Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Adams v. Rhodia, Inc., 983 So. 2d 798.

134 citing documents.

Andre Perkins v. Tricia N. Guidry, M.D. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
Perkins v. Guidry 191 So. 3d 1182 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
Adams v. Rhodia, Inc., 07-2110 (La.5/21/08), .
Terri Sayre v. Pnk (Lake Charles), LLC D/B/A L'Auberge Du Lac La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
Sayre v. PNK (Lake Charles), LLC 188 So. 3d 428 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
provide correct principles of law for the jury to apply to those issues.” Adams v. Rhodia, Inc., 07-2110, p. 6 (La.5/21/08), .
Sherry Wedgeworth, Et Ux. v. Tynes E. Mixon, III, M.D. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
Wedgeworth v. Mixon 184 So. 3d 876 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
Adams v. Rhodia, Inc., 07-2110 (La.5/21/08), .
Red Willow Offshore, LLC v. Palm Energy Offshore LLC 185 So. 3d 293 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
Adams v. Rhodia, 07-2110, p. 10 (La.5/21/08), -07 ; Westcott v. Westcott, 08-1339, pp. 15-16 (La.App.
Brammer v. Bossier Parish School Board 183 So. 3d 606 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
Adams v. Rhodia, Inc., 07-2110 (La.05/21/08), ; Simmons v. Christus Schumpert Medical Center, 45,908 (La.App.2d Cir.06/15/11), , writs denied, 11-1592, 11-1591 (La.10/07/11), .
Chicago Property Interests, L.L.C. v. Broussard 177 So. 3d 1074 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2015
Adams v. Rhodia, Inc., 07-2110,' p. 6 (La.5/21/08), .
Solomon v. American National Property & Casualty Co. 175 So. 3d 1024 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
Adams v. Rhodia, Inc., 07-2110 (La.5/21/08), .
Fecke v. Board of Supervisors 180 So. 3d 326 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Wooley, 61 So.3d at 574 (citing Adams v. Rhodia, Inc., 07-2110 (La.5/21/08), .).
Show & Tell of New Orleans, L.L.C. v. Fellowship Missionary Baptist Church 171 So. 3d 1136 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
| u“Adequate jury instructions are those which fairly and reasonably point out the issues and which provide correct principles of law for the jury to apply to those issues.” Adams v. Rhodia, 07-2110, p. 6 *1144 (La.5/21/08), .
Matranga v. Parish Anesthesia of Jefferson, LLC 170 So. 3d 1077 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Under Louisiana law, “an appellate court must exercise great restraint before it reverses a jury verdict because of erroneous jury instructions.” Adams v. Rhodia, Inc., 07-2110 (La.05/21/08), .
Bourg v. Cajun Cutters, Inc. 174 So. 3d 56 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Adams v. Rhodia, Inc., 07-2110 (La.5/21/08), .
Larrea v. Cefalu 162 So. 3d 1224 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
“The trial court is responsible for reducing the possibility of confusing the jury and may exercise the right to decide what law is applicable and what law the trial court deems inappropriate.” Adams v. Rhodia, Inc., 2007-2110 p. 5-6 (La.5/21/08), .
Wayne D. Lagrappe v. Progressive Security Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
5/21/08), the supreme court determined that when reviewing jury instructions, “the manifest error standard for appellate review may not be ignored unless the jury charges were so incorrect or so inadequate as to preclude the jury from reaching a verdict based on the law and facts.” Therefore, the court concluded that
LaGrappe v. Progressive Security Insurance Co. 154 So. 3d 1263 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
In Adams v. Rhodia, Inc.,- 07-2110, p. 7 (La.5/21/08), , the supreme court determined that when reviewing jury instructions, “the manifest error standard for appellate review may not be ignored unless the jury charges were so incorrect or so inadequate as to preclude the jury from reaching a verdict based on the law and facts.” Therefore, the court concluded that “th
Blake v. City of Port Allen 167 So. 3d 781 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Adams v. Rhodia, Inc., 07-2110 (La.5/21/08), .
Marie Monte v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
Monte v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co. 139 So. 3d 1139 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
provide correct principles of law for the jury to apply to those issues.” Adams v. Rhodia, Inc., 07-2110, p. 6 (La.5/21/08), .
Aymami v. St. Tammany Parish Hospital Service District No. 1 145 So. 3d 439 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Adams v. Rhodia, Inc., 07-2110 (La.5/21/08), .
Hazel Richard Savoie v. Alice T. Richard La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
5/21/08), )(alteration in original).
Savoie v. Richard 137 So. 3d 78 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Wooley v. Lucksinger, 09-571, 09-584, 09-585, 09-586, pp. 81-82 (La.4/1/11), (quoting Adams v. Rhodia, Inc., 07-2110, p. 6 (La.5/21/08), )(alteration in original).
Williams v. Board of Supervisors of University of Louisiana System 135 So. 3d 804 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
Adams v. Rhodia, 07-2110 (La.05/21/08), ; Simmons v. Christus Schumpert Medical Center, 45,-908 (La.App.2d Cir.06/15/11), .
