DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Calloway, 1 So. 3d 417.

278 citing documents.

  • State v. Johnson 186 So. 3d 348 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
    "A reviewing court may intrude on the plenary discretion of the fact finder “only to the extent necessary to guarantee the fundamental protection of due process of law.” State v. Calloway, 07-2306, p. 10 (La.1/21/09), (citations omitted).
  • State v. Law 189 So. 3d 1164 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
    State v. Calloway, 07-2306 (La.1/21/09), (per curiam).
  • State v. Wallace 185 So. 3d 795 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    See State v. Calloway, 2007-2306 (La.1/21/09), (per curiam).
  • State v. Johnson 185 So. 3d 822 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    See State v. Calloway, 2007-2306 (La.1/21/09), (per curiam).
  • State v. Nealon 179 So. 3d 661 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
    State v. Calloway, 07-2306 (La.1/21/09), .
  • State v. Hernandez 177 So. 3d 342 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2015
    See State v. Calloway, 07-2306 (La.1/21/09); .
  • State v. Alexander 182 So. 3d 126 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    See State v. Calloway, 07-2306 (La.1/21/09), (per curiam).
  • State v. Ferguson 181 So. 3d 120 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    See State v. Calloway, 2007-2306 (La.1/21/09), (per curiam ).
  • State of Louisiana v. Willie James Robertson 172 So. 3d 616 La. 2015
    2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979), “does not permit a reviewing court to substitute its own appreciation of the evidence for that of the fact finder or to second guess the credibility determinations of the fact finder necessary to render an honest verdict.” State v. Calloway, 07-2306, p. 10 (La.1/21/09), .
  • State v. Bias 167 So. 3d 1012 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    State v. Calloway, 07-2306 (La.1/21/09), (per curiam).
  • State v. Daigle 167 So. 3d 980 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    See State v. Calloway, 07-2306 (La.1/21/09), (per curiam).
  • State v. Carter 167 So. 3d 970 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    See State v. Calloway, 07-2306 (La.1/21/09), (per curiam).
  • State v. Gorman 166 So. 3d 356 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    See State v. Calloway, 2007-2306 (La.1/21/09), (per curiam).
  • State v. Moyers 167 So. 3d 740 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    State v. Calloway, 2007-2306 (La.1/21/09), (per curiam).
  • State v. Robinson 150 So. 3d 900 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    See State v. Calloway, 07-2806, pp. 1-2 (La.1/21/09), .
  • State v. Zeno 155 So. 3d 4 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    State v. Calloway, 2007-2306 (La.1/21/09), (per curiam).
  • State v. Dominguez 148 So. 3d 648 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    State v. Calloway, 07-2306 (La.1/21/09), .
  • State v. Graham 148 So. 3d 601 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    See State v. Calloway, 07-2306, pp. 1-2 (La.1/21/09), (per curiam).
  • State of Louisiana v. Tony Jackson, AKA Leoanrdo Jackson, AKA Leon Jackson, AKA Leonardo Marice Jackson, AKA Leonard … La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
  • State v. Jackson 146 So. 3d 631 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    State v. Calloway, 07-2806 (La.1/21/09), .
  • State v. Elkins 138 So. 3d 769 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
    State v. Calloway, 2007-2306 (La.1/21/09), ; State v. Carey, 47,650 (La.App.
  • State v. Magee 143 So. 3d 532 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    See State v. Calloway, 2007-2306 (La.1/21/09), (per curiam).
  • State v. Lavy 142 So. 3d 1000 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    State v. Calloway, 07-2306, pp. 1-2 (La.1/21/09), (per cu-riam).
  • State in the Intrest C. V. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
  • State of Louisiana v. Ronald Pete La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
    A reviewing court may intrude on the plenary discretion of the fact finder “only to the extent necessary to guarantee the fundamental protection of due process of law.” State v. Calloway, 07-2306, p. 10 (La.1/21/09), (citations omitted).
  • State v. Pete 134 So. 3d 196 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    A reviewing court may intrude on the plenary discretion of the fact finder “only to the extent necessary to guarantee the fundamental protection of due process of law.” State v. Calloway, 07-2306, p. 10 (La.1/21/09), (citations omitted).
