Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Fearheiley, 979 So. 2d 487.

20 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Jamarkus Ardoin La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2025
4/18/08), see also State v. Greenberry, 14-1126, p. 1 (La.
State Of Louisiana v. Jessie James Baker La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2021
State of Louisiana v. Corey Stevenson La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2019
4/18/08), –89 (the officers were justified in detaining a defendant where they observed an apparent hand-to-hand transaction although the officer could not see what either person had in his or her hand); State v. Campbell, 93-1959, p. 11 (La.
State v. McMasters 251 So. 3d 1139 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
4/18/08), , 488 ) ], [ State v. ] Cure [11-2238 (La.
State v. Crucia 181 So. 3d 751 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
1st Cir.6/9/06), -55 , writ denied, 2006-2466 (La.4/27/07), , (citing State v. Huntley, 97-0965, (La.3/13/98), (per curiam)).- In State v. Fearheiley, 2008-0307 (La.4/18/08), (per curiam), the Louisiana Supreme Court found thát a police officer’s observation of an apparent brief hand-to-hand transaction inside a vehicle gave rise to reasonable suspicion for an investigatory stop.
State v. Rapp 161 So. 3d 103 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
in the transaction had paid off a debt she owed him, did not require the police officer to turn a blind eye to the circumstances and ignore what two years of experience in narcotics investigations, encompassing 15 to 20 arrests, had taught him, that in the narcotics trade, “when it’s done outside, it’s done very fast from one hand to the next.” State v. Fearheiley, 08-0307, pp. 1-2 (La.4/18/08), -89 (per curiam).
State v. Gross 145 So. 3d 521 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
In State v. Fearheiley, 08-307 (La.4/18/08), (per curiam), the Louisiana Supreme Court found that a police officer’s observation of an apparent |abrief hand-to-hand transaction inside a vehicle gave rise to reasonable suspicion for an investigatory stop because the officer was not “required to turn a blind eye to the circumstances and ignore what two years of ex
State v. Hall 134 So. 3d 671 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
See also State v. Pratt, 08-1819 (La.9/4/09), (quoting State v. Fearhei-ley, 08-0307, p. 2 (La.4/18/08), , in reversing a trial court’s grant of a motion to suppress, noting that "[p]olice officer's observation of apparent brief hand-to-hand transaction inside a vehicle gave rise to reasonable suspicion for an investigatory stop ...”).
State v. Howard 120 So. 3d 831 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
The State cites State v. Fearheiley, 08-0307 (La.4/18/08), , in support.
State v. Ulmer 116 So. 3d 1004 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Fearheiley, 08-0307, pp. 1-2 (La.4/18/08), -89 .
State v. Bush 90 So. 3d 395 La. 2012
See State v. Fearheiley, 08-0307, pp. 1-3 (La.4/18/08), -489 (La.2008) (finding sufficient justification for an investigatory stop when “the police officer observed the independent, yet complementary and simultaneous actions by two parties” who displayed “no apparent purpose ...
State v. Sander 69 So. 3d 730 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
The standard to determine whether a sufficient basis for a legal stop existed was set out in State v. Fearheiley, 08-0307, pp. 1-2 (La.4/18/08), , 488: While the police may not detain individuals on the basis of an “ ‘inchoate and unparticularized suspicion or “hunch,” ’ ” United States v. Sokolow, 490 U.S. 1, 7 , 109 S.Ct.
State v. Kirton 66 So. 3d 431 La. 2011
State v. Fearheiley, 08-0307, p. 1 (La.4/18/08), .
State v. Johnson 52 So. 3d 110 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Inin State v. Fearheiley, 08-0307 (La.4/18/08), (per curiam), the Louisiana Supreme Court found that a police officer’s observation of an apparent brief hand-to-hand transaction inside a vehicle gave rise to reasonable suspicion for an investigatory stop because the officer was not “required to turn a blind eye to the circumstances and ignore what two years of expe
State v. McMillan 30 So. 3d 36 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
See also State v. Temple, 02-1895 (La.9/9/03), (holding that reasonable suspicion for a stop was more than “looking nervous” and sitting on a porch in a “high crime area.”); State v. Fearheiley, 08-0307 (La.4/18/08), (holding that a police officer’s observation of a apparent brief hand-to-hand transaction inside a vehicle gave rise to reasonable suspicion for an investigatory stop because the officer was not “required to turn a blind eye to the circumstances and ignore what two years of experien
State v. Pratt 16 So. 3d 1163 La. 2009
State v. Fearheiley, 08-0307, p. 2 (La.4/18/08), (Police officer’s observation of apparent brief hand-to-hand transaction inside a vehicle gave rise to reasonable suspicion for an investigatory stop because he was not required “to turn a blind eye to the circumstances and ignore what two years of experience in narcotics investigations ...
State v. Schnyder 10 So. 3d 303 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
In State v. Fearheiley, 08-0307 (La.4/18/08), -89 , the Louisiana Supreme Court found reasonable suspicion existed for an investigatory stop where the police officer observed an apparent hand-to-hand transaction even though the officer “could not see what either person had in his or her hand.” The court noted the apparent exchange lasted no more than 15 to 20
State v. BURKETTE 5 So. 3d 315 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
4/18/08), (per curiam) ("[t]hat the encounter had other possible innocent explanations ...
State v. Kelley 8 So. 3d 684 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
See, State v. Fearheiley, 08-307 (La.4/18/08), (per curiam ).
State v. Sam 988 So. 2d 765 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
In State v. Fearheiley, 08-307 (La.4/18/08), , an officer observed the defendant engage in an apparent hand-to-hand transaction, but was unable to determine what was exchanged.