DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Wright v. Louisiana Power & Light, 951 So. 2d 1058.

238 citing documents.

  • Wayne Guillot, Et Ux. v. Reece Guillot La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
    Wright v. Louisiana Power & Light, 2006-1181[,] p. 17 (La.3/9/07), King v. Parish National Bank, 2004-0337[,] p. 7 (La.10/19/04), Jones v. Estate of Santiago, 2003-1424[,] p. 5 (La.4/14/04)
  • Lynton O. Hester, IV v. Burns Builders La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
    3/9/07), (quoting Babin v. Winn-Dixie Louisiana, Inc., 00-78 (La.
  • Guillot v. Guillot 92 So. 3d 1212 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    Wright v. Louisiana Power & Light, 2006-1181[,] p. 17 (La.3/9/07), ; King v. Parish National Bank, 2004-0337[,] p. 7 (La.10/19/04), ; Jones v. Estate of Santiago, 2003-1424[,] p. 5 (La.4/14/04), .
  • Hester v. Burns Builders 92 So. 3d 641 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    |sDiscussion In Wright v. Louisiana Power & Light, 06-1181, p. 16 (La.3/9/07), (quoting Babin v. Winn-Dixie Louisiana, Inc., 00-78 (La.6/30/00), ), the supreme court discussed the standard for granting a motion for summary judgment, stating: A motion for summary judgment will be granted “if the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, togethe
  • Ultra Pure Water Technologies, Inc. v. Standex International Corp. D/B/A Master-Bilt La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
    Wright v. Louisiana Power & Light, [06-1181 (La.3/9/07) ], [ ]; King v. Parish National Bank, [04-337 (La.10/19/04) ], Jones v. Estate of Santiago, [03-1424 (La.4/14/04) ], [.]
  • Ultra Pure Water Technologies, Inc. v. Standex International Corp. 89 So. 3d 1282 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    Wright v. Louisiana Power & Light, [06-1181 (La.3/9/07) ], [ ]; King v. Parish National Bank, [04-337 (La.10/19/04) ], ; Jones v. Estate of Santiago, [03-1424 (La.4/14/04) ], [.]
  • Johnson v. Super 8 Lodge-Shreveport 92 So. 3d 519 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
    Samaha v. Rau, supra; Wright v. Louisiana Power & Light, 2006-1181 (La.3/9/07), .
  • Biggs v. Hatter 91 So. 3d 1148 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
    1982); Wright v. Louisiana Power & Light, 2006-1181 (La.3/9/07), .
  • Loftus v. Kuyper 87 So. 3d 963 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
    Samaha v. Rau, supra; Wright v. Louisiana Power & Light, 06-1181 (La.3/9/07), .
  • Brooks v. Minnieweather 86 So. 3d 684 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
    Wright v. Louisiana Power & Light, 06-1181 (La.3/9/07), .
  • Oubre v. Louisiana Citizens Fair Plan 79 So. 3d 987 La. 2011
    “At that point, the party who bears the burden of persuasion at trial (usually the plaintiff) must come forth with evidence (affidavits or discovery responses) which demonstrates he or she will be able to meet the burden at trial.” Samaha , 07-1726 at p. 4, 977 So.2d at 883 (quoting Wright v. Louisiana Power & Light, 06-1181, p. 16 (La.3/9/07), -70 ).
  • Zeitoun v. City of New Orleans 81 So. 3d 66 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    Wright v. Louisiana Power & Light, 06-1181, p. 15 (La.3/9/07), .
  • Succession of Horrell 79 So. 3d 1162 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    Wright v. Louisiana Power & Light, 06-1181, pp. 14-15 (La.3/9/07), .
  • Fox v. Reynolds Industrial Contractors, Inc. 79 So. 3d 1140 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
    Wright v. Louisiana Power & Light, 06-1181 (La.3/9/07), .
  • Mobile-One Auto Sound, Inc. v. Whitney National Bank 78 So. 3d 807 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    Wright v. Louisiana Power & Light, 2006-1181, p. 15 (La.3/9/07), , citing Ramey v. DeCaire, 03-1299, p. 8 (La.3/19/04), -19 .
