett v. Estate of Daniel N. Hargett, Sr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
- Hargett v. ESTATE OF HARGETT 977 So. 2d 311 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
- Minton v. LONG'S PREFERRED PRODUCTS, INC. 977 So. 2d 310 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
- Linda K. Minton v. Long's Preferred Products, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
-
Straughter v. Hodnett
975 So. 2d 81
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
Wright v. Louisiana Power & Light, XXXX-XXXX (La.3/9/07), ; Johnson v. Unopened Succession of Alfred Covington, Jr. 42,488 (La.App.2d Cir.10/31/07), .
-
Perdigao v. Delta Airlines, Inc.
973 So. 2d 33
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
Power & Light, XXXX-XXXX (La.3/9/07), -69 .
-
Century Ready Mix Corp. v. Boyte
968 So. 2d 893
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
art. 931; Wright v. Louisiana Power and Light, 06-1181 (La.3/9/07), ; Birdsong, supra .
-
Meckstroth v. La. Dept. of Transp. and Dev.
962 So. 2d 490
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
Fink v. Bryant, 01-0987, p. 4 (La.11/28/01), ; Wright v. Louisiana Power & Light, 06-1181, p. 8 (La.3/9/07), , 1069 In his amended petition, Mr. Meckstroth states that he (his home) was identified by DOTD as a receiver of sufficient noise to warrant a sound barrier; that such a barrier would be reasonable to build; but, that because the area which included Mr. Meckstroth's home was of low population density, building a sound