Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Watters v. Department of Social Services, 15 So. 3d 1128.

33 citing documents.

Pvca, Inc. and Renola Equity Fund II, LLC v. Pacific West Td Fund, Lp, Louisiana Citizens Property Insurance … La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2022
Inga Barre-Williams, Wife of/and Raymond Julius Williams, Individually and on Behalf of Their Minor Child, Raymond Joseph Williams … La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2021
App. 4 Cir. 6/17/09), (citing Tipton v. Campbell, 08-0139, pp. 26-28 (La.
Earl Alphonso v. v. Exxon Mobil Exxon Mobil Risk Management, Inc. La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2020
4 Cir. 6/17/09), (citations omitted).
Ryan Delatte and George Lander v. Strickland Properties, LLC, James C. Strickland, III, Ghx Industrial, LLC, Ghx Holdings, … La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2020
Marty Melerine and Oyster Fisheries, Inc. v. Tom's Marine & Salvage, LLC, Tom's Welding, Inc., Triple T Marine, … La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2020
Magri v. Jazz Casino Co. 275 So. 3d 352 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
App. 4 Cir. 6/17/09), , 1155.
Yaukey v. Ballard 267 So. 3d 183 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
App. 4 Cir. 6/17/09), , 1143, writs denied , 09-1651 (La.
Montgomery v. Garry Lewis Props. 256 So. 3d 391 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
App. 4th Cir. 6/17/09), , 1142-43, writs denied , 09-1651, 09-1638 (La.
Lyle v. Brock Servs., LLC 252 So. 3d 1010 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
App. 4th Cir. 6/17/09), , 1141, writ denied , 2009-1651 (La.
Fie, LLC v. New Jax Condo Ass'n, Inc. 241 So. 3d 372 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
App. 4 Cir. 6/17/09), , 1162.
Guidry v. Dow Chemical Co. 214 So. 3d 78 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
4 Cir. 6/17/09), , as follows: General causation refers to proving exposure in a dose sufficient to cause health effects—that exposure to mold can cause disease.
Two Canal Street Investors, Inc. v. New Orleans Building Corp. 202 So. 3d 1003 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
4 Cir. 6/17/09) , ; BcL.cf Supervisors of Louisiana State University and Agr.
Burch v. SMG, Schindler Elevator Corp. 191 So. 3d 652 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
Reddoch v. Parish of Plaquemines 134 So. 3d 683 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Scarberry v. Entergy Corp. 136 So. 3d 194 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Zacher v. Harrah's New Orleans Management Co. 136 So. 3d 132 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
4 Cir. 6/17/09) , (citing Snearl v. Mercer, 99-1738, 99-1739, p. 11 (La.App.
Wellman v. Tufail 136 So. 3d 51 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
4 Cir. 6/17/09), ; Jeansonne v. Schmolke, 2009-1467 (La.App.
Board of Supervisors of Louisiana State University & Agricultural & Mechanical College v. 1732 Canal Street, L.L.C. 133 So. 3d 109 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
4 Cir. 6/17/09) , , as follows: A trial court has great discretion in awarding costs (including expert witness fees) and can only be reversed on appeal upon a showing of an abuse of that discretion.
In re Certain St. Bernard Parish Government Computer Disks v. St. Bernard Parish Government ex rel. Ponstein 130 So. 3d 56 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
4 Cir. 6/17/09), ) (internal citations omitted).
DePodesta v. Breaux 116 So. 3d 1017 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Landix v. Blunt 112 So. 3d 376 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
River Garden Apartments v. Robinson 108 So. 3d 352 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Hendrick v. Patterson 109 So. 3d 475 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
4th Cir.6/17/09), , writs denied, 2009-1651, 2009-1638 (La.10/30/09), , 293; Russell v. Snelling Personnel, 2001-2134 (La.App.
Watters v. Department of Social Services 109 So. 3d 401 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
4 Cir. 6/17/09) , , we analyzed all the facts and evidence presented at trial and the findings of the district court, concluding that the class members had sufficiently proved general causation.
Cahn v. Cox 101 So. 3d 1031 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
4 Cir. 6/17/09), , (citing Snearl v. Mercer, 99-1738, 99-1739, p. 11 (La.App.
Hendrix v. Maison Orleans I, L.L.C. 101 So. 3d 1013 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
4 Cir. 6/17/09) , , this Court set forth the law regarding taxing of costs, as follows: A trial court has great discretion in awarding costs (including expert witness fees) and can only be reversed on appeal upon a showing of an abuse of that discretion.
Marshall v. Air Liquide-Big Three, Inc. 107 So. 3d 13 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Sassone v. Doe 96 So. 3d 1243 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
4 Cir. 6/17/09), , citing Rosell, supra 549 So.2d at 844 (La.1989).
Watters v. Department of Social Services 102 So. 3d 118 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
4 Cir. 6/17/09) , , holding that the class representatives have met their burden of proving specific causation.
Hooper v. Travelers Insurance Co. 74 So. 3d 1202 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
4 Cir. 6/17/09) , , causation in a toxic mold case must be proven on five levels: “(i) the presence of mold, (ii) the cause of the mold and the relationship of that cause to a specific defendant, (iii) actual exposure to the mold, (iv) the exposure was a dose sufficient to cause health effects (general causation), and (v) a sufficient
Scaglione v. Juneau 41 So. 3d 1287 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2010
Jeansonne v. SCHMOLKE 40 So. 3d 347 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
COTTINGIM v. Vliet 19 So. 3d 26 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2009