Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Gutweiler, 979 So. 2d 469.

18 citing documents.

State of Louisiana in the Interest of M.H. La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2023
4/8/08), State in the Interest of K.L.A., 14-1410 (La.
State of Louisiana v. Willie J. Stevens, Sr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
State of Louisiana Versus Timothy P. Roussel La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2019
State v. Kory Mattox State 257 So. 3d 809 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
4/8/08), , 479 ; In re Grand Jury , 737 So.2d at 8 ; State v. Trosclair , 443 So.2d at 1102 -03 .
Woodrow Wilson Constr., LLC v. Amtek of La., Inc. 256 So. 3d 305 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
State v. Gourgues 226 So. 3d 1116 La. 2017
State v. Gourgues 204 So. 3d 1051 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
4/8/08), , and incorrectly applied the Public Records Act, La.
State of Louisiana v. Khanh H. Nguyen La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
State v. Nguyen 150 So. 3d 562 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
3 Cir. 9/27/06) , , ajfd in part, rev’d in part on other grounds, 06-2596 (La.4/8/08), .
State v. Ross 144 So. 3d 932 La. 2014
5 See State v. Gutweiler, 2006- *939 2596 (La.4/8/08), ; In re Grand Jury, 737 So.2d at 8 ; State v. Tros-clair, 443 So.2d at 1102-03 .
State v. Clark 117 So. 3d 1246 La. 2013
Further, “[t]he meaning and intent of a law is determined by considering the law in its entirety and all other laws on the same subject matter, and placing a construction on the provision in question that is consistent with the express terms of the law and with the obvious intent of the Legislature in enacting it.” State v. Gutweiler, 06-2596, pp. 9-10 (La.4/8/08); (citations omitted).
State v. Breaux 96 So. 3d 1226 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State v. Gutweiler, 06-2596 (La.4/8/08), .
State v. Williams 60 So. 3d 1189 La. 2011
1 “cannot be read in a vacuum and must be interpreted with the statutes that both precede and follow it,” in keeping with the general rule of statutory construction that, “all laws pertaining to the same subject matter must be interpreted in pari materia, or in reference to each other.” Williams , 09-993, p. 4, 38 So.3d at 1182 (citing La.Civ.Code art. 13; State v. Gutweiler, 06-2596 (La.4/8/08), ).
State v. Cooper 50 So. 3d 115 La. 2010
In State v. Gutweiler, 2006-2596 p. 9 (La.4/8/08), , we stated: “Legislative intent is the fundamental question in all cases of statutory interpretation, and rules of statutory construction are designed to ascertain and enforce the intent of the Legislature.” Consequently, “when a law is clear and unambiguous and its application does not lead to absurd consequenc
State of Louisiana v. Mark B. Brignac La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
State v. Brignac 49 So. 3d 960 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
3 Cir. 9/27/06) , , writ granted, judgment affirmed in part, reversed in part on other grounds, 06-2596 (La.4/8/08), .
State of Louisiana v. James Deron Williams La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
State v. Williams 38 So. 3d 1180 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
La.Civ.Code art. 13; State v. Gutweiler, 06-2596 (La.4/8/08), .