Scarberry v. Entergy Corp. 136 So. 3d 194 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
See Adams v. Rhodia, Inc., 07-2110, p. 7 (La.5/21/08), .
Sacco v. Paxton 133 So. 3d 213 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Wooley v. Lucksinger, 2009-0571, p. 81 (La.4/1/11), (citing Adams v. Rhodia, Inc., 2007-2110, p. 6 (La.5/21/08), ).
Oleszkowicz v. Exxon Mobil Corp. 129 So. 3d 1272 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2013
Adams v. Rhodia, Inc., 07-2110 (La.5/21/08); .
Maw Enterprises, L.L.C. v. City of Marksville La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
MAW Enterprises L.L.C. v. City of Marksville 128 So. 3d 575 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Adams v. Rhodia, Inc., 07-2110 (La.5/21/08), .
Felicia Clement v. Scott A. Citron La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
5/21/08), (citations omitted).
Clement v. Citron 115 So. 3d 1260 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Adams v. Rhodia, Inc., 07-2110, p. 13-14 (La.5/21/08), (citations omitted).
Murphy Cormier Contractor, Inc. v. State of La., Dept. of Health & Hospitals La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
Murphy Cormier General Contractor, Inc. v. State, Department of Health & Hospitals 114 So. 3d 567 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
See Adams v. Rhodia, Inc., 07-2110 (La.5/21/08), .
Brecheen v. News Group, L.P. 105 So. 3d 1011 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Adams v. Rhodia, Inc., 07-2110 (La.5/21/08), .
Willis v. Noble Drilling (US), Inc. 105 So. 3d 828 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Bcm, L.L.C. v. Roy Clifton Cheatwood La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
5/21/08), -05 (citations 5 omitted), the supreme court discussed the law and principles applicable to a trial court‟s responsibility when instructing a jury and the responsibility of appellate courts when reviewing those instructions, stating: Louisiana Code of C
Willis v. Meilleur 96 So. 3d 1259 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
In Adams v. Rhodia, Inc., 07-2110 (La.5/21/08), , the Supreme Court stated: ^Adequate jury instructions are those which fairly and reasonably point out the issues and which provide correct principles of law for the jury to apply to those issues.
Gregory Mouton v. Encompass Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
Simmons v. Christus Schumpert Medical Center 71 So. 3d 407 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
In Adams v. Rhodia, Inc., 2007-2110 (La.5/21/08), , the Supreme Court stated: Adequate jury instructions are those which fairly and reasonably point out the issues and which provide correct principles of law for the jury to apply to those issues.
Carl Jones, Sr. v. Centerpoint Energy Entex La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
Jones v. Centerpoint Energy Entex 66 So. 3d 539 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
An intervening cause will relieve the original tortfeasor of liability if it *550 “superceded the original negligence and alone produced the injury.” Adams v. Rhodia, Inc., 07-2110, p. 14 (La.5/21/08), .
Johnson v. Morehouse General Hospital 63 So. 3d 87 La. 2011
Adams v. Rhodia, Inc., 07-2110 (La.5/21/08), (citing RESTATEMENT (SECOND) OF TORTS § 440 (1965); 1 DAN B. DOBBS, THE LAW OF TORTS § 186 (2001)).
Sherrie L. Lafleur v. Shelter Mutual Insurance Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
5/21/08), -7: The issue to be resolved by the reviewing court is not whether the trier of fact was right or wrong, but whether the factfinder’s conclusion was a reasonable one.
Wooley v. Lucksinger 61 So. 3d 507 La. 2011
“The trial court is responsible for reducing the possibility of confusing the jury and may exercise the right to decide what law is applicable and what law the trial court deems inappropriate.” Adams v. Rhodia, Inc., 2007-2110 p. 5-6 (La.5/21/08), .
Wegener v. Lafayette Insurance Co. 60 So. 3d 1220 La. 2011
Adams v. Rhodia, Inc. 2007-2110 (La.5/21/08), ; Nicholas v. Allstate Insurance Company, 1999-2522 (La.8/31/00), .
Petrie v. Michetti 59 So. 3d 430 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
Adams v. Rhodia, Inc., 07-2110 (La.5/21/08), .
Joseph v. Archdiocese of New Orleans 52 So. 3d 203 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
4 Cir. 9/1/10), , in which we stated: “Since we have not found an erroneous [jury] instruction, we are surely not authorized to review the facts of this case de novo.” See also Adams v. Rhodia, Inc., 07-2110, pp. 6-7, 10 (La.5/21/08), .
Burns v. CLK Investments V, L.L.C. 45 So. 3d 1152 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
See also Adams v. Rhodia, Inc., 07-2110, p. 7 (La.5/21/08), (“Furthermore, the manifest error standard for appellate review may not be ignored unless the jury charges were so incorrect or so inadequate as to preclude the jury from reaching a verdict based on the law and facts.”); Dede v. Tip’s Development, L.L.C., 09-0199, p. 3 (La.App.
Dupre & Son Floor Covering, Inc. v. City of Iota La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
Dupre & Son Floor Covering, Inc. v. City of Iota 36 So. 3d 1117 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
See Adams v. Rhodia, Inc., 07-2110 (La.5/21/08), .