Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Rose, 949 So. 2d 1236.

84 citing documents.

State of Louisiana Versus Cody Breaux La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2023
State of Louisiana v. Delbert Davis La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2022
2/22/07), (“The term ‘unfair prejudice,’ as to a criminal defendant, speaks to the capacity of some concededly relevant evidence to lure the factfinder into declaring guilt on a ground different from proof specific to the offense charged.”) (citing Old Chief v. United States, 519 U.S. 172, 180, 117 S.Ct.
State Of Louisiana v. Shane Michael Perez La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2021
State of Louisiana Versus Terez Ard La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2021
State of Louisiana v. Kentrell Hickerson La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2020
2/22/07), -44, as follows: It is well settled that courts may not admit evidence of other crimes to show the defendant as a man of bad character who has acted in conformity with his bad character.
State Of Louisiana v. Jason Hicks La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2020
State of Louisiana v. Joseph Peterson La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2020
State Of Louisiana v. Ollie Montrell Selders, Jr. La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
State of Louisiana Versus Adam Littleton La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2019
State v. Rose, 2006–0402, p. 13 (La.2/22/07), citing Old Chief v. United States, 519 U.S. 172, 180, 117 S.Ct.
State of Louisiana v. Kenneth Jones La. 2019
2/22/07), (internal citations removed).
State Of Louisiana v. Jordan Cooks La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
State of Louisiana v. Raymond George Johnson La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2019
2/22/07), evidence that the defendant had physically abused the victim in the past was determined to be admissible to show motive for her murder and to demonstrate the volatile nature of their relationship.
State of Louisiana v. Charles P. Mayeux, Jr. AKA Charles P. Mayeux La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
2/22/07), the supreme court addressed the admissibility of other crimes evidence in connection with a second degree murder trial following the death of the defendant’s wife.
State v. Mayeux 265 So. 3d 1096 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
2/22/07), , the supreme court addressed the admissibility of other crimes evidence in connection with a second degree murder trial following the death of the defendant's wife.
State v. Coleman 259 So. 3d 1203 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2018
02/22/07), ; State v. Howard , 47,495 (La.
State v. Colby 244 So. 3d 1260 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2018
2/22/07), ; State v. Jackson , (La.
State v. Cooley 247 So. 3d 1159 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2018
2/22/07), , finding that past instances of domestic abuse violence are admissible.
State v. Hutsell 241 So. 3d 542 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2018
2/22/07), , 1245, the court held that "evidence that defendant physically abused Ms. Rose is independently relevant to show the volatile nature of the relationship between defendant and Ms. Rose.
State v. Brown 235 So. 3d 1314 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
State of Louisiana v. Mark Anthony Broussard La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
In brief, the defendant argues: 17 (La.
State v. Broussard 224 So. 3d 23 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
In brief, the defendant argues: | (La.
State v. Young 216 So. 3d 236 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
State of Louisiana v. William Chester Farry Jr. AKA William Chester Farry AKA William C. Farry AKA William … La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
2/22/07), the court noted that the applicable burden was unclear, writing in a footnote: [Louisiana Code of Evidence Article] 1104 states: The burden of proof in a shall be
State v. Farry 206 So. 3d 1222 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
2/22/07), , the court noted that the applicable burden was unclear, writing in a footnote: [Louisiana Code of Evidence Article] 1104 states: The burden of proof in a shall be identical to the burden of proof required by Federal Rules of Evidence
State of Louisiana v. Christopher Lance Washburn La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
Explained State v. Washburn 206 So. 3d 1143 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
State of Louisiana v. Stoney J. Lapoint La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
State v. Lapoint 202 So. 3d 593 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
State v. Falgout 198 So. 3d 1232 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
State v. Rose, 06-0402, p. 13 (La.2/22/07), ().
STATE OF LOUISIANA VERSUS RAY DELOACH AKA RAY A. DELOACH La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
State v. Rumley 183 So. 3d 640 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
The defendant is correct that evidence of other crimes, wrongs or acts committed by a defendant is inadmissible because of the “substantial risk of grave prejudice to the defendant.” State v. Rose, 2006-0402, p. 12 (La.2/22/07), ().
State v. Davis 176 So. 3d 580 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
See State v. Rose, 06-0402 (La.2/22/07), ; (La.App.
State v. Hunter 176 So. 3d 530 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
See State v. Rose, 06-0402, p. 15 (La.2/22/07), (evidence that the defendant previously physically abused the victim was admissible to show motive for her murder and to demonstrate the volatile nature of their relationship); -84 (La.1981) (evidence that defendant and victim had a volatile relationship and that defendant ha
State v. Cox 174 So. 3d 131 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
State v. Rose, 06-0402, p. 13 (La.2/22/07), ().
State of Louisiana v. Jared Paul Pontiff La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
State v. Pontiff 166 So. 3d 1120 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
at 318 (quoting State v. Rose, 06-402, p. 14 (La.2/22/07), ).
State v. Taylor 165 So. 3d 1115 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
It is well settled that a court may not admit evidence of other crimes to show a “defendant as a man of bad character who has acted in conformity with his bad character.” State v. Rose, 2006-0402, p. 12 (La.2/22/07), , citing La.
State v. Rapp 161 So. 3d 103 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
See State v. Rose, 06-0402, p. 12 (La.2/22/07), .
State v. Hardy 154 So. 3d 537 La. 2014
State v. Rose, 2006-0402, p. 13 (La.2/22/07), , citing Old Chief v. United States, 519 U.S. *539 172, 180 , 117 S.Ct.
State of Louisiana v. Stephan M. Bergeron La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
State v. Bergeron 150 So. 3d 523 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State v. Rose, 06-402, p. 13 (La.2/22/07), -44 .
State v. Frith 151 So. 3d 946 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
art. 404(B)(1); State v. Rose, 2006-0402, p. 12 (La.2/22/07), .
State of Louisiana v. Nathaniel Wayne Carmouche La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
State v. Rose, 06-0402 (La.2/22/07), (internal citations removed).
State v. Mark 146 So. 3d 886 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
The Louisiana Supreme Court set forth the applicable law in State v. Rose, 06-0402, pp. 12-13 (La.2/22/07), -44 , as follows: It is well settled that courts may not admit evidence of other crimes to show the defendant as a man of bad character who has acted in conformity with his bad character.
State v. Gordon 146 So. 3d 758 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
The Louisiana Supreme Court set forth the applicable law in State v. Rose, 2006- *772 0402, pp. 12-13 (La.2/22/07), -1244 , as follows: It is well settled that courts may not admit evidence of other crimes to show the defendant as a man of bad character who has acted in conformity with his bad character.
State of Louisiana v. Alcide Hypolite La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
State v. Hypolite 139 So. 3d 687 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
at 318 (quoting State v. Rose, 06-402 (La.2/22/07), ).
State v. Wilson 138 So. 3d 661 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
The Louisiana Supreme Court set forth the applicable law as to the admissibility of evidence of other crimes, wrongs, or acts in State v. Rose, 06-0402, pp. 12-13 (La.2/22/07), -44 , as follows: It is well settled that courts may not admit evidence of other crimes to show the defendant as a man of bad character who has acted in conformity with his bad character.
State v. Webb 133 So. 3d 258 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State v. Rose, 2006-0402, p. 13 (La.2/22/07), (citing Old Chief v. United States, 519 U.S. 172, 180 , 117 S.Ct.
State v. Jackson 132 So. 3d 516 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
art. 404(B)(1); State v. Rose, 2006-0402 (La.2/22/07), ; State v. Howard, 47,495 (La.App.2d Cir.11/14/12), .