Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Gray v. American Nat. Property & Cas. Co., 977 So. 2d 839.

163 citing documents.

Luther v. IOM Co. 109 So. 3d 467 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
Gray v. American National Property & Casualty Co., 2007-1670 (La.2/26/08), .
Miccol Enterprises, Inc. v. City of New Orleans 106 So. 3d 746 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Co., 07-1670, p. 6 (La.2/26/08), (quoting Supreme Serv.
Robert T. Barousse v. Ford Motor Company, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
2/26/08), (quoting Supreme Serv.
Rickey Whittington, Jr. v. Qbe Specialty Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
2/26/08), (quoting Supreme Serv.
Whittington v. QBE Specialty Insurance Co. 105 So. 3d 797 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Co., 07-1670, p. 6 (La.2/26/08), (quoting Supreme Serv.
Morrison v. USAA Casualty Insurance Co. 106 So. 3d 95 La. 2012
Co., 07-1670 (La.2/26/08), .
Dozier v. Okoorkwo 82 So. 3d 516 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
Co., 07-1670, p. 6 (La.2/26/08), ; See La.
Dennis Garcia Et Ux v. Anthony D. Stalsby La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
Co., 07-1670, p. 6 (La.2/26/08), (quoting Supreme Serv.
Garcia v. Stalsby 78 So. 3d 873 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
Co., 07-1670, p. 6 (La.2/26/08), (quoting Supreme Servs.
Hall v. Federated Mutual Insurance 80 So. 3d 727 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
Co., 07-1670 (La.2/26/08), , the supreme court further defined its earlier ruling in Duncan to hold that the form must be completed prior to signing by the insured in order to constitute a valid rejection: We now hold that compliance with the form prescribed by the Insurance Commissioner involves more than the rote completion of the “six tasks”
Natchitoches Parish Police Jury v. Natchitoches Sportsman's Association La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
Naddia Melder, Et Ux. v. State Farm Mutual Automobile ins.co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
2/26/08), the supreme court elaborated on the importance of completing the form before it is submitted to the insured for signature.
Melder v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 66 So. 3d 603 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
In Gray v. American National Property & Casualty Co., 07-1670, p. 14 (La.2/26/08), , the supreme court elaborated on the importance of completing the form before it is submitted to the insured for signature.
Phillips v. Bush 67 So. 3d 1264 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
Co., 07-1670 (La.2/26/08), n. 2 , the Court stated: Following Duncan , this court acknowledged in Carter v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins.
Tillman v. USAgencies Casualty Insurance Co. 58 So. 3d 1009 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
Co., 2007-1670, p. 6 (La.2/26/08), , citing Supreme Serv.
Rosa Calvert v. Travelers Property Casualty Insurance Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
2/26/08), (quoting Supreme Serv.
Calvert v. Travelers Property Casualty Insurance Co. 56 So. 3d 453 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
Co., 07-1670, p. 6 (La.2/26/08), (quoting Supreme Serv.
Willie Mae Scott v. Lafayette Consolidated Government - Risk Management Division La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
2/26/08), (quoting Supreme Serv.
Scott v. Lafayette Consolidated Government-Risk Management Division 52 So. 3d 1068 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Co., 07-1670, p. 6 (La.2/26/08), (quoting Supreme Serv.
Katina Maria Guidry v. Glazer's Distributors of Louisiana, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
2/26/08), (quoting Supreme Serv.
Bordelon v. Western Heritage Insurance Co. 48 So. 3d 421 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Co., 2007-1670 (La.2/26/08), , the Louisiana Supreme Court recognized the inherent danger in allowing an insurance agent or insurance company employee to complete a UM selection form after it leaves the hands of an insured or insured's representative stating: *427 “...
Susana Carola Piligra v. Americas Best Value Inn La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
2/26/08), (quoting Supreme Serv.
Piligra v. America's Best Value Inn 49 So. 3d 479 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Co., 07-1670, p. 6 (La.2/26/08), (quoting Supreme Serv.
Washington v. Allstate Insurance Co. 44 So. 3d 792 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Co., 07-1670, p. 11 n. 2 (La.2/26/08), , 847 n. 2, the supreme court stated: Following Duncan , this court acknowledged in Carter v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins.
Taylor v. US AGENCIES CAS. INS. CO. 38 So. 3d 433 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Co., 07-1670, pp. 8-9 (La.2/26/08), .