  • Slade v. State ex rel. University of Louisiana at Monroe 79 So. 3d 463 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
    University of Louisiana System, 08-1067 (La.01/21/09), ; Wright v. Louisiana Power & Light, 06-1181 (La.03/09/07), .
  • Christopher Atherton v. Anthony J. Palermo, Sr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
    (quoting Wright v. Louisiana Power & Light, 06–1181, p. 16 (La.3/9/07), –70).
  • Atherton v. Palermo 76 So. 3d 1253 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    (quoting Wright v. Louisiana Power & Light, 06-1181, p. 16 (La.3/9/07), -70 ).
  • State ex rel. D.E. 83 So. 3d 8 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
    Wright v. Louisiana Power & Light, 06-1181 (La.3/9/07), .
  • Brandon Jagneaux v. Ronald R. Frohn La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
    Wright v. Louisiana Power & Light, [06-1181 (La.3/9/07)], [ ]; King v. Parish National Bank, [04-337 (La.10/19/04)], Jones v. Estate of Santiago, [03-1424 (La.4/14/04)], [.]
  • Jagneaux v. Frohn 74 So. 3d 309 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    Wright v. Louisiana Power & Light, [06-1181 (La.3/9/07) ], [ ]; King v. Parish National Bank, [04-337 (La.10/19/04) ], ; Jones v. Estate of Santiago, [03-1424 (La.4/14/04) ], [.]
  • Bogues v. Louisiana Energy Consultants, Inc. 71 So. 3d 1128 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
    Scheffler v. Adams and Reese, LLP, 06-1774 (La.2/22/07), ; Wright v. Louisiana Power & Light, 06-1181 (La.3/9/07), .
  • Glasgow v. PAR MINERALS CORP. 70 So. 3d 765 La. 2011
    Therefore, it is not necessary for a plaintiff to plead the theory of his case in the petition.” Wright v. Louisiana Power & Light, 2006-1181, p. 15 (La.3/9/07), , citing LSA-C.C.P.
  • Robinson v. Nunly 69 So. 3d 631 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
    Scheffler v. Adams and Reese, LLP, 06-1774 (La.02/22/07), ; Wright v. Louisiana Power & Light, 06-1181 (La.03/09/07), .
  • Carolyn Plummer Sheridan v. Tommy Gordon Cassel La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
    3/9/07)], []; King v. Parish National Bank, [04-0337 (La.
  • Sheridan v. Cassel 70 So. 3d 89 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    Wright v. Louisiana Power & Light, [06-1181 (La.3/9/07) ], [ ]; King v. Parish National Bank, [04-0337 (La.10/19/04) ], [ ]; Jones v. Estate of Santiago, [03-1424 (La.4/14/04) ], [.]
  • Richard v. SUPREME SUGAR CO., INC. 71 So. 3d 338 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    Wright v. Louisiana Power & Light, 06-1181 (La.3/9/07), .
  • Frederick Kirk D/B/A Exactax v. Interface Security System, LLC La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
    Wright v. Louisiana Power & Light, [06-1181 (La.3/9/07)], [ ]; King v. Parish National Bank, [04-337 (La.10/19/04)], Jones v. Estate of Santiago, [03-1424 (La.4/14/04) ], [.]
  • Isadore v. Interface Security Systems 58 So. 3d 1071 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    Wright v. Louisiana Power & Light, [06-1181 (La.3/9/07) ], []; King v. Parish National Bank, [04-337 (La.10/19/04) ], ; Jones v. Estate of Santiago, [03-1424 (La.4/14/04) ], [.]
  • Ladner v. Trinity Group, Ltd. 57 So. 3d 1197 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
    Samaha v. Rau, supra; Wright v. Louisiana Power & Light, 06-1181 (La.3/9/07), .
  • James Ronald Savoie v. Romel Charles La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
    3/9/07), -69 (quoting Ramey v. DeCaire, 03-1299, pp. 7-8 (La.
  • Sharon Lecroy v. Byrd Regional Hospital La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
    3/9/07)], []; King v. Parish National 20 Bank, [04-337 (La.
