Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Duncan v. USAA Ins. Co., 950 So. 2d 544.

434 citing documents.

Mayers v. Marmet 985 So. 2d 315 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
Co., 2006-363 p. 3 (La.11/29/06), , see [La.Code Civ.P.]
Johnson v. Folse 986 So. 2d 110 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
Co., 2006-363 (La.11/29/06), .
Williams v. CLARENDON NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY 979 So. 2d 1281 La. 2008
Co., 06-363 (La.11/29/06), .
Julia A. Rashall v. Charles K. Pennington La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
Rashall v. Pennington 982 So. 2d 301 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
Co., 06-363 (La.11/29/06), .
Clinton L. Johnson v. Government Employees Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
Johnson v. Government Employees Insurance Co. 980 So. 2d 870 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
Insurance Company, 06-363, p. 4 (La.11/29/06), *874 547 .
Pugh v. St. Tammany Parish School Board 978 So. 2d 1260 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
Ferguson v. Bocskov 983 So. 2d 162 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
Plaintiff relied on the Louisiana Supreme Court decision in Duncan v. USAA Ins., Co., et al, 06-363 (La.11/29/06), in support of her position.
Thunderrolls, Inc. v. Ooida Risk Retention Group 977 So. 2d 312 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
11/29/06), , 546-547: A motion for summary judgment is a procedural device used when there is no genuine issue of material fact.
Lisa Johnson v. Ashley Citizen La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
11/29/06), wherein the Louisiana Supreme Court determined that an insurer’s failure to include a policy number on the UM coverage waiver form rendered the waiver invalid.
Thunderrolls, Inc. v. Ooida Risk Retention Group La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
11/29/06), -547: A motion for summary judgment is a procedural device used when there is no genuine issue of material fact.
Johnson v. Citizen 978 So. 2d 1087 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
Co., 06-363 (La.11/29/06), , wherein the Louisiana Supreme Court determined that an insurer's failure to include a policy number on the UM coverage waiver form rendered the waiver invalid.
Samaha v. Rau 977 So. 2d 880 La. 2008
Co., 2006-363 p. 3 (La.11/29/06), , see La.
Gray v. American Nat. Property & Cas. Co. 977 So. 2d 839 La. 2008
Co., 06-0363, p. 4 (La.11/29/06), .
Moore v. Kenilworth/Kailas Properties 978 So. 2d 475 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
Co., 2006-363, p. 3-4 (La.11/29/06)
Fescharek v. US Agencies Ins. Co. 979 So. 2d 562 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
In support of this motion, plaintiff attached a copy of the same "Uninsured/Underinsured Motorist Bodily Injury Coverage Form" relied on by defendant, but she argues the form is invalid as the name of the insurance company does not appear on the waiver form as required by the holding of the Louisiana Supreme Court in Duncan v. USAA Insurance Co., 06-363 (La.11/29/06), .
Carl Moss v. Ronald Gifford La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
Stiebing v. Romero 974 So. 2d 752 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
Insurance Co., 06-363 (La.11/29/06), ; La.C.C.P.
Distinguished Pigron v. Allstate Ins. Co. 972 So. 2d 1269 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
The Pigrons argued if a UM rejection form does not reference the correct policy number it is invalid on its face, citing the Louisiana Supreme Court case of Duncan v. USAA Insurance Co., 06-363, (La.11/29/06), .
Distinguished Shannon Pigron v. Allstate Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
Baide v. Allen 974 So. 2d 688 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
Co., 06-0363 (La.11/29/06), in support of her claim that a waiver must contain the policy number to be valid.
Ramirez v. STATE FARM MUT. AUTO. INS. CO. 971 So. 2d 474 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
Insurance Co., 06-363, pp. 3-4 (La.11/29/06), , 546-547: A motion for summary judgment is a procedural device used when there is no genuine issue of material fact.
Diana Sue Ramirez v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
11/29/06), -547: A motion for summary judgment is a procedural device used when there is no genuine issue of material fact.
Green v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. 978 So. 2d 912 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
Co., XXXX-XXXX, p. 4 (La.11/29/06), .
Distinguished Carter v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 964 So. 2d 375 La. 2007
Co., 06-0363 (La.11/29/06), , because the Commissioner of Insurance’s regulations specifically allow omission of the policy number if it does not exist at the time UM waiver form is completed.
Distinguished Carter v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company 964 So. 2d 375 La. 2007
Co., 06-0363 (La.11/29/06), , because the Commissioner of Insurance's regulations specifically allow omission of the policy number if it does exist at the time UM waiver form is completed.
Mildred Kirklin, Et Vir v. Brookshire Grocery Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
11/29/06), -547: A motion for summary judgment is a procedural device used when there is no genuine issue of material fact.
State, Department of Transportation & Development v. Cecil 966 So. 2d 131 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
Co., 2006-363 (La.11/29/06), ; Morris v. Union Parish Police Jury, 39,709 (La.App.
Perry v. American Home Assurance Company 958 So. 2d 1216 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
11/29/06), -554 , [1] that UM coverage is not effectively waived when the line for the policy number is left blank on the form prescribed by the commissioner of insurance.
Littleton v. Enterkin 956 So. 2d 741 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
As stated in Duncan v. U.S.A.A., 06-363, (La.11/29/06), , UM statutes must be strictly construed “notwithstanding the language of the policy, the intentions of the parties, or the presence or absence of a premium charge or payment.” La.
Bryant v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 952 So. 2d 683 La. 2007
Insurance Co., 06-0363 (La.11/29/06), (WEIMER, J., dissenting), on reh’g, 06-0363 (La.2/16/07), 950 So.2d at 556 *684 (WEIMER, J., dissenting from denial of rehearing).
Bryant v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company 952 So. 2d 683 La. 2007
See Duncan v. USAA Insurance Co., 06-0363 (La.11/29/06), .
Mitchell v. Kenner Regional Medical Center 951 So. 2d 1193 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
Co., 2006-363 (La.11/29/06), .

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by