Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Eisenhardt v. Snook, 8 So. 3d 541.

37 citing documents.

John Klumpp and Susan Klumpp Versus Ochsner Clinic Foundation D/B/A Ochsner Health Systems La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2024
3/17/09), Dauzat v. Curnest Guillot Logging Inc., 08-528 (La.
Leslie Mentel Versus Iris Baltz Margavio Wife of/and Todd Michael Margavio and Xyz Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2022
03/17/09), Dauzat v. Curnest Guillot Logging Inc., 08-528 (La.
Sharon Creager Versus Marrero Land and Improvement Association Limited La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2022
03/17/09), Dauzat v. Curnest Guillot Logging Inc., 08-528 (La.
Marolyn Morange Versus Gwendolyn Troxler and Larry Troxler, Jr and Louisiana Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2021
Thomas C. Dufreche v. Jeffrey Wayne Coco, Md and Internal Medicine Specialists, Inc. La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2020
3/17/09), (citing Ambrose v. New Orleans Police Dep’t Ambulance Service, 1993-3099, (La.
Christine Perrin v. Ochsner Baptist Medical Center, LLC, and Abc Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2019
3/17/09), see also Broussard v. State ex rel.
Taylor v. Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. 263 So. 3d 910 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
Eskine v. City of Gretna 240 So. 3d 338 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
Carroll v. Allstate Ins. 244 So. 3d 772 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
Hooper v. Brown 171 So. 3d 995 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
See Eisenhardt v. Snook, 08-1287, p. 7 (La.3/17/09), , (La.
D.M.S. v. I.D.S. 225 So. 3d 1127 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
An appellate court “must be cautious not to re-weigh the evidence or to substitute its own factual findings for those of the trial court.” Eisenhardt v. Snook, 08-1287, p. 6 (La.3/17/09), .
Beggs v. Harrah's New Orleans Casino 158 So. 3d 917 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Eisenhardt v. Snook, 2008-1287, p. 5 (La.3/17/09), .
Hobgood v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 156 So. 3d 1244 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Id., quoting Eisenhardt v. Snook, 08-1287, p. 6 (La.3/17/09), .
Stevens v. City of Shreveport 152 So. 3d 1071 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
Eisenhardt v. Snook, 2008-1287 (La.3/17/09), ; Dowdy v. City of Monroe, 46,693 (La.App.2d Cir.11/2/11), ; Williams v. Ruben Residential Properties, LLC, supra.
Hampton v. Mid-City Plaza South, L.L.C. 140 So. 3d 804 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
Eisenhardt v. Snook, 2008-1287 (La.3/17/09), .
Medical Review Panel Proceedings for the Claim of Serpas v. Tulane University Hospital & Clinic 161 So. 3d 726 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
As the Louisiana Supreme Court has instructed, “an appellate court must be cautious not to re-weigh the evidence or to substitute its own factual findings just because it would have decided the case differently.” Eisenhardt v. Snook, 08-1287, pp. 6-7 (La.3/17/09), (citing Ambrose v. New Orleans Police Dep’t Ambulance Service, 93-3099 (La.7/5/94), ); Pinsonneault v. Merchants & Farmers Bank & Trust Co., 01-2217, p. 11 (La.4/3/02), .
Hammond v. Rahsaana 135 So. 3d 1207 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Eisenhardt v. Snook, 08-1287, p. 6 (La.3/17/09), .
Christiano v. Southern Scrap Recycling 131 So. 3d 1059 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Eisenhardt v. Snook, 08-1287 (La.3/17/09), .
Falcone v. Touro Infirmary 129 So. 3d 641 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Pryor , 10-1683, pp. 3-4, 60 So.3d at 596 (citing Eisenhardt v. Snook, 08-1287 (La.3/17/09), ; Dauzat v. Curnest Guillot Logging, Inc., 08-0528 (La.12/2/08), .)
Currie v. Scottsdale Indemnity Co. 123 So. 3d 742 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Eisenhardt v. Snook, 08-1287 (La.3/17/09), (per curium), wherein the plaintiff slipped on some garbage residue that had been spilled on the steps of his girlfriend's apartment where he lived.
