Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Samaha v. Rau, 977 So. 2d 880.

632 citing documents.

Wofford v. Dunnick 36 So. 3d 370 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
La.Code Civ.P art. 966; Samaha v. Rau, 07-1726 (La.2/26/08), .
Reilly v. SPINAZZE 34 So. 3d 1069 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
Samaha v. Rau, 2007-1726 (La.2/26/08), ; Duncan v. USAA Ins.
Jackson v. Bally's Louisiana, Inc. 36 So. 3d 1001 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Samaba v. Rau, 2007-1726, pp. 3-4 (La.2/26/08), -883 .
Suarez v. MANDO 62 So. 3d 131 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Samaha v. Ran, 07-1726, pp. 5-6 (La.2/26/08), ; Pfiffner , 94-0924 at 9, 643 So.2d at 1233 .
Lifemark Hospitals of Louisiana, Inc. v. Pro Plus, LLC 30 So. 3d 1183 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
2/26/08), ; Allen v. State ex rel.
Zumpe v. Zara's Little Giant Super Market, Inc. 35 So. 3d 1158 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Samaha v. Rau, 07-1726, p. 3 (La.2/26/08), -83 .
Gleason v. Louisiana Department of Health & Hospitals 33 So. 3d 961 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
Samaha v. Rau, 07-1726 (La.2/26/08), ; Tillman v. Eldridge, 44,460 (La.App.2d Cir.7/15/09), .
Rizzo v. Ward 32 So. 3d 986 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Samaha v. Ran, 07-1726, pp. 3-4 (La.2/26/08), -83 .
Crowe v. WINN-DIXIE OF LOUISIANA, INC. 30 So. 3d 283 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Yuma Exploration and Production Co. Inc. v. Mayne & Mertz, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
Scientific Drilling International,inc. v. Lafayette Parish School Board Sales Tax Division La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
2/26/08), -83 (footnote omitted).
Scientific Drilling International, Inc. v. Meche 29 So. 3d 1283 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Samaba v. Rau, 07-1726, pp. 3-4 (La.2/26/08), -83 (footnote omitted).
Mayne & Mertz, Inc. v. Sweet Lake Land & Oil Co. 28 So. 3d 1227 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
See Samaha v. Rau, 07-1726 (La.2/26/08), .
Bamburg v. St. Francis Medical Center 30 So. 3d 1071 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
Samaha v. Rau, 2007-1726 (La.02/26/08), .
Mitchell v. VALTEAU 30 So. 3d 1108 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Samaha v. Rau, 07-1726, p. 3 (La.2/26/08), -83 .
Simmons v. Task Force Staffing Services, Inc. 30 So. 3d 223 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
II “A motion for summary judgment is a procedural device used when there is no genuine issue of material fact for all or part of the relief prayed for by a litigant.” Samaha, v. Rau, 07-1726, p. 3 (La.2/26/08), ; La.
Ebarb v. WILLIS KNIGHTON MEDICAL CENTER 33 So. 3d 203 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
9:2794 A; Samaha v. Rau, 2007-1726 (La.2/26/08), ; Snelling v. LSU Health Sciences Center, 43,332 (La.App.
Drummond v. Fakouri 30 So. 3d 111 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Samaha v. Rau, 2007-1726, pp. 3-4 (La.2/26/08), ; Allen v. State ex rel.
Charlotte Broussard v. Hertz Equipment Rental Corporation La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
2/26/08), -83 (footnote omitted).
Broussard v. Hertz Equipment Rental Corp. 27 So. 3d 337 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
Samaha v. Rau, 07-1726, pp. 3-4 (La.2/26/08), -83 (footnote omitted).
Jenkins v. Haynes 24 So. 3d 966 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Samaha v. Ran, 07-1726, p. 3 (La.2/26/08), -83 .
Rebecca Djorghi v. Cynthia A. Glass, M.D. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
Keith Allen Portie v. Flavin Realty, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
2/26/08), -83 (footnote omitted).
Djorghi v. Glass 23 So. 3d 996 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
art. 966; Samaha v.Rau, 07-1726 (La.2/26/08), .
Portie v. Flavin [Realty] Inc. 22 So. 3d 1143 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Samaha v. Rau, 07-1726, pp. 3-4 (La.2/26/08), -83 (footnote omitted).
Mapp Construction, LLC v. Southgate Penthouses, LLC 29 So. 3d 548 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Samaha v. Rau, 2007-1726 (La.2/26/08), -883 .
