Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Duncan v. USAA Ins. Co., 950 So. 2d 544.

434 citing documents.

Patricia Ashmore v. Stephen P. McBride La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
11/29/06), the supreme court observed that strong public policy is embodied in the UM coverage statute and that the statute is to be liberally construed, which “requires the statutory exceptions to coverage be interpreted strictly.” For these reasons, “the insurer bears the burden of proving any insured named in the pol
Ashmore v. McBride 11 So. 3d 720 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Insurance Co., 06-363, p. 4 (La.11/29/06), , the supreme court observed that strong public policy is embodied in the UM coverage statute and that the statute is to be liberally construed, which “requires the statutory exceptions to coverage be interpreted strictly.” For these reasons, “the insurer bears the burden of proving any insured named in the polic
Cutsinger v. Redfern 12 So. 3d 945 La. 2009
Co., 06-0363, p. 4 (La.11/29/06), .
Lynch v. Kennard 12 So. 3d 944 La. 2009
Co., 06-363, p. 11-12 (La.2/16/07), .
Banquer v. Guidroz 8 So. 3d 559 La. 2009
Co., 06-363, p. 11-12 (La.11/29/06), ).
Marie Benniefiel v. Zurich American Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
Co., 2006-363[,] p. 3 (La.11/29/06), see [La.Code Civ.P.]
Thomas Allen v. Allstate Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
Co., 2006-363[,] p. 3 (La.11/29/06), see [La.Code Civ.P.]
Benniefiel v. Zurich American Insurance 10 So. 3d 381 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Co., 2006-363[,] p. 3 (La.11/29/06), , see [La.Code Civ.P.]
Allen v. Allstate Insurance Co. 10 So. 3d 374 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Co., 2006-363[,] p. 3 (La.11/29/06), , see [La.Code Civ.P.]
National Interstate Insurance v. Collins 9 So. 3d 881 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
National Interstate Insurance v. Plain 12 So. 3d 973 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Co., 2006-363 (La.11/29/06), , are satisfied.
Theodore E. Filipski, III v. Imperial Fire and Casualty Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
Co., 06-363 (La.11/29/06)
Wart v. Progressive Security Insurance Co. 7 So. 3d 865 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
Co., 2006-363 (La.11/29/06), , the trial court found Peterson’s UM rejection form in this case was incomplete and invalid.
Filipski v. Imperial Fire & Casualty Insurance 9 So. 3d 1065 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Co., 06-363 (La.11/29/06), .
King v. Illinois National Insurance 9 So. 3d 780 La. 2009
Co., 06-0363, p. 4 (La.11/29/06), -547 .
Dixon v. DIRECT GENERAL INS. CO. OF LA. 12 So. 3d 357 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Co., 06-363 (La.11/29/06), , are met, the absence of the insurance company's name from the form does not render it invalid, despite the language of Louisiana Insurance Rating Commission ("LIRC") Bulletin 98-01.
Dixon v. Direct General Insurance Co. of Louisiana 12 So. 3d 357 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Co., 06-863 (La.11/29/06), , are met, the absence of the insurance company’s name from the form does not render it invalid, despite the language of Louisiana Insurance Rating Commission (“LIRC”) Bulletin 98-01.
Gingles v. Dardenne 4 So. 3d 799 La. 2009
In response, Ace American filed a cross-motion for summary judgment claiming Novartis had validly waived UM coverage by complying with all of the explicit guidelines set forth in Duncan v. U.S.A.A., 06-363, p. 12 (La.11/29/06), , 546-547 for a complete rejection of UM coverage.
R.I. Lucien Tile Co. ex rel. Cage v. American Security Insurance 8 So. 3d 753 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Co., 2006-363 p. 3 (La.11/29/06), , See La.
Samuel Tate v. Unitrin Auto and Home Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
Tate v. Unitrin Auto & Home Insurance Co. 5 So. 3d 1014 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
The plaintiff appeals, contending that the UM rejection form at issue does not comport with the requirements discussed in Duncan v. U.S.A.A., 06-368 (La.11/29/06), .
Harper v. Direct General Insurance Co. 2 So. 3d 418 La. 2009
Co., 06-0363 (La.11/29/06), , we identified six tasks which are required in order to complete the UM rejection form prescribed by the Commissioner of Insurance: Before we determine whether the statute requires that all aspects of the form be complied with, let us now consider what the prescribed form entails.
Normand v. NATIONAL AUTOMOTIVE INSURANCE CO. 999 So. 2d 1262 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
