Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Batiste, 947 So. 2d 810.

76 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Kanethra Burnett La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2024
App. 4 Cir. 12/20/06), State v. Landry, 03-1671 (La.
State of Louisiana v. William A. McDonough La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2023
App. 4 Cir. 12/20/06), ).
State of Louisiana v. Sharonda S. Freeman La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2023
App. 4 Cir. 12/20/06), ).
State of Louisiana v. Keith Kisack La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2022
App 4 Cir. 12/20/06), –821; see also La.
State of Louisiana v. Hugh Gilliam La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2022
App. 4 Cir. 12/20/06), State v. Clay, 05-1467, p. 9 (La.
State of Louisiana v. Elijah Mealancon La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2021
App. 4 Cir. 12/20/06) ).
State of Louisiana v. Breanna S. White La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2020
App. 4 Cir. 12/20/06), (defendant stated he shot and killed the victim over a $20 dominos bet and claimed State failed to refute 6 his self-defense claim; defendant’s 20-year sentence not excessive).
State of Louisiana v. Tyrone T. Duckett La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2019
State of Louisiana v. Brandon R. Laurant La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2019
App. 4 Cir. 12/20/06), (emphasis added).
State v. Degregory 274 So. 3d 902 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
App. 4 Cir. 12/20/06), , 820 (quoting State v. Landry , [20]03-1671, p. 8 (La.
State of Louisiana v. Paul Knatt La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
4 Cir. 12/20/06), the defendant and the victim argued over a twenty-dollar bet on a domino game.
State v. Knatt 265 So. 3d 840 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
4 Cir. 12/20/06) , , the defendant and the victim argued over a twenty-dollar bet on a domino game.
State v. Turner 259 So. 3d 1089 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
App. 4 Cir. 12/20/06), , 820 (quoting State v. Landry , 03-1671, p. 8 (La.
State v. Bibbins 258 So. 3d 134 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
App. 4 Cir. 12/20/06), , 820, this Court further explained that a reviewing court may not set aside a sentence for excessiveness if the record *149 evidences a factual basis for the sentence imposed, even if there has not been full compliance with La.
State v. Doucette 243 So. 3d 704 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
App. 4 Cir. 12/20/06), , this Court further explained that a reviewing court may not set aside a sentence for excessiveness if the record evidences a factual basis for the imposed sentence, even if there has not been full compliance with La.
State v. Dove 194 So. 3d 92 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
4 Cir. 12/20/06), (emphasis added).
State v. Ladd 192 So. 3d 235 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
App 4 Cir. 12/20/06), , 820-821: An appellate court reviewing a claim of excessive sentence must determine whether the trial court adequately complied with the statutory guidelines in La.C.Cr.P.
State v. Wells 191 So. 3d 1127 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
State v. Ellis 190 So. 3d 354 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
4 Cir. 12/20/06), ; State v. Major, 96-1214 at p. 10 (La.App.
State v. Spencer 151 So. 3d 816 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State v. Epperley 151 So. 3d 721 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
4 Cir. 12/20/06), , this Court further explained that the role of the appellate court in reviewing a claim of excessive sentence is to determine whether the trial court adequately complied ' with the statutory guidelines enunciated in Louisiana Code of Criminal Procedure article 894.1, as well as whether the facts of the case warr
State v. Cushenberry 146 So. 3d 777 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State v. Wilson 138 So. 3d 661 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State of Louisiana v. Jeremy Osborn La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
State v. Osborn 127 So. 3d 1087 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Carter 131 So. 3d 153 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
4 Cir. 12/20/06) , , this Court further explained that a reviewing court may not set aside a sentence for excessiveness if the record evidences a factual basis for the imposed sentence, even if there has not been full compliance with La.C.Cr.P.
State v. Norah 131 So. 3d 172 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
4 Cir. 12/20/06), (emphasis added).
State v. Sholar 136 So. 3d 1 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Vargas-Alcerreca 126 So. 3d 569 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Hamdalla 126 So. 3d 619 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
4 Cir. 12/20/06), (emphasis added).
State v. Peters 123 So. 3d 307 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Batiste, 06-0875 (La.12/20/06), .
State v. Jones 119 So. 3d 859 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
4 Cir. 12/20/06), ; State v. Sykes, 2004-1199, p. 6 (La.App.
State v. Marcelin 116 So. 3d 928 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
4 Cir. 12/20/06), , this Court explained the standard of review: An appellate court reviewing a claim of excessive sentence must determine whether the trial court adequately complied with the statutory guidelines in La.C.Cr.P.
State v. Veal 116 So. 3d 779 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
4 Cir. 12/20/06) , ; State v. Sykes, 2004-1199 (La.App.
State v. Slattery 116 So. 3d 804 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
4 Cir. 12/20/06) , ; State v. Landry, 2003-1671 (La.App.
State v. Ross 115 So. 3d 616 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
4 Cir. 12/20/06), ; State v. Sykes, 04-1199, 04-0947, p. 6 (La.App.
State v. Smith 108 So. 3d 376 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Williams 108 So. 3d 319 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
4 Cir. 12/20/06), , this Court further explained that the role of the appellate court in reviewing a claim of excessive sentence is to determine whether the trial court adequately complied with the statutory guidelines enunciated in Louisiana Code of Criminal Procedure article 894.1, as well as whether the facts of the case warran
State v. Sims 106 So. 3d 709 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State v. Pleasant 102 So. 3d 247 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
4 Cir. 12/20/06), ; State v. Sykes, 04-1199, 04-0947, p. 6 (La.App.
State v. Wilson 99 So. 3d 1067 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State v. Kirk 98 So. 3d 934 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
4 Cir. 12/20/06), , 815 citing State v. McClain, 95-2546, p. 9 (La.App.
State v. Williams 85 So. 3d 759 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
4 Cir. 12/20/06) , ; State v. Sykes, 2004-1199 (La.
State v. McElveen 73 So. 3d 1033 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
4 Cir. 12/20/06), , this court further explained: |98An appellate court reviewing a claim of excessive sentence must determine whether the trial court adequately complied with the statutory guidelines in La.C.Cr.P.
State v. Parker 76 So. 3d 55 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
App. 4 Cir. 12/20/06), ; State v. McClain, 95-2546 (La.App.
State v. Payton 68 So. 3d 594 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
4 Cir. 12/20/06) , , the defendant was charged with and convicted of manslaughter.
State v. Wells 64 So. 3d 303 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
4 Cir. 12/20/06) , ; State v. Landry, 03-1671 (La.App.
State v. Summers 52 So. 3d 951 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
4 Cir. 12/20/06), ; State v. Clay, 05-1467, p. 9 (La.App.
State v. Fernandez 50 So. 3d 219 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
4 Cir. 12/20/06) , ; State v. Landry, 2003-1671 (La.App.
State v. Jenkins 45 So. 3d 173 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010