Taylor v. U.S. Agencies Casualty Insurance Co. 38 So. 3d 433 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Co., 07-1670, pp. 8-9 (La.2/26/08), .
Judith Langlinais Mistich v. Louisiana Farm Bureau Casualty Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
2/26/08), (quoting Supreme Serv.
Mistich v. Weeks 24 So. 3d 300 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Co., 07-1670, p. 6 (La.2/26/08), (quoting Supreme Serv.
Schiro v. ACADIAN AMBULANCE SERVICE, INC. 25 So. 3d 256 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2009
Co., 07-1670, p. 6 (La.2/26/08), , quoting Supreme Serv.
Herrera v. United Fire & Casualty Co. 27 So. 3d 919 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Co., 07-1670, p. 6 (La.2/26/08), .
Keen v. Ashley 21 So. 3d 987 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
& Cas., 2007-1670 (La.2/26/08), .
Thibodeaux v. Field 15 So. 3d 384 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Martha B. Bonin v. Brian A. Verret La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
Bonin v. Verret 15 So. 3d 1236 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Co., 07-1670 (La.2/26/08), .
Flores v. Doe 19 So. 3d 1196 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Co., 07-1670 (La.2/26/08), , 849 where the Court held: [Compliance with the form prescribed by the Insurance Commissioner involves more than the rote completion of the “six tasks” identified in Duncan by someone at sometime.
Patricia Ashmore v. Stephen P. McBride La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
2/26/08), with regard to the six tasks identified in Duncan, that because “Insurance Commissioner Bulletin LIRC 98-03 provides as follows: ‘In the case where a policy number is not available, the space for the policy number may be left blank or a binder number may be inserted,’” only five “tasks” must be completed for
Ashmore v. McBride 11 So. 3d 720 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
The supreme court later observed in a footnote in Gray v. American National Property & Casualty Co., 07-1670, p. 11 (La.2/26/08), , with regard to the six tasks identified in Duncan , that because “Insurance Commissioner Bulletin LIRC 98-03 provides as follows: ‘In the case where a policy number is not available, the space for the policy number may be left blank or a binder number may be inserted,”’ only five “tasks” must be completed for a
Triche v. Martin 13 So. 3d 649 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Property & Casualty Co., 07-1670 (La.2/26/08), .
Pyatt v. CALCASIEU PARISH SHERIFF'S OFFICE 7 So. 3d 891 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
Ashley Pyatt v. Calcasieu Parish Sheriff's Office La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
Wart v. Progressive Security Insurance Co. 7 So. 3d 865 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
Co., 2007-1670 (La.2/26/08), , 849: We now hold that compliance with the form prescribed by the Insurance Commissioner involves more than the rote completion of the “six tasks” identified in Duncan by someone at sometime.
Robinson v. Jefferson Parish School Board 9 So. 3d 1035 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2009
Co., 07-1670, p. 6 (La.2/26/08), (Citation omitted).
Jeanne M. Olson v. Rapides Parish Sheriff & Tax Assessor La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
Olson v. Rapides Parish Sheriff & Tax Assessor 7 So. 3d 797 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Co., 07-1670 (La.2/26/08), .
Dixon v. DIRECT GENERAL INS. CO. OF LA. 12 So. 3d 357 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Gray v. American Nat'l Property & Cos. Co., 07-1670, p. 6 (La.2/26/08), , see La.
Dixon v. Direct General Insurance Co. of Louisiana 12 So. 3d 357 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
gment on a motion for summary judgment, it applies the de novo standard of review, “using the same criteria that govern the trial court’s consider *360 ation of whether summary judgment is appropriate, ie., whether there is a genuine issue of material fact and whether the mover is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.” Gray v. American Nat’l Property & Cos. Co., 07-1670, p. 6 (La.2/26/08), , see La.
Patricia Davis v. Fortis Benefits Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
2/26/08), (quoting Supreme Serv.
Davis v. Fortis Benefits Ins. Co. 6 So. 3d 929 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Co., 07-1670, p. 6 (La.2/26/08), (quoting Supreme Serv.
Bernstein v. Powerhouse Gym of Metairie, Inc. 9 So. 3d 254 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
& Cos. Co., 2007-1670 (La.2/26/08), .; Irula v. Jean, 06-927 (La.App.
Kurz v. Milano 6 So. 3d 916 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Co., 2007-1670 (La.2/26/08), .