DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Copeland v. Copeland, 966 So. 2d 1040.

18 citing documents.

  • Mark P. Glago v. Stacy P. Glago La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2024
    10/16/07), (Copeland II).
  • Keshawn Patterson v. Tacarra Charles La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2019
    10/16/07), (“Copeland II”).17 The order sealing the transcript stated that the hearing conducted with L.J.
  • Stevens v. St. Tammany Parish Gov't 264 So. 3d 456 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
  • Ehlinger v. Ehlinger 251 So. 3d 418 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
  • Barnett v. La. Med. Mut. Ins. Co. 248 So. 3d 594 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2018
    10/16/07), , 1044, citing Title Research Corp. v. Rausch , , 941 (La.
  • Indep. Weekly, LLC v. Atkins 241 So. 3d 1118 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
    10/16/07), , 1044 ( Copeland II ).
  • William Henry Shane v. the Parish of Jefferson, State of Louisiana, and the Jefferson Parish Economic Development Commission 209 So. 3d 726 La. 2015
    Louisiana’s Public Records Law contains a broad definition of “public | ^records.” Copeland v. Copeland, 07-0177 (La.10/16/07), .
  • Naik v. United Rentals, Inc. 182 So. 3d 223 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
    Copeland v. Copeland, 2007-0177 (La.10/16/07), .
  • Yount v. Handshoe 171 So. 3d 381 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2015
    “The right to inspect judicial records should not trump the individual’s privacy rights, especially where the purpose is to gratify 114spite, promote public scandal, or to publicize the embarrassing details of a divorce case.” Copeland v. Copeland, 07-0177 (La.10/16/07), .
  • Szwak v. Szwak 163 So. 3d 911 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
    Copeland v. Copeland, 07-0177 (La.10/16/07), ; In re Kemp, 45,028 (La.App.2d Cir.03/03/10), , writ denied, 10-0755 (La.06/25/10), .
  • Dipaola v. Municipal Police Employees' Retirement System 155 So. 3d 49 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
  • Shane v. Parish of Jefferson 150 So. 3d 406 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    Copeland v. Copeland, 07-0177 (La.10/16/07), (citing Bester v. Louisiana Supreme Court Committee on Bar Admissions, 00-1360 (La.2/21/01), ).
  • State v. Webb 144 So. 3d 971 La. 2014
    Copeland v. Copeland, 07-0177, p. 10 (La.10/16/07), .
  • Vagelos v. Abramson 126 So. 3d 639 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    The Louisiana Supreme Court directly addressed the rights of litigants to have court records sealed in Copeland v. Copeland, 06-1023 (La.6/2/06), (“Copeland I ”) and Copeland v. Copeland, 07-0177 (La.10/16/07), (“Copeland II”), which involved the high profile divorce proceedings of restaurant mogul, Alvin Copeland.
  • Opelousas General Hospital Authority v. Fairpay Solutions, Inc. 118 So. 3d 1269 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    art. 191; Copeland v. Copeland, 07-0177 (La.10/16/07), .
  • In re Lee 90 So. 3d 1030 La. 2012
    See Copeland v. Copeland, 07-0177 (La.10/16/07), (holding that the entire record of a custody matter must be unsealed, with only very limited and specific information redacted for the safety and protection of the parties’ minor children); Copeland v. Copeland, 06-1023 (La.6/2/06), (holding that a court entering a protective order “must ensure that its
  • In Re Kemp 32 So. 3d 1050 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
    Copeland v. Copeland, 2007-0177 (La.10/16/07), ; Davis v. Davis, 43,490 (La.App.2d Cir.10/22/08), .
  • Davis v. Davis 997 So. 2d 149 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    Copeland v. Copeland, 07-0177 (La.10/16/07), .