  • LeCroy v. Byrd Regional Hospital 56 So. 3d 1167 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    Wright v. Louisiana Power & Light, [06-1181 (La.3/9/07) ], [ ]; King v. Parish National Bank, [04-337 (La.10/19/04) ], ; Jones v. Estate of Santiago, [03-1424 (La.4/14/04) ], [.]
  • Savoie v. Charles 55 So. 3d 1029 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
    DISCUSSION Our supreme court discussed the exception of no cause of action in Wright v. Louisiana Power & Light, 06-1181, pp. 14-15 (La.3/9/07), -69 (quoting Ramey v. DeCaire, 03-1299, pp. 7-8 (La.3/19/04), -19 ): Is A cause of action, when used in the context of the peremptory exception, is defined as the operative facts that give rise to the plaintiffs right to judicially assert the action against the defendant.
  • Cadle Co. v. Henson 57 So. 3d 458 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
    Wright v. Louisiana Power & Light, 06-1181 (La.3/9/07), .
  • Duckworth Properties, L.L.C. v. Williams 52 So. 3d 287 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2010
    STANDARD OF REVIEW “Trial courts are permitted discretion in deciding when a judgment should be annulled because of fraud or ill practices, to which discretion reviewing courts will defer.” Wright v. Louisiana Power & Light, 06-1181, p. 12 (La.3/9/07), .
  • Derrick Gabriel v. Louisiana Organ Procurement Agency La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
    3/9/07)], []; King v. Parish National Bank, [04-337 (La.
  • Gabriel v. Louisiana Organ Procurement Agency 48 So. 3d 1192 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    Wright v. Louisiana Power & Light, [06-1181 (La.3/9/07)], [ ]; King v. Parish National Bank, [04-337 (La.10/19/04)], ; Jones v. Estate of Santiago, [03-1424 (La.4/14/04)], [.]
  • Succession of Simon Harrell and Clara Harrell v. Erris-Omega Plantation, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
  • Shane Kerry v. Charles Pearson, M.D. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
    3/9/07)], []; King v. Parish National Bank, [04-337 (La.
  • Kerry v. Pearson 40 So. 3d 463 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    Wright v. Louisiana Power & Light, [06-1181 (La.3/9/07) ], [ ]; King v. Parish National Bank, [04-337 (La.10/19/04) ], ; Jones v. Estate of Santiago, [03-1424 (La.4/14/04) ], [.]
  • Succession of Harrell v. Erris-Omega Plantation, Inc. 41 So. 3d 1215 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    Power & Light, 06-1181 (La.3/9/07), .
  • Phillips v. Gibbs 39 So. 3d 795 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    Wright v. Louisiana Power & Light, 06-1181, p. 15 (La.3/9/07), .
  • Lingoni v. Hibernia National Bank 33 So. 3d 372 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    991 (citing Wright v. Louisiana Power & Light, 06-1181 (La.3/9/07), ; Babin v. Winn-Dixie Louisiana, 00-0078 (La.6/30/00), ).
  • Paragon Lofts Condominium Owners Ass'n v. Paragon Lofts, LLC 32 So. 3d 303 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    Wright v. Louisiana Power & Light, 06-1181, p. 17 (La.3/9/07), .
  • Scientific Drilling International,inc. v. Lafayette Parish School Board Sales Tax Division La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
    Wright v. Louisiana Power & Light, 2006-1181[,] p. 17 (La.3/9/07), King v. Parish 2 National Bank, 2004-0337[,] p. 7 (La.10/19/04), Jones v. Estate of Santiago, 2003-1424[,] p. 5 (La.4/14/04)
  • Scientific Drilling International, Inc. v. Meche 29 So. 3d 1283 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    Wright v. Louisiana Power & Light, 2006-1181[,] p. 17 (La.3/9/07), ; King v. Parish National Bank, 2004-0337[,] p. 7 (La.10/19/04), ; Jones v. Estate of Santiago, 2003—1424[,] p. 5 (La.4/14/04), .
  • Prejean v. Guillory 28 So. 3d 1174 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    See Wright v. Louisiana Power & Light, 06-1181 (La.3/9/07), .
  • Kathy Prejean v. Walter Guillory La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
  • Charlotte Broussard v. Hertz Equipment Rental Corporation La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
    3/9/07), King v. Parish National Bank, 2004-0337[,] p. 7 (La.