Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Williams, 977 So. 2d 1101.

19 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Arial Valencia-Lacayo La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2025
State of Louisiana v. Zachary Hunt La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2024
App. 4 Cir. 2/13/08), (internal citations omitted).
State v. Newsome 265 So. 3d 1223 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
4 Cir. 2/13/08), , 1109 (the prosecution must establish the admissibility of a purported confession by showing that it was voluntarily made), and State v. Bazile , , 353 (La.1980) (on a motion to suppress, the burden of proof shifts to the prosecution to prove the admissibility of evidence once the defendant makes an ini
State v. Kisack 190 So. 3d 806 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
State v. King 184 So. 3d 215 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
2/13/08), (internal citations omitted), “ ‘reasonable suspicion’ to stop is something less than probable cause for an arrest; a reviewing court must look to thé facts and circumstances of each case to determine whether a detaining officer had sufficient facts within his knowledge to justify an infringement of the suspect’
State v. Boyles 157 So. 3d 1170 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
4 Cir. 2/13/08), (internal citations omitted), “ ‘reasonable suspicion’ to stop is something less than probable cause for an arrest; a reviewing court must look to the facts and circumstances of each case to determine whether a detaining officer had sufficient facts within his knowledge to justify an infringement of the suspect’s
State v. Robertson 136 So. 3d 1010 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
4 Cir. 2/13/08), (internal citations omitted), “ ‘reasonable suspicion’ to stop is something less than probable cause for an arrest; a reviewing court must look to the facts and circumstances of each case to determine whether a detaining officer had sufficient facts within his knowledge to justify an infringement of the suspect’
State v. Buckley 120 So. 3d 819 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Spells 116 So. 3d 1011 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Cureaux 116 So. 3d 833 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
4 Cir. 2/13/08) , ; State v. Handy, 2002-1025 (La.App.
State v. Sipp 104 So. 3d 648 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State v. Harris 98 So. 3d 903 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State v. Williams 74 So. 3d 1208 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
4 Cir. 2/13/08) , ; State v. Handy, 02-1025 (La.App.
State v. Francis 60 So. 3d 703 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Pecot 54 So. 3d 1174 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
State v. MARZETT 40 So. 3d 1204 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2010
State v. Brown 36 So. 3d 974 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
4 Cir. 2/13/08), (the prosecution must establish the admissibility of a purported confession by showing that it was voluntarily made), (on a motion to suppress, the burden of proof shifts to the prosecution to prove the admissibility of evidence once the defendant makes an initia
State v. Robinson 33 So. 3d 1019 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
State v. Dowell 17 So. 3d 523 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2009