  • State ex rel. C.V. 134 So. 3d 211 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    1 Cir. 2/10/12) , (an unpublished opinion) (citing State v. Calloway, 07-2306 (La.1/21/09), ).
  • State v. Huey 142 So. 3d 27 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    See State v. Calloway, 2007-2306 (La.1/21/09), (per curiam).
  • State v. Hager 131 So. 3d 1090 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    See, State v. Calloway, 07-2306 (La.1/21/09), .
  • State v. Richey 128 So. 3d 1143 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    See, State v. Calloway, 07-2306 (La.1/21/09), .
  • State v. Alfaro 128 So. 3d 515 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    See State v. Callo-way, 07-2306 (La.1/21/09), .
  • State v. Morgan 119 So. 3d 817 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    State v. Calloway, 07-2306 (La.1/21/09), (per curiam).
  • State v. Petitto 116 So. 3d 761 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    See, State v. Calloway, 07-2306 (La.1/21/09), (per curiam).
  • State v. Welch 115 So. 3d 490 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    See State v. Calloway, 2007-2306 (La.1/21/09), (per curiam).
  • State v. Bourgeois 113 So. 3d 225 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    See State v. Calloway, 2007-2806 (La.1/21/09), (per curiam).
  • State v. Merrill 105 So. 3d 264 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    See State v. Calloway, 07-2306 (La.1/21/09), (per curiam).
  • State v. Clouatre 110 So. 3d 1094 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    See State v. Calloway, 2007-2306 (La.1/21/09), (per curiam).
  • State v. Davis 111 So. 3d 100 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    See State v. Calloway, 2007-2306 (La.1/21/09), (per curiam).
  • State v. Allen 101 So. 3d 41 La. 2012
    State v. Calloway, 07-2306, p. 10 (La.1/21/09), (“[W]e have repeatedly cautioned that the due process, rational fact finder test of Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307 , 99 S.Ct.
  • State v. T.T. 111 So. 3d 71 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    See State v. Calloway, 2007-2306 (La.1/21/09), (per curiam).
  • State ex rel. T.E. 91 So. 3d 292 La. 2012
    See, e.g., State v. Calloway, 07-2306, p. 10 (La.1/21/09), *295 422 (“[The] due process, rational fact finder test of Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307 , 99 S.Ct.
  • State of Louisiana v. S. R. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
    1/21/09), (citations omitted).
  • State of Louisiana v. K.W. T. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
    1/21/09), (citation omitted).
  • State v. Underdonk 92 So. 3d 369 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    \KState v. Calloway, 2007-2306 (La.1/21/09), (per curiam).
  • State v. Marrero 92 So. 3d 21 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    State v. Calloway, 2007-2306, pp. 1-2 (La.1/21/09), .
  • State of Louisiana v. Carlos Rios Cortes La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
    1/21/09), (citations omitted).
  • State v. Cortes 84 So. 3d 733 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    A reviewing court may intrude on the plenary discretion of the fact finder “only to the extent necessary to guarantee the fundamental protection of due process of law.” State v. Calloway, 07-2306, p. 10 (La.1/21/09), (citations omitted).
  • State v. Mosley 80 So. 3d 1164 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
    ly rejects the exculpatory hypothesis of innocence offered by a defendant’s own testimony, an appellate court’s task in reviewing the sufficiency of the evidence under the | sDue Process Clause is at an end unless an alternative hypothesis “is sufficiently reasonable that a rational juror could not ‘have found proof of guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.’ ” State v. Calloway, 2007-2306 (La.1/21/09), , citing Captville, supra, and Jackson v. Virginia, supra.
  • State of Louisiana v. F. F. Q. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
    1/21/09), (citations omitted).
  • State v. F.F.Q. 73 So. 3d 536 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    A reviewing court may intrude on the plenary discretion of the fact finder “only to the extent necessary to guarantee the fundamental protection of due process of law.” State v. Calloway, 07-2306, p. 10 (La.1/21/09), (citations omitted).