Roberson v. Gordon 24 So. 3d 1031 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
2/26/08), ; Allen v. State ex rel.
CYCLE SPORT, LLC v. Jones 24 So. 3d 1031 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
2/26/08), ; Allen v. State ex rel.
Dillon v. LA MADELEINE, INC. 24 So. 3d 1030 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Williams v. Our Lady of the Lake Hospital, Inc. 22 So. 3d 997 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
See Samaha v. Rau, 07-1726, pp. 5-6 (La.2/26/08), ; see also La.
Nguyen v. Weston 20 So. 3d 548 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Samaha v. Ran, 07-1726, pp. 3-4 (La.2/26/08), -883 .
Foundation Materials, Inc. v. Carrollton Mid-City Investors, L.L.C. 17 So. 3d 513 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Samaha v. Rau, 07-1726, p. 3 (La.2/26/08), -83 .
Latiolais v. Teachers' Retirement System of Louisiana 22 So. 3d 948 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Samaha v. Ran, 07-1726, p. 5 (La.2/26/08), .
Humphrey v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 16 So. 3d 1252 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
Samaha v. Rau, 07-1726 (La.2/26/08), .
Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corp. v. Louisiana Tax Commission 23 So. 3d 329 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Samaha v. Rau, 2007-1726 (La.2/26/08), .
Versluis v. GULF COAST TRANSIT CO. 17 So. 3d 459 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
In a recent Louisiana Supreme Court case, Samaha v. Rau, 2007-1726 (La.2/26/08), -883 , the Court outlined the standard of review in a motion for summary judgment and noted that: A motion for summary judgment is a procedural device used when there is no genuine issue of material fact for all or part of the relief prayed for by a litigant.
Harrah's Bossier City Investment Co. v. Bridges 22 So. 3d 921 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Samaha v. Rau, XXXX-XXXX, pp. 3-4 (La.2/26/08), ; Allen v. State ex rel.
Tillman v. Eldridge 17 So. 3d 69 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
DISCUSSION In Somaha v. Rau, 2007-1726 (La.2/26/08), , the supreme court explained at length the burden of proof and standard of review in medical malpractice eases: To establish a claim for medical malpractice, a plaintiff must prove, by a preponderance of the evidence: (1) the standard of care applicable to the defendant; (2) that the defendant breached that standard
Berry v. Paul Revere Life Insurance Co. 21 So. 3d 385 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Samaha v. Rau, 07-1726, p. 5 (La.2/26/08), .
Laizer v. Kosarek 16 So. 3d 442 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2009
Samaha v. Rau, XXXX-XXXX, pp. 3-4 (La.2/26/08), -883 .
MAX SMITH AND WESTENN, INC. v. Applied Concepts, Inc. 11 So. 3d 1245 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
CF Industries, Inc. v. TURNER INDUSTRIES SERVICES, INC. 11 So. 3d 1243 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Banister v. Day 13 So. 3d 229 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Samaha v. Rau, 2007-1726, p. 4 (La.2/26/08), -88 ; Pffiffner v. Correa, 1994-0924, 1994-0963, 1994-0992 (La.10/17/94), .
McNamara v. Augustino Bros., Inc. 13 So. 3d 736 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
STANDARD OF REVIEW “A summary judgment is reviewed on appeal de novo, with the appellate court using the same criteria that govern the trial court’s determination of whether summary judgment is appropriate; i.e., whether there is any genuine issue of material fact, and whether the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law of law.” Samaba v. Rau, 2007-1726, pp. 3-4 (La.2/26/08), -83 .
Guillory v. Outback Steakhouse of Florida, Inc. 9 So. 3d 356 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
2/26/08), ; Allen v. State ex rel.
Young v. Cox 9 So. 3d 356 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
2/26/08), ; Allen v. State ex rel.
Gaylord Container-Temple Inland v. Dunaway 13 So. 3d 659 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Samaha v. Rau, 07-1726 (La.2/26/08), -883 .
Marie Benniefiel v. Zurich American Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
2/26/08), -83 (footnote omitted).
Thomas Allen v. Allstate Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
Samaha v. Rau, 07-1726, pp. 3-4 (La.2/26/08), -83.
Benniefiel v. Zurich American Insurance 10 So. 3d 381 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Samaha v. Rau, 07-1726, pp. 3A (La.2/26/08), -83 (footnote omitted).