Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Shirley, 10 So. 3d 224.

31 citing documents.

  • State of Louisiana v. Wanda Ledet La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2026
  • State of Louisiana v. John Noehl and Analise Noehl La. 2025
  • State of Louisiana v. Kelvin Atkins La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2025
    5/5/09), (noting that “although…an individual detained in a Terry stop based on reasonable suspicion has had his freedom of movement curtailed in a significant way, until an arrest actually occurs, these Fourth Amendment seizures do not constitute custody for Miranda purposes.”).
  • State of Louisiana v. Jamarkus Ardoin La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2025
    5/5/09), -29 (observing that hearsay rules do not apply in a hearing on a motion to suppress evidence).
  • State Of Louisiana v. Rickey Lionel Laurant La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2024
  • State of Louisiana v. Kenneth Wayne Owens La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2024
    5/5/09), State v. Evans, supra.1 Further, police officers may take the necessary precautions to protect themselves.
  • State Of Louisiana v. Jered C. Sellers La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2024
  • State of Louisiana v. Tristen J. Lamons La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
  • State of Louisiana v. Orlando Brown La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2022
  • State of Louisiana v. Quintravuis Holloway La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2022
  • State Of Louisiana v. Steven Ray Mccarthy La. 2021
  • State v. Bates 246 So. 3d 672 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2018
  • State ex rel. D.H. 214 So. 3d 92 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
    5/5/09), , citing Stansbury v. California, 511 U.S. 318 , 114 S.Ct.
  • State v. Fletcher 209 So. 3d 689 La. 2017
  • State ex rel. W.B. 206 So. 3d 974 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
    5/5/09), ; 11 see also State v. Fisher, 97-1133, p. 6 (La.
  • State of Louisiana v. Joseph Taylor 217 So. 3d 283 La. 2016
  • State v. Lewis 187 So. 3d 24 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
    See State v. Shirley, 08-2106 (La.5/5/09), (holding that hearsay testimony is admissible at a suppression hearing).
  • State v. Jenkins 174 So. 3d 1152 La. 2015
    See State v. Shirley, 08-2106 (La.5/5/09), -29 .
  • State v. Estes 168 So. 3d 847 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    State v. Shirley, 08-2106, pp. 8-10 (La.5/5/09), -30 .
  • State v. Altenberger 139 So. 3d 510 La. 2014
    See e.g., Garcia, 09-1578, pp. 18-22, 108 So.3d at 15-18 ; see also State v. Shirley, 08-2106 (La.5/5/09), (the rules of evidence normally applicable in criminal trials do not operate with full force at hearings before the judge to determine the admissibility 118of evidence); La.Code Evid.
  • State v. Evans 130 So. 3d 406 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
    Answers to non-custodial questioning at the scene “are admissible without Miranda warnings.” State v. Shirley, 2008-2106 (La.5/5/09), .
  • State v. Caliste 131 So. 3d 902 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    See State v. Shirley, 08-2106 (La.5/5/09), ; State v. Washington, 99-1111 (La.App.
  • State v. Bentley 116 So. 3d 891 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    See, State v. Shirley, 08-2106, pp. 5-7 (La.5/5/09), -229 (hearsay rules do not apply in hearings on motions to suppress evidence); State v. Lee, 11-0398, p. 6 (La.App.
  • State v. Welch 115 So. 3d 490 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    State v. Shirley, 2008-2106 (La.5/5/09), .
  • State v. Letell 103 So. 3d 1129 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    State v. Shirley, 2008-2106 (La.5/5/09), .
  • State v. Chisolm 99 So. 3d 48 La. 2012
    See State v. Shirley, 08-2106 (La.5/5/09); (hearsay testimony was admissible in a suppression hear *49 ing).
  • State v. Thornton 83 So. 3d 1024 La. 2012
    This Court has consistently held that Miranda warnings are not required when the law officer is making a general, on-thej5eene5 investigation to determine whether there has been the commission of a crime, and, if so, by whom.” (citations omitted); see, e.g., State v. Shirley, 08-2106, pp. 8-10 (La.5/5/09), -30 (Miranda warnings not required to admit defendant’s statements following an accident in which she flipped her car and killed her passenger that she did not see a stop sign and had had “two
  • State v. Lee 83 So. 3d 1191 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    See State v. Shirley, 08-2106, p. 4 (La.5/5/09), (“hearsay testimony is admissible in a suppression hearing”).
  • State v. Caccioppo 61 So. 3d 61 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    Defendant cites State v. Shirley, 08-2106 (La.5/5/09), , and State v. Amos, 97-1283 (La.App.
  • State v. Gill 30 So. 3d 1182 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
  • State v. Taylor 26 So. 3d 776 La. 2010
    104(A) and 1101(C)(1); State v. Shirley, 08-2106, pp. 5-7 (La.5/5/09), -29 .