DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Dunn, 974 So. 2d 658.

27 citing documents.

  • State of Louisiana v. Delands Brown La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
  • State Of Louisiana v. David Brown La. 2022
    1/25/08), a case in which three men robbed a bank while armed with weapons and fatally wounded two tellers.
  • State of Louisiana v. Edwin Albert Miller La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
  • State v. Miller 269 So. 3d 806 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
  • State v. Robertson 239 So. 3d 268 La. 2018
    1/25/08), , 662 (because the legislature has not enacted a procedure for post-sentencing Atkins claims, the law in such cases remains as it was when Williams was decided).
  • State of Louisiana v. Jeffrey Clark 220 So. 3d 583 La. 2016
  • State v. Chester 208 So. 3d 338 La. 2016
    1/25/08), (because the legislature has not enacted a procedure for post-sentencing Atkins claims, the law in such cases remains as it was when Williams was decided), .
  • State of Louisiana v. Calvin Louis Noel, III AKA - Calvin Noel La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
    1/25/08), the supreme court discussed the standard for reviewing the denial of challenges for cause: A trial court is vested with broad discretion in ruling on challenges for cause, and its rulings will be reversed only when a review of the voir dire record as a whole reveals an abuse of discre
  • State v. Noel 181 So. 3d 223 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    137 , 166 L.Ed.2d 100 (2006), overruled on other grounds by State v. Dunn, 07-878 (La.1/25/08), , the supreme court discussed the standard for reviewing the denial of challenges for cause: A trial court is vested with broad discretion in ruling on challenges for cause, and its rulings will be reversed only when a review Of the voir dire record as a whole reveals an abuse of discretion.
  • State of Louisiana v. Harold Lee Julien, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
    1/25/08), the supreme court discussed the trial court’s role in determining whether a prospective juror should be excused for cause from the jury panel, as follows: A trial court is vested with broad discretion in ruling on challenges for cause, and its rulings will be reversed only when a review of
  • State v. Julien 139 So. 3d 1152 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    137 , 166 L.Ed.2d 100 (2006), overruled on other grounds by State v. Dunn, 07-878 (La.1/25/08), , the supreme court discussed the trial court’s role in determining whether a prospective juror should be excused for cause from the jury panel, as follows: A trial court is vested with broad discretion in ruling on challenges for cause, and its rulings will be reversed only *1167 when a review of the voir dire record
  • State v. Reeves 137 So. 3d 625 La. 2014
    This Court in State v. Dunn, 07-0878, p. 5 (La.1/25/08), , found that the statutory language used in La.C.Cr.P.
  • State of Louisiana v. Brian Segura La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
    1/25/08), the supreme court discussed the standard for reviewing the denial of challenges for cause: A trial court is vested with broad discretion in ruling on challenges for cause, and its rulings will be reversed only when a review of the voir dire record as a whole reveals an abuse of discre
  • State v. Segura 127 So. 3d 1034 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    137 , 166 L.Ed.2d 100 (2006), overruled on other grounds by State v. Dunn, 07-878 (La.1/25/08), , the supreme court discussed the standard for reviewing the denial of challenges for cause: A trial court is vested with broad discretion in ruling on challenges for cause, and its rulings will be reversed only when a review of the voir dire record as a whole reveals an abuse of discretion.
  • State v. Wallace 92 So. 3d 592 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    137 , 166 L.Ed.2d 100 (2006), overruled on other grounds by State v. Dunn, 07-878 (La.1/25/08), , the supreme court discussed the trial court’s role in determining whether a prospective juror should be excused for cause from the jury panel, as follows: A trial court is vested with broad discretion in ruling on challenges for cause, and its rulings will be reversed only when a review of the voir dire record as a
  • State v. Jacobs 67 So. 3d 535 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    137 , 166 L.Ed.2d 100 (2006), overruled in part on other grounds by State v. Dunn, 07-0878 (La.1/25/08), (per curiam).
  • State v. Dressner 45 So. 3d 127 La. 2010
    Overruled on other grounds by State v. Dunn, 07-0878 (La.1/25/08), .
  • State v. Dunn 41 So. 3d 454 La. 2010
    State v. Dunn, 07-878, p. 6 (La.1/25/08), .
  • State v. Bordelon 33 So. 3d 842 La. 2009
    at 1506 ; cf. State v. Dunn, 07-0878 (La.1/25/08), (retaining procedures set out in State v. Williams, 01-1650 (La.11/1/02), , including appointment of a sanity commissions, for resolving claims raised in a post-verdict, post-sentencing stage of a capital case that defendant is mentally retarded and so exempt from capital punishment under Atkins v. Virgi
  • Robertson v. Cain 17 So. 3d 960 La. 2009
    See State v. Dunn, 07-0878 (La.1/25/08), .
  • Robertson v. Cain 17 So. 3d 960 La. 2009
    See State v. Dunn, 07-0878 (La.1/25/08), .
  • State v. Mims 10 So. 3d 895 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
  • State v. Reeves 11 So. 3d 1031 La. 2009
    137 , 166 L.Ed.2d 100 (2006), overruled in part on other grounds, State v. Dunn, 2007-0878 (La.1/25/08), ; -471 (La.1980).
  • STATE EX REL. TART v. State 3 So. 3d 456 La. 2009
    See State v. Dunn, 02-0878, p. 7 (La.1/25/08), -63 .
  • State v. Holmes 5 So. 3d 42 La. 2008
    Like State v. Dunn, XXXX-XXXX (La.1/25/08), this case is now in a post-verdict procedural posture, and must be remanded.
  • State of Louisiana v. Damon Lee Harmon La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    1/25/08), the supreme court stated: This court has previously considered the fact that a family member is a convicted criminal a racially-neutral reason for excluding a prospective juror.
  • State v. Campbell 983 So. 2d 810 La. 2008
    [2] In State v. Dunn, XXXX-XXXX (La.1/25/08), , this Court held that La.