Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Calloway, 1 So. 3d 417.

278 citing documents.

State v. Mollerberg 260 So. 3d 599 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
1/21/09), , 418 (per curiam).
State v. Vaughn 259 So. 3d 1048 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
1/21/09), , 418 (per curiam).
State v. Brooks 258 So. 3d 944 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
1/21/09), , 418 (per curiam).
State v. Livous 259 So. 3d 1036 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
1/21/09), , 422 ( per curiam ).
State v. Folse 258 So. 3d 53 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
1/21/09), , 418 (per curiam).
State v. Folse 258 So. 3d 188 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
1/21/09), , 418 (per curiam).
State v. Howard 258 So. 3d 66 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
1/21/09), , 418 (per curiam).
State v. Dufrene 251 So. 3d 1114 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
1/21/09), , 418 (per curiam).
State v. Kitts 250 So. 3d 939 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
1/21/09), , 418 (per curiam).
State v. Malarcher 249 So. 3d 837 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
1/21/09), , 418 (per curiam).
State v. Nixon 250 So. 3d 273 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
1/21/09), , 418 (per curiam).
State v. Coleman 249 So. 3d 872 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
1/21/09), , 418 (per curiam).
State v. Magee 243 So. 3d 151 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
1/21/09), , 418 (per curiam).
State v. Martin 243 So. 3d 56 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
State v. James 243 So. 3d 717 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
1/21/09), , 418 (per curiam).
State of Louisiana v. Darryl Jones La. 2018
2781, 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979), “does not permit a reviewing court to substitute its own appreciation of the evidence for that of the fact finder or to second guess the credibility determinations of the fact finder necessary to render an honest verdict.” State v. Calloway, 07–2306, p. 10 (La.1/21/09)
State v. Cousin 240 So. 3d 954 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
1/21/09), , 418 ( per curiam ).
State v. Banks 240 So. 3d 963 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
State of Louisiana v. Charles C. Keene La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
State v. Keene 230 So. 3d 1012 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
State v. Lutz 235 So. 3d 1114 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
State v. Johnson 244 So. 3d 617 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
01/21/09), ; State v. Matthews , 50,838 (La.
State v. White 228 So. 3d 213 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
State v. Golden 223 So. 3d 4 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
State v. Dyson 222 So. 3d 220 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
1/21/09), (per curiam ).
State v. Walker 221 So. 3d 951 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
1/21/09), ; State v. Matthews, supra.
State v. Mouton 219 So. 3d 1244 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
State v. Wilson 220 So. 3d 35 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
1/21/09), (per curiam ); (La.
State v. Dickerson 218 So. 3d 633 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
State of Louisiana v. Elsa Rangel La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
1/21/09), the supreme court stated the following regarding a jury’s rejection of a defendant’s hypothesis of innocence: [W]e have repeatedly cautioned that due process, rational fact finder test of Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307, 99 S.Ct.
State v. Green 211 So. 3d 683 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
State v. Dunn 208 So. 3d 954 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
State v. Hoang 207 So. 3d 473 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
State v. Joseph 208 So. 3d 1036 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
State v. Heard 208 So. 3d 535 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
State v. White 206 So. 3d 387 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
State v. Rodgers 202 So. 3d 1187 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
State v. Flowers 204 So. 3d 271 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
1/21/09), (per curiam)', State v. Mire, 2014-2295 (La.
State v. Gardner 204 So. 3d 265 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
State v. Toliver 205 So. 3d 948 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
State v. Caminita 203 So. 3d 1100 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
State v. Matthews 200 So. 3d 895 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
nally rejects the exculpatory hypothesis of innocence offered by a defendant’s own testimony, an appellate court’s task in reviewing the sufficiency of the evidence under the Due Process Clause is at an end unless an alternative hypothesis “is sufficiently reasonable that a rational juror could not ‘have found proof of guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.”’ State v. Calloway, 2007-2306 (La.1/21/09), , citing Captville, supra, and Jackson v. Virginia, supra.
State v. Thomas 192 So. 3d 291 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2016
See State v. Callo-way, 07-2306 (La.1/21/09); .
State v. McKinney 194 So. 3d 699 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
See State v. Calloway, 07-2306 (La.1/21/09), (per curiam).
State v. Bland 194 So. 3d 679 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
See State v. Calloway, 2007-2306 (La.1/21/09), (per curiam).
State v. Cotton 194 So. 3d 69 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
See State v. Calloway, 2007-2306 (La.1/21/09), (per *76 curiam).
State of Louisiana v. Mark Wayne Thibodeaux La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
1/21/09), the supreme court stated: 4 [W]e have repeatedly cautioned that due process, rational fact finder test of Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307, 99 S.Ct.
State v. Thibodeaux 190 So. 3d 426 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
In State v. Calloway, 07-2306, p. 10 (La.1/21/09), , the supreme court stated: lt;[W]e have repeatedly cautioned that due process, rational fact finder test of Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307 , 99 S.Ct.
State v. Eby 248 So. 3d 420 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
1/21/09), , 422 ( per curiam ).
State of Louisiana v. Eric Johnson aka/eric Dwayne Johnson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
1/21/09), (citations omitted).