Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Southeast Wireless v. US Telemetry, 954 So. 2d 120.

18 citing documents.

Jonathan Murray v. Universal Parking and Transportation, LLC La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2025
State of Louisiana, by and Through Its Attorney General, Liz Murrill v. Abbvie, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2025
Kimberly L. Robinson, Secretary of the Department of Revenue, State of Louisiana v. Jeopardy Productions, Inc. La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2020
Daniel E. Bannister v. SFB Companies, Inc. of Delaware La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
Daniel E. Bannister v. SFB Companies, Inc. of Delaware La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
Crosstex Energy Servs., LP v. Tex. Brine Co. 253 So. 3d 806 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
Delahoussaye v. Boelter 199 So. 3d 633 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
Southeast Wireless Network, Inc. v. U.S. Telemetry Corp., 06-1736 (La.4/11/07), .
Huey Leger, Et Ux. v. Icl America Limited La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
4/11/07), -25 (alteration in original), wherein it stated: The Louisiana long-arm statute, La.
Leger v. ICL America Ltd. 175 So. 3d 1084 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
The supreme court set forth the law relative to personal jurisdiction issues in Southeast Wireless Network, Inc. v. U.S. Telemetry Corp., 06-1736, pp. 3-6 (La.4/11/07), -25 (alteration in original), wherein it stated: The Louisiana long-arm statute, La.
NorthShore Regional Medical Center, L.L.C. v. Dill 94 So. 3d 155 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Southeast Wireless Network, Inc. v. U.S. Telemetry Corp., 2006-1736 (La.4/11/07), ; Broussard v. Diamond Aircraft Industries, Inc., 2010-1611 (La.App.
Broussard v. Diamond Aircraft Industries, Inc. 65 So. 3d 187 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
13:3201 B. The Louisiana Supreme Court, citing the official comments to the act, stated that Section B was added in 1987 “to ensure that jurisdiction under the long-arm statute extended to the limits allowed by due process.” Southeast Wireless Network, Inc. v. U.S. Telemetry Corp., 06-1736, p. 4 (La.4/11/07) .
LaRocca's Auto Sales Floorplan, Inc. v. Shelton 27 So. 3d 953 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
| r)The Courts have held that the minimum contacts prong is satisfied “by a single act or actions by which the defendant ‘purposefully avails itself of the privilege of conducting activities within the forum state, thus invoking the benefits and protections of its laws.’ ” Southeast Wireless Network, Inc. v. U.S. Telemetry Corp., 06-1786, p. 4 (La.4/11/07), , citing Burger King Corp. v. Rudzewicz, 471 U.S. 462, 475 , 105 S.Ct.
Puckett v. ADVANCE SPORTS, INC. 24 So. 3d 1033 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Geralyn Adgia Lambert Hartman v. Wesley Wood Lambert La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
Hartman v. Lambert 7 So. 3d 758 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2009
Southeast Wireless Network, Inc. v. U.S. Telemetry Coup., 06-1736 (La.4/11/07), .
Bridges v. Mosaic Global Holdings, Inc. 23 So. 3d 305 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
Southeast Wireless Network, Inc. v. U.S. Telemetry Corp., 06-1736, p. 6 (La.4/11/07), .
Ruppert v. George Kellett & Sons, Inc. 996 So. 2d 501 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
Southeast Wireless Network, Inc. v. U.S. Telemetry Corp., 06-1736, p. 4 (La.4/11/07), , 125 citing Burger King Corp. v. Rudzewicz, 471 U.S. 462, 475 , 105 S.Ct.
Martin-Creech v. Armstrong 965 So. 2d 624 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
Southeast Wireless Network, Inc. v. U.S. Telemetry Corp., U.S., 06-1736 (La.4/11/07), (citations omitted).