Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Dejoie v. Medley, 9 So. 3d 826.

34 citing documents.

John Vajas v. Kevin Morris La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2025
Cassie Mae Rogers v. City of Bossier City La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2025
Catherine Evans, Et Al. v. Abubaker, Inc., Et Al. La. 2024
5/5/09), (“If he does not so respond, summary judgment, if appropriate, shall be rendered against him.”).
Jean Agenor and Marie Toussant Versus Christy Suarez, Progressive Insurance Company and State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2024
Louisiana State University Board of Supervisors Through Louisiana State University v. Jasmine L. Lewis La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2023
Zachary Marcade Versus New York Marine and General Insurance Company and Nola Motor Club, L.L.C. La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2023
Leticia Taylor v. Angela Swift La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
Deutsche Bank Trust Company, N.A. v. Kenneth Wayne Vidrine La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
Nancy Anderson; Joy Manguno; Jayme Songy, as Curator for Malvina Songy; And Janice Verdin, as Responsible Party of … La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2022
Reginald Martin v. Rodney Thomas, Greer Logging, Llc and National Liability And Fire Insurance Company La. 2022
Byline Bank v. Alexandria Hospitality Partners La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
Yolande Schexnayder & Son, Inc. Versus Parish of St. James La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2022
Terrance Bolden, Heidi Bolden, And Taylor Bolden Vs. La. 2022
5/5/09), Samaha v. Rau, 07-1726, p. 5 (La.
Ann Marie Auricchio And Patrick Hogan v. Lyneigh J. Harriston La. 2021
Brenda Bergeron , Individually An D On Behalf Of Her La. 2021
Leontine Moran Versus Rouse's Enterprises, LLC and Great American Alliance Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2019
5/5/09), Faget v. Faget, 10-188 (La.
Murphy v. Savannah 246 So. 3d 785 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2018
In re Medical Review Panel Proceedings of Glover 229 So. 3d 655 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
5/5/09), ; Faget v. Faget, 10-188 (La.
Danielle Larson v. Xyz Insurance Company 226 So. 3d 412 La. 2017
art. 967(B); see also Dejoie v. Medley, 2008- 2223 (La.5/5/09)
Radcliffe 10, L.L.C. v. Ronald G. Burger and Lynda O. Burger 219 So. 3d 296 La. 2017
It is well established that “[t]he starting point for the interpretation of any statute is the language of the statute itself.” Dejoie v. Medley, 2008–2223 (La.5/5/09)
In Re: Judge Darryl A. Derbigny Orleans Parish Criminal District Court State of Louisiana 219 So. 3d 1041 La. 2017
DeJean v. Purpera 199 So. 3d 11 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2016
49:308 and Dejoie v. Medley, 08-2223, pp. 8-9 (La.5/5/09), , such a finding does not mean that such funds are thereby deemed to- be the personal funds of the justice of the peace.
Felo v. Ochsner Medical Center-Westbank, LLC 182 So. 3d 417 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Dejoie v. Medley, 08-2223 (La.5/5/09), see La.
Roy Bufkin, Jr. v. Felipe's Louisiana, LLC 171 So. 3d 851 La. 2014
See Cheramie Services, Inc. v. Shell Deepwater Production, Inc., 35 So.3d at 1059 ; Dejoie v. Medley, 08-2223 (La.5/5/09), (“If he |12does not so respond, summary judgment, if appropriate, shall be rendered against him.”).
Scheuermann v. Rosch 151 So. 3d 648 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
10/30/2009), , citing Dejouie v. Medley, 08-2223 (La.5/5/09), , wherein the Supreme Court held that when a statute is clear and unambiguous and its application does not lead to absurd consequences, the provision is applied as written with no further interpretation made in search of the Legislature's intent.
Sibley v. Blue Cross Blue Shield of Louisiana 142 So. 3d 1022 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
1:4; Dejoie v. Medley, 08-2223 (La.5/5/09), .
Wells v. Fandal 136 So. 3d 83 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
2 Cir. 12/20/06), , rev’d on other grounds, 08-2223 (La.5/5/09), (judges en banc were decision-makers but not juridical persons capable of being sued).
Hilbert v. Miley 136 So. 3d 847 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Dejoie v. Medley, 08-2223 (La.5/5/09), ; see LSAC.C.
Luther v. Iom Co. 130 So. 3d 817 La. 2013
See also Dejoie v. Medley, 2008-2223 (La.5/5/09), .
Doe v. Louisiana Board of Ethics 112 So. 3d 339 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
See Dejoie v. Medley, 08-2223 (La.5/5/09), .
Succession of Faget v. Faget 53 So. 3d 414 La. 2010
It is well established that “[t]he starting point for the interpretation of any statute is the language of the statute itself.” Dejoie v. Medley, 2008-2223 (La.5/5/09), .
Hays v. Louisiana State Board of Elementary & Secondary Education 39 So. 3d 818 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Foti , 09-0093 at p. 6, 27 So.3d at 817 ; Dejoie v. Medley, 08-2223, P. 6 (La.5/5/09), .
Silverman v. MIKE ROGERS DRILLING CO., INC. 34 So. 3d 1099 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
Dejoie v. Medley, 2008-2223 (La.5/5/09), .
Foti v. Holliday 27 So. 3d 813 La. 2009
Dejoie v. Medley, 08-2223 (La.5/5/09), .