Harry John Walsh, Jr. v. Dr. Jason Morris La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
Co., 2006-363 p. 3 (La.11/29/06), see La.
Tina Normand v. National Automotive Insurance Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
Walsh v. Morris 999 So. 2d 1261 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
Guthrie v. Breaux 8 So. 3d 643 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Insurance Company, 2006-363 (La.11/29/06), .
Passaro v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 4 So. 3d 158 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Co., 06-363 p. 3 (La.11/29/06), .
Banquer v. Guidroz 5 So. 3d 206 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
11/29/06), , 552: The commissioner of insurance, in drafting the form, requires six tasks, all of which we find to be pertinent to rejecting UM coverage....
Livings v. LAWYERS PROTECTIVE PLAN 997 So. 2d 906 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
Co., 06-363 p.3 (La.11/29/06), -547 .
Paragon Lofts Condominium Owners Ass'n v. Paragon Lofts, L.L.C. 1 So. 3d 753 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
Co., 06-363 p. 3 (La.11/29/06), ; see also La.Code Civ.
Elvist J. Tabor, Sr. v. Anco Insulations, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
Co., 2006-363[,] p. 3 (La.11/29/06), see [La.Code Civ.P.]
Diane Edden v. Jody Ortego, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
11/29/06), the trial court found that the UM waiver was invalid and granted Plaintiff’s motion for partial summary judgment.
Tabor v. Anco Insulations, Inc. 999 So. 2d 258 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
Co., 2006-363[,] p. 3 (La.11/29/06), , see [La.Code Civ.P.]
Edden v. Ortego 999 So. 2d 300 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
Co., 06-363 (La.11/29/06), , the trial court found that the UM waiver was invalid and granted Plaintiffs motion for partial summary judgment.
Raywood Joseph Broussard v. Terry Smith La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
Broussard v. Smith 999 So. 2d 1171 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
Carla Ann Gingles v. Kinnery Dardenne La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
Co., 06-363 (La.11/29/06), -547.
Ronald Joseph McDowell v. Primeaux Landz, LLC La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
Co., 2006-363[,] p. 3 (La.11/29/06), see [La.Code Civ.P.]
Gingles v. Dardenne 998 So. 2d 795 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
Co., 06-363 (La.11/29/06), -547 .
McDowell v. PRIMEAUX LANDZ, LLC 998 So. 2d 339 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
Co., 2006-363[,] p. 3 (La.11/29/06), , see [La.Code Civ.P.]
Grace R. Harper v. Direct General Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
11/29/06), noted the following tasks that must be completed for UM/UIM coverage to be validly rejected: (1) initialing the selection or rejection of coverage chosen; (2) if limits lower than the policy limits are chosen (available in options 2 and 4), then filling in the amount of coverage
Harper v. DIRECT GENERAL INS. CO. OF LA. 998 So. 2d 783 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
Co., 06-363, pp. 11-12 (La.11/29/06), , noted the following tasks that must be completed for UM/UIM coverage to be validly rejected: (1) initialing the selection or rejection of coverage chosen; (2) if limits lower than the policy limits are chosen (available in options 2 and 4), then filling in the amount of coverage selected for each person and eac
Justiss Oil Company, Inc. v. Leon Hanson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
11/29/06), see [La.Code Civ.P.]
JUSTISS OIL CO., INC. v. Hanson 996 So. 2d 545 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
Co., 2006-363[,] p. 3 (La.11/29/06), , see [La.Code Civ.P.]
Pugh v. St. Tammany Parish School Bd. 994 So. 2d 95 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
Co., 06-0363 (La.11/29/06), .
McDaniel v. CHARITY HOS. AND MEDICAL CENTER 991 So. 2d 1138 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
Co., 06-363, p. 3 (La.11/29/06), .
LaMartina v. Louisiana Patient's Compensation Fund 993 So. 2d 249 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
Co., 06-363, p. 9 (La.11/29/06), .
Clement v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. 992 So. 2d 506 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
Co., 06-363, *509 p. 4 (La.11/29/06), .
Phil D. Mayers, Jr. v. Sonny Marmet La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
Co., 2006-363 p. 3 (La.11/29/06), see [La.Code Civ.P.]

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by