Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Bellard v. American Cent. Ins. Co., 980 So. 2d 654.

186 citing documents.

Helen Moore v. MacQuarie Infrastructure Real Assets La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
4/18/08), La.Code Civ.P.
Moore v. Macquarie Infrastructure Real Assets 258 So. 3d 750 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
4/18/08), , 671 ; La.Code Civ.P.
Goldsby v. Blocker 244 So. 3d 703 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
Black Water Marsh, LLC v. Roger C. Ferriss Properties, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
Co., 2007–1335 p. 25 (La.4/18/08), Greater New Orleans Expressway Commission v. Olivier, 2002–2795 p. 3 (La.11/18/03), (“Appeals are taken from the judgment, not the written reasons for judgment.”); La.
Gbb Properties Two, LLC v. Stirling Properties, LLC La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
4/18/08), La.Code Civ.P.
GBB Properties Two, LLC v. Stirling Properties, LLC 224 So. 3d 1001 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
4/18/08), ; La.Code Civ.P.
Anderson v. City of New Orleans 222 So. 3d 800 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
4/18/08), ; Greater New Orleans Expressway Commission v. Olivier, 02-2795 p. 3 (La.
White v. Normand 222 So. 3d 205 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
4/18/08), .Where the factfinder’s determination is based on | fits decision to credit the testimony of one of two or more witnesses, that finding can virtually never be manifestly erroneous.
State ex rel. A.S. 220 So. 3d 179 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
State ex rel. Department of Children & Family Services, Child Support Enforcement ex rel. Bushman v. Knapp 216 So. 3d 130 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
4/18/08), ; Greater New Orleans Expressway Commission v. Olivier, 02-2795, p. 3 (La.
Thomas C. Royer v. State of Louisiana, Dept. of Transportation & Development La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
4/18/08), in support of its argument.
Royer v. State, Department of Transportation & Development 210 So. 3d 910 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
4/18/08), , in support of its argument.
Jasmine Jones v. Progressive Security Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
4/18/08), (citation omitted) the state supreme court reiterated the standards set forth in Duncan v. Kansas City Southern Railway Co., 00-66 (La.
Jones v. Progressive Security Insurance Co. 209 So. 3d 912 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
4/18/08), , (citation omitted) the state supreme court reiterated the standards set forth in Duncan v. Kansas City Southern Railway Co., 00-66 (La.
Licciardi v. Licciardi 207 So. 3d 638 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
Monroe v. McDaniel 207 So. 3d 1172 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
4/18/08); (“the district court’s oral or written reasons for judgment form no part of the judgment, and that appellate courts review judgments, not reasons for judgment”).
Wallace C. Drennan, Inc. v. St. Charles Parish 202 So. 3d 535 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
Gaspard v. Safeway Insurance Co. 202 So. 3d 1128 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
Co., 07-1335 (La.4/18/08), .
Fountain v. Ochsner Clinic Foundation Westbank Campus 194 So. 3d 728 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
Co., 07-1335, p. 27 (La.4/18/08), .
Succession of George D. Carprenter La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
Co., 07-1335 (La.4/18/08)
Montz v. Williams 188 So. 3d 1050 La. 2016
Co., 07-1335, p. 27 (La.4/18/08), .
Leidelmeijen v. Ferncrest Manor Nursing Home Luba Workers' Comp. 191 So. 3d 38 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
Co., 07- 1335, 07-1399, p. 27 (La.4/18/08), ().
Demetrious R. Frazier v. Luke A. Difulco, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
4/18/08), that a “district court’s oral or written reasons for 7 judgment form no part of the judgment, and that appellate courts review judgments, not reasons for judgment.” Further, the supreme court stated in Greater New Orleans Expressway Commission v. Olivier, 02-2795, p.
The Knoll Law Firm, LLC v. Vincent J. Desalvo La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
Co., 07-1335 (La.4/18/08)
Knoll Law Firm, LLC v. DeSalvo 185 So. 3d 276 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
Co., 07-1335 (La.4/18/08), .