Broussard v. State ex rel. Office of State Buildings 113 So. 3d 175 La. 2013
at pp. 7-8 (citing Eisenhardt v. Snook, 08-1287, p. 7 (La.3/17/09), -45 (per curiam); Williams v. City of Baton Rouge, 02-0682, p. 5 (La.App.
Markus Trautmann, Et Ux. v. Charles G. Fitzgerald La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
Trautmann v. Fitzgerald 113 So. 3d 429 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Ei-senhardt v. Snook, 08-1287 (La.3/17/19), .
Gailey v. Barnett 106 So. 3d 625 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Eisenhardt v. Snook, 08-1287, pp. 5-6 (La.3/17/09), -45 .
Handy v. City of Kenner 97 So. 3d 539 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Eisenhardt v. Snook, 08-1287 (La.3/17/09), ; Dauzat v. Curnest Guillot Logging, Inc., 08-0528 (La.12/2/08), .
Caserta v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 90 So. 3d 1042 La. 2012
Eisenhardt v. Snook, 08-1287 (La.3/17/09), ; Dauzat v. Curnest Guillot Logging, Inc., 08-0528 (La.12/2/08), .
Labit v. Palms Casino & Truck Stop, Inc. 91 So. 3d 540 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
4 Cir. 6/11/08) , ; see also Eisenhardt v. Snook, 08-1287 (La.3/17/09), *545 (slip and fall negligence action was characterized as a premises liability action using the standard of “unreasonably dangerous”).
Bates v. Louisiana National Guard Armory 86 So. 3d 21 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
art. 2317; Eisenhardt v. Snook, 2008-1287 (La.3/17/09), .
Boye v. Daiquiris & Creams No. 3, Inc. 80 So. 3d 505 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
12/2/08), ; and Eisenhardt v. Snook, 08-1287 (La.3/17/09), .
GARCIE v. Pasquier 70 So. 3d 11 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
Eisenhardt v. Snook, 08-1287 (La.3/17/09), .
McGee v. Mutter 67 So. 3d 517 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
Id, As the Supreme Court explained in Eisenhardt v. Snook, 08-1287, pp. 5-6 (La.3/17/09), , 544-45: [W]e have recognized that defendants generally have no duty to protect against an open and obvious hazard.
Warren v. Kenny 64 So. 3d 841 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
Summarizing the applicable substantive law regarding the duty of a landowner, the Louisiana Supreme Court in Eisenhardt v. Snook, 08-1287, pp. 5-6 (La.3/17/09), -45 , stated: It is well-settled that a landowner owes a duty to a plaintiff to discover any unreasonably dangerous conditions, and to either correct the condition or warn of its existence.
Williams v. Ruben Residential Properties, LLC 58 So. 3d 534 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
The city cites Eisenhardt v. Snook, 2008-1287 (La.3/1/09), : “[Defendants generally have no duty to protect against an open and obvious hazard.
Burns v. CLK Investments V, L.L.C. 45 So. 3d 1152 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Eisenhardt v. Snook, 08-1287, p. 6 (La.3/17/09), -545 (emphasis supplied); Blank v. Capdeville, 94-373, p. 4 (La.App.
Vanna Darlene McManus, Etc. v. State of La., Dept. of Wildlife and Fisheries La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
3/17/09), -45, our supreme court stated: It is well-settled law that a landowner owes a duty to a plaintiff to discover any unreasonably dangerous conditions, and to either correct the condition or warn of its existence.
McManus v. State, Dept. of Wildlife & Fisheries 33 So. 3d 412 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
5In Eisenhardt v. Snook, 08-1287, pp. 5-6 (La.3/17/09), -45 , our supreme court stated: It is well-settled law that a landowner owes a duty to a plaintiff to discover any unreasonably dangerous conditions, and to either correct the condition or warn of its existence.
Wallace v. Howell 30 So. 3d 217 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Eisenhardt v. Snook, 08-1287, p. 6 (La.3/17/09), .