DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Samaha v. Rau, 977 So. 2d 880.

632 citing documents.

  • Allen v. Allstate Insurance Co. 10 So. 3d 374 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    Samaha v. Rau, 07-1726, pp. 3-4 (La.2/26/08), -83 .
  • Padilla v. Schwartz 11 So. 3d 6 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    art. 966(A)(2); Samaha v. Rau, 2007-1726, p. 4 (La.2/26/08), .
  • Brungardt v. Summitt 7 So. 3d 879 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    Standard of Review on Summary Judgment “A motion for summary judgment is a procedural device used when there is no genuine issue of material fact for all or part of the relief prayed for by a litigant.” Samaha v. Rau, 07-1726, p. 2 (La.2/26/08), ; La.
  • POULLARD v. Pittman 6 So. 3d 1064 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
    Samaha v. Rau, 07-1726 (La.2/26/08), .
  • Beaucoudray v. Walsh 9 So. 3d 916 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    4 Cir. 4/23/08), ; Sam-aba v. Rau, 07-1726, pp. 5-6 (La.2/26/08), -84 .
  • R.I. Lucien Tile Co. ex rel. Cage v. American Security Insurance 8 So. 3d 753 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    Samaha v. Rau, 2007-1726 p. 1-2 (La.2/26/08), -883 ; Wright v. Louisiana Power & Light, 2006-1181 p. 17 (La.3/9/07), ; King v. Parish National Bank, 2004-0337 p. 7 (La.10/19/04), ; Jones v. Estate of Santiago, 2003-1424 p. 5 (La.4/14/04), .
  • Samuel Tate v. Unitrin Auto and Home Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
  • Tate v. Unitrin Auto & Home Insurance Co. 5 So. 3d 1014 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    Samaha v. Rau, 07-1726 (La.2/26/08), .
  • Lee v. SHERIFF OF ST. TAMMANY PARISH 5 So. 3d 313 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
  • Harry John Walsh, Jr. v. Dr. Jason Morris La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
    2/26/08), -83 (footnotes omitted), the Louisiana Supreme Court discussed the review standard applicable to motions for summary judgment: A motion for summary judgment is a procedural device used when there is no genuine issue of material fact for all or part of the relief prayed for by a litigant
  • Walsh v. Morris 999 So. 2d 1261 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
    2/26/08), -83 (footnotes omitted), the Louisiana Supreme Court discussed the review standard applicable to motions for summary judgment: A motion for summary judgment is a procedural device used when there is no genuine issue of material fact for all or part of the relief prayed for by a litigant.
  • Willis v. Smith 999 So. 2d 1244 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
    9:2794 A; Samaha v. Rau, XXXX-XXXX (La.2/26/08), ; Thomas v. Willis-Knighton Med.
  • Bonvillian v. State Ex Rel. Department of Insurance 5 So. 3d 233 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
    Samaha v. Rau, 07-1726, p. 3 (La.2/26/08), -83 .
  • Aucoin v. Rochel 5 So. 3d 197 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
    | (Darryl Samaha, Husband of/and Karman Samaha v. David J. Rau, M.D., 07-1726, p. 5 (La.2/26/08), .
  • Elvist J. Tabor, Sr. v. Anco Insulations, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    2/26/08), -83 (footnote 4 omitted).
  • Tabor v. Anco Insulations, Inc. 999 So. 2d 258 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    Samaha v. Rau, 07-1726, pp. 3-4 (La.2/26/08), -83 (footnote omitted).
  • Ronald Joseph McDowell v. Primeaux Landz, LLC La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
  • McDowell v. PRIMEAUX LANDZ, LLC 998 So. 2d 339 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    Samaha v. Rau, 07-1726, pp. 3-4 (La.2/26/08), -83 .
  • Wyatt v. Hendrix 998 So. 2d 233 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    Samaha v. Rau, XXXX-XXXX (La.2/26/08), ; Wiley, supra .
  • Justiss Oil Company, Inc. v. Leon Hanson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    2/26/08), -83 (footnote omitted).
  • JUSTISS OIL CO., INC. v. Hanson 996 So. 2d 545 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    Samaha v. Rau, 07-1726, pp. 3-4 (La.2/26/08), -83 (footnote omitted).
  • Pugh v. St. Tammany Parish School Bd. 994 So. 2d 95 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
    This court's original opinion in this matter relied on the recent supreme court decision of Samaha v. Rau, 07-1726 (La.2/26/08), , as support for its apparent holding that a defendant need offer only the self-serving argument of its memorandum to point out the lack of factual support for the plaintiff's claim and meet its initial burden of proof.
  • McDaniel v. CHARITY HOS. AND MEDICAL CENTER 991 So. 2d 1138 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
    Samaha v. Rau, 07-1726, p. 9 (La.2/26/08), , citing Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317 , 106 S.Ct.
  • Pd v. Swl 993 So. 2d 240 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
    art. 966; Samaha v. Rau, 07-1726, p. 3 (La.2/26/08), .
  • LaMartina v. Louisiana Patient's Compensation Fund 993 So. 2d 249 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
    1 Cir.3/28/03), ; See Samaha v. Rau, 07-1726 (La.2/26/08), .
  • P.D. v. S.W.L. 993 So. 2d 240 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
    art. 966; Samaha v. Ran, 07-1726, p. 3 (La.2/26/08), .
  • Davis v. Picard 986 So. 2d 256 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
  • Snelling v. LSU HEALTH SCIENCES CENTER-MONROE 986 So. 2d 216 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    Samaha v. Rau, 07-1726 (La.2/26/08), .
  • Phil D. Mayers, Jr. v. Sonny Marmet La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
  • Wilson v. Davis 991 So. 2d 1052 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
    As recently noted by the Louisiana Supreme Court in Samaha v. Rau, 07-1726 (La.2/26/2008), , the Louisiana Legislature in 1997 enacted La.Code Civ.
  • Mayers v. Marmet 985 So. 2d 315 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    Samaha v. Rau, 07-1726, pp. 3-4 (La.2/26/08), -83 .
  • Thomas v. Willis-Knighton Medical Center 981 So. 2d 807 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    Samaha v. Rau, XXXX-XXXX (La.2/26/08), .