Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Williams, 992 So. 2d 983.
- State of Louisiana v. Richard Refund Spencer La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2026
- State of Louisiana v. Jarvis DeWayne Taylor La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2025
- State of Louisiana v. Dalston Mosley La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2025
- State of Louisiana v. Carlos Demond Ary La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2025
- State of Louisiana v. Rodriqus Harris La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2019
- State v. Vanhorn 268 So. 3d 357 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2019
- State v. Douglas 268 So. 3d 372 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2019
- State v. Clark 259 So. 3d 1178 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2018
-
State v. Carter
246 So. 3d 796
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2018
9/26/08), ("Specific intent to kill can be implied by the intentional use of a deadly weapon such as a knife or a gun.").
-
State v. Magee
243 So. 3d 151
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
9/26/08), , provided the following reasoning for allowing expert testimony in the field of firearm examination: The use of expert testimony to identify spent cartridge cases or bullets to a particular firearm has a long history in Louisiana and elsewhere and has been the subject of *164 Daubert [ v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals
- State ex rel. Williams v. State 222 So. 3d 712 La. 2017
- State v. McGill 213 So. 3d 1181 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
-
State v. Washington
188 So. 3d 350
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
State v. Fields, 42,761 (La.App.2d Cir.1/9/08), , writ denied, 08-0469 (La.9/26/08), .
-
State v. Winzer
151 So. 3d 135
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
State v. Fields, 42,761 (La.App.2d Cir.1/9/08), , writ denied, 08-0469 (La.9/26/08), .
- State of Louisiana v. Wardell Christopher Williams La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
-
State v. Williams
124 So. 3d 1236
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
2 Cir. 1/9/08), , writ denied, 08-465 (La.9/26/08), .
-
Explained
State v. Lindsey
69 So. 3d 566
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
As explained in State v. Williams, 42,914 (La.App.2d Cir.01/09/08), , writ denied, 2008-0465 (La.09/26/08), : Relevant evidence is evidence having any tendency to make the existence of any fact that is of consequence to the determination of the action more probable or less probable than it would be without the evidence.
- State of Louisiana v. Bacardny Wayne George La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
-
State v. George
19 So. 3d 614
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
2 Cir. 1/9/08), , writ denied, 08-469 (La.9/26/08), .