Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Scheffler v. Adams and Reese, LLP, 950 So. 2d 641.

136 citing documents.

Succession of Carroll 72 So. 3d 384 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
Scheffler v. Adams & Reese, LLP, 2006-1774 (La.2/22/07), .
Robinson v. Nunly 69 So. 3d 631 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
Scheffler v. Adams and Reese, LLP, 06-1774 (La.02/22/07), ; Wright v. Louisiana Power & Light, 06-1181 (La.03/09/07), .
Ttv, LLC v. David B. Simmons La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
TTV, L.L.C. v. Simmons 58 So. 3d 684 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
“As a basic proposition, for a fiduciary duty to exist, there must be a fiduciary relationship between the parties.” Scheffler v. Adams and Reese, L.L.P., 06-1774, p. 6 (La.2/22/07), .
Lange v. Orleans Levee District 56 So. 3d 925 La. 2010
Scheffler v. Adams, 2006-1774 (La.2/22/07); .
David v. Velsicol Chem. Corp. 49 So. 3d 997 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
See also Scheffler v. Adams and Reese, LLP, 06-1774 (La.2/22/07), .
Willie J. Zeno, Sr. v. Charles J. Foret La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
Furthermore, in Scheffler v. Adams and Reese, LLP, 06-1774, pp. 13-15 (La.2/22/07), -52 (footnotes omitted) our supreme court, in addressing the relationship between attorneys and clients, stated: Louisiana law recognizes that an attorney's paramount duty is, and must be, to his client.
Jane Doe v. Scott M. Hawkins La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
Doe v. Hawkins 42 So. 3d 1000 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Const, art. II, §§ 1, 2.” Scheffler v. Adams & Reese, LLP, 06-1774, p. 13 (La.2/22/07), .
Hospitality Consultants, LLC v. Angeron 41 So. 3d 1236 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
“As a basic proposition, for a fiduciary duty to exist, there must be a fiduciary relationship between the parties.” Scheffler v. Adams and Reese, L.L.P., 2006-1774, p. 6 (La.2/22/07), .
Daigle v. Jefferson Parish Council 40 So. 3d 1063 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2010
Scheffler v. Adams and Reese, LLP, 06-1774, p. 5 (La.2/22/07), .
EAST BATON ROUGE PARISH SEWERAGE COMMISSION v. Banks 34 So. 3d 1166 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Belton v. Baehr 34 So. 3d 903 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Scheffler v. Adams and Reese, LLP, 06-1774 (La.2/22/07), .
State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Jimmy Charles Bosley La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
2/22/07), Fink, 801 So.2d at 348.
State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Bosley 30 So. 3d 287 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
2/22/07), ; Fink, 801 So.2d at 348 .
Gipson v. Fortune 30 So. 3d 1076 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
Veroline v. Priority One EMS, 09-1040 (La.10/09/09), ; Scheffler v. Adams and Reese, LLP, 06-1774 (La.02/22/07), .
Pearl River Basin Land & Development Co. v. State Ex Rel. Governor's Office of Homeland Security & Emergency … 29 So. 3d 589 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Scheffler v. Adams and Reese, LLP, 06-1774, p. 5 (La.2/22/07), .
Veroline v. Priority One EMS 18 So. 3d 1273 La. 2009
Scheffler v. Adams and Reese, LLP, 06-1774 (La.2/22/07), .
Priola Construction Corporation v. Profast Development Group, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
2/22/07), -48: A fiduciary relationship has been described as “one that exists ‘when confidence is reposed on one side and there is resulting superiority and influence on the other.’” Plaquemines Parish Commission Council v. Delta Development Company, Inc.
Priola Construction Corp. v. Profast Development Group, Inc. 21 So. 3d 456 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
This conclusion is supported by the supreme court’s definition of “fiduciary” as found in Scheffler v. Adams and Reese, LLP, 06-1774, pp. 6-7 (La.2/22/07), , 647-48: A fiduciary relationship has been described as “one that exists ‘when confidence is reposed on one side and there is resulting superiority and influence on the other.’ ” Plaquemines Parish Commission Council v. Delta Development Company, Inc., quoting Toombs v. Daniels, 361 N.
La. State Bar Ass'n v. CARR AND ASSOCIATES 15 So. 3d 158 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Scheffler v. Adams and Reese, LLP, 06-1774 (La.2/22/07), .
Taylor v. Babin 13 So. 3d 633 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
See Scheffler v. Adams and Reese, LLP, 2006-1774, pp. 13-14 (La.2/22/07), -652 , and the cases cited therein.
Security Plus, Inc. v. Louisiana State Police-Gaming License Section 9 So. 3d 1013 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
No Cause of Action “The purpose of the peremptory exception of no cause of action is to test the legal sufficiency of the petition by determining whether the law affords a remedy on the facts alleged in the petition.” Scheffler v. Adams and Reese, LLP, 06-1774 (La.2/22/07), .
Bryan D. Scofield, Inc. v. Susan A. Daigle, Ltd. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
2/22/07), -47(case citations omitted).
Bryan D. Scofield, Inc. v. Susan A. Daigle, Ltd. 999 So. 2d 311 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
Scheffler v. Adams and Reese, LLP, 06-1774, pp. 4-5 (La.2/22/07), -47 (case citations omitted).
Novelaire Technologies, LLC v. Harrison 994 So. 2d 57 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
Plaquemines Parish Commission Council v. Delta Development Company, Inc., Scheffler v. Adams and Reese, LLP, 06-1774 (La.2/22/07), .
Narriman Fakier v. State of La., Board of Supervisory for Univ. of La. System La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
Fakier v. STATE, BD. OF SUP'RS FOR UNIV. 983 So. 2d 1024 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
Scheffler v. Adams and Reese, LLP, 06-1774 (La.2/22/07), .
Becnel v. Grodner 982 So. 2d 891 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
Recently, the Louisiana Supreme court held in Scheffler v. Adams & Reese, LLP, 06-1774 (La.2/22/07), , that there is no cause of action between co-counsel based on a theory that co-counsel have a fiduciary duty to one another to protect the other's interest in a fee.
Teague v. St. Paul Fire and Marine Ins. Co. 974 So. 2d 1266 La. 2008
Scheffler v. Adams and Reese, LLP, 06-1774, p. 13 (La.2/22/07), .
Elta Moss v. Winfred Thomas Barrett III La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
Based on the principle of undivided loyalty embodied in the Rules of Professional Conduct, the Louisiana Supreme Court has “adopted the traditional, majority view that an attorney does not owe a legal duty to his client’s adversary when acting on his client’s behalf.” Scheffler v. Adams and Reese, LLP, 06-1774, p. 14 (La.2/22/07)
Moss v. Barrett 977 So. 2d 310 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
Scheffler v. Adams and Reese, LLP, 06-1774, p. 14 (La.2/22/07), .
Omega Pain Mgmt. v. Omega Inst. of Health 975 So. 2d 48 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
[7] Scheffler v. Adams and Reese, LLP, XXXX-XXXX (La.2/22/07), .
Sampson v. DCI of Alexandria 970 So. 2d 55 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
Scheffler v. Adams and Reese, LLP, 06-1774, pp. 6-7 (La.2/22/07), -48 .
Mark Sampson v. Dci of Alexandria, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
Brookewood v. Sixty-Three Twenty-Four 958 So. 2d 1200 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
Scheffler v. Adams and Reese, LLP, 06-1774, p. 14 (La.2/22/07), .