Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Shirley, 10 So. 3d 224.
- State of Louisiana v. Wanda Ledet La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2026
- State of Louisiana v. John Noehl and Analise Noehl La. 2025
-
State of Louisiana v. Kelvin Atkins
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2025
5/5/09), (noting that “although…an individual detained in a Terry stop based on reasonable suspicion has had his freedom of movement curtailed in a significant way, until an arrest actually occurs, these Fourth Amendment seizures do not constitute custody for Miranda purposes.”).
-
State of Louisiana v. Jamarkus Ardoin
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2025
5/5/09), -29 (observing that hearsay rules do not apply in a hearing on a motion to suppress evidence).
- State Of Louisiana v. Rickey Lionel Laurant La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2024
-
State of Louisiana v. Kenneth Wayne Owens
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2024
5/5/09), State v. Evans, supra.1 Further, police officers may take the necessary precautions to protect themselves.
- State Of Louisiana v. Jered C. Sellers La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2024
- State of Louisiana v. Tristen J. Lamons La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
- State of Louisiana v. Orlando Brown La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2022
- State of Louisiana v. Quintravuis Holloway La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2022
- State Of Louisiana v. Steven Ray Mccarthy La. 2021
- State v. Bates 246 So. 3d 672 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2018
-
State ex rel. D.H.
214 So. 3d 92
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
5/5/09), , citing Stansbury v. California, 511 U.S. 318 , 114 S.Ct.
- State v. Fletcher 209 So. 3d 689 La. 2017
-
State ex rel. W.B.
206 So. 3d 974
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
5/5/09), ; 11 see also State v. Fisher, 97-1133, p. 6 (La.
- State of Louisiana v. Joseph Taylor 217 So. 3d 283 La. 2016
-
State v. Lewis
187 So. 3d 24
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
See State v. Shirley, 08-2106 (La.5/5/09), (holding that hearsay testimony is admissible at a suppression hearing).
-
State v. Jenkins
174 So. 3d 1152
La. 2015
See State v. Shirley, 08-2106 (La.5/5/09), -29 .
-
State v. Estes
168 So. 3d 847
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
State v. Shirley, 08-2106, pp. 8-10 (La.5/5/09), -30 .
-
State v. Altenberger
139 So. 3d 510
La. 2014
See e.g., Garcia, 09-1578, pp. 18-22, 108 So.3d at 15-18 ; see also State v. Shirley, 08-2106 (La.5/5/09), (the rules of evidence normally applicable in criminal trials do not operate with full force at hearings before the judge to determine the admissibility 118of evidence); La.Code Evid.
-
State v. Evans
130 So. 3d 406
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
Answers to non-custodial questioning at the scene “are admissible without Miranda warnings.” State v. Shirley, 2008-2106 (La.5/5/09), .
-
State v. Caliste
131 So. 3d 902
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
See State v. Shirley, 08-2106 (La.5/5/09), ; State v. Washington, 99-1111 (La.App.
-
State v. Bentley
116 So. 3d 891
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
See, State v. Shirley, 08-2106, pp. 5-7 (La.5/5/09), -229 (hearsay rules do not apply in hearings on motions to suppress evidence); State v. Lee, 11-0398, p. 6 (La.App.
-
State v. Welch
115 So. 3d 490
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Shirley, 2008-2106 (La.5/5/09), .
-
State v. Letell
103 So. 3d 1129
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State v. Shirley, 2008-2106 (La.5/5/09), .
-
State v. Chisolm
99 So. 3d 48
La. 2012
See State v. Shirley, 08-2106 (La.5/5/09); (hearsay testimony was admissible in a suppression hear *49 ing).
-
State v. Thornton
83 So. 3d 1024
La. 2012
This Court has consistently held that Miranda warnings are not required when the law officer is making a general, on-thej5eene5 investigation to determine whether there has been the commission of a crime, and, if so, by whom.” (citations omitted); see, e.g., State v. Shirley, 08-2106, pp. 8-10 (La.5/5/09), -30 (Miranda warnings not required to admit defendant’s statements following an accident in which she flipped her car and killed her passenger that she did not see a stop sign and had had “two
-
State v. Lee
83 So. 3d 1191
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
See State v. Shirley, 08-2106, p. 4 (La.5/5/09), (“hearsay testimony is admissible in a suppression hearing”).
-
State v. Caccioppo
61 So. 3d 61
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
Defendant cites State v. Shirley, 08-2106 (La.5/5/09), , and State v. Amos, 97-1283 (La.App.
- State v. Gill 30 So. 3d 1182 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
-
State v. Taylor
26 So. 3d 776
La. 2010
104(A) and 1101(C)(1); State v. Shirley, 08-2106, pp. 5-7 (La.5/5/09), -29 .