Meyers & Associates, Inc. v. the Coushatta Tribe of Louisiana La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
4/18/08), the supreme court stated that there exists ―the well-settled rule that the district court‘s oral reasons or written reasons for judgment form no part of the judgment, and that appellate courts review judgments, not reasons for judgment.‖ Additionally, it has long been recognized that ―where there are only wr
Meyer & Associates, Inc. v. Coushatta Tribe of Louisiana 185 So. 3d 222 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
In Bellard v. American Central Insurance Co., 07-1335, 07-1399, p. 25 (La.4/18/08), , the supreme court stated that there exists “the well-settled rule that the district court’s oral reasons or written reasons for judgment form no part of the judgment,.and that appellate courts review judgments, -not reasons for judgment.” Additionally, it has long been recognized that “where there are only writ
State in the Interest of C. F., A. F., & A. G. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
Brammer v. Bossier Parish School Board 183 So. 3d 606 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
Bellard v. American Central Insurance Co., 07-1335 (La.04/18/08), ; Swayze v. State Farm Mutual Auto.
Explained Eddie Hoffman v. 21st Century North America Insurance Company and Carolyn Elzy 209 So. 3d 702 La. 2015
Co, 07-1335, p. 19, , the courts have struggled with the question of double recovery or windfall that might arise as a consequence of the victim’s receipt of an outside payment.
Michael J. Leger, II v. Danielle Gotreaux Leger La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
Johnson v. CLD, Inc. 179 So. 3d 695 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
Co., 2007-1335 (La.4/18/08), .
Leger v. Leger 215 So. 3d 773 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Co., 07-1335, 07-1399, p. 25 (La.4/18/08), .
Zimmerman v. Progressive Security Insurance Co. 174 So. 3d 1230 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
Co., 2007-1335 (La.04/18/08), .
Shepard v. Robinson Construction, LLC 170 So. 3d 387 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
Co., 07-1335 (La.4/18/08), .
Hubbard v. Oswalt 169 So. 3d 760 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
Co., 07-1335 (La.04/18/08), .
Scarberry v. Entergy Corp. 172 So. 3d 51 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Co., 07-1335, p. 18 (La.4/18/08), [citations omitted].
Clyde Snider, Jr., Et Ux v. Louisiana Medical Mutual Insurance Company 169 So. 3d 319 La. 2015
Co., 07-1335 (La.4/18/08), .
Pollard v. Schiff 161 So. 3d 48 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Co., 07-1335, p. 28 (La.4/18/08), , the Court stated: In considering expert testimony, the trier of fact may accept or reject, in whole or in part, the opinion expressed by an expert, even to the point of substituting its own common sense and judgment for that of an expert witness, where, in the factfinder’s opinion, such *57 substitution appears
Union Federal Credit Union v. Thornton 162 So. 3d 414 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
Co., 07-1335 (La.4/18/08), .
Jessie Cole, Et Ux. v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
4/18/08), the supreme court addressed the issue of a UM insurer’s entitlement to a credit for workers’ compensation benefits paid.
Cole v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co. 149 So. 3d 831 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Co., 07-1335 (La.4/18/08), , the supreme court addressed the issue of a UM insurer’s entitlement to a credit for workers’ compensation benefits paid.
Morgan v. Glazers Wholesale Drug Co. 147 So. 3d 295 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
Co., 07-1335 (La.4/18/08), ; Greater New Orleans Expressway Comm.
Advantage Personnel & Louisiana Safety Ass'n of Timbermen v. Cleave 146 So. 3d 221 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
See Bellard v. American Central Insurance Co., 07-1335 (La.4/18/08), , and Cutsinger v. Redfem, 08-2607 (La.5/22/09), .
Watkins v. Lake Charles Memorial Hospital 144 So. 3d 944 La. 2014
Co., 2007-1335 (La.4/18/08), .
Chesapeake Operating, Inc. v. City of Shreveport 132 So. 3d 537 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Co., 2007-1335 (La.4/18/08), ; Franklin v. Camterra Resources Partners, Inc., 48,021 (La.App.2d Cir.5/22/13), .
Snider v. Louisiana Medical Mutual Insurance 130 So. 3d 922 La. 2013
Co., 2007-1335 (La.4/18/08), .
Harley-Davison Credit Corp. v. Morris Davis La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
4/18/08), Greater New Orleans Expressway Commission v. Olivier, 2002-2795 p. 3 (La.
Harley-Davidson Credit Corp. v. Davis 127 So. 3d 50 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Co., 2007-1335 p. 25 (La.4/18/08), ; Greater New Orleans Expressway Commission v. Olivier, 2002-2795 p. 3 (La.11/18/03), (“Appeals are taken from the judgment, not the written reasons for judgment.”); La.
City of Gretna v. Morice 128 So. 3d 468 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Co., 07-1335 p. 25 (La.4/18/08), ; Alvarez v. Ciasen, 06-304 (LaApp.