Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Gillmer v. Parish Sterling Stuckey, 30 So. 3d 782.

23 citing documents.

Thomas Anderson v. City of New Orleans La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2025
App. 1 Cir. 3 12/23/09), ).
Shanell Mary Lavigne v. Veronica "Vicky" Jones d/b/a Veronica "Vicky" Jones, Attorney at Law, LLC and XYZ Insurance … La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2024
App. 1 Cir. 12/ 23/ 09), n.2.
Adriel Smith and Shawn Smith v. Angelin Funderburk, Kristen Rene Hanna, ANPAC Louisiana Insurance Company, Metropolitan Property And … La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2021
App. 1st Cir. 12/ 23/ 09), 6 In her first, second, and fourth assignments of error, Ms. Smith' s primary argument is that USAA' s pleadings, writings, and actions, including the jury verdict form, pretrial order, and opening statement, indicated that there was no dispute about the UM status of the offending driver.
Michael Albarado, Individually v. Citgo Petroleum Corporation La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
1 Cir. 12/23/09), Glasper, supra (noting the factors to be considered in assessing quantum for pain and suffering are severity and duration).
Albarado v. Citgo Petroleum Corp. 247 So. 3d 818 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
1 Cir. 12/23/09) , , 788 ; Glasper, supra (noting the factors to be considered in assessing quantum for pain and suffering are severity and duration).
Emma Bradford v. Citgo Petroleum Corporation La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
1 Cir. 12/23/09), Glasper, supra (noting the factors to be considered in assessing quantum for pain and suffering are severity and duration).
Bradford v. Citgo Petroleum Corp. 237 So. 3d 648 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
1 Cir. 12/23/09) , , 788 ; Glasper , supra (noting the factors to be considered in assessing quantum for pain and suffering are severity and duration).
Neal v. Wascom 218 So. 3d 129 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
App. 1 Cir. 12/23/09), ; Thibodeaux v. USAA Cas.
Andersen v. Succession of Bergeron 217 So. 3d 1248 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
1 Cir. 12/23/09) , , 785 n.2.
Dean v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 217 So. 3d 611 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
1 Cir. 12/23/09) , , and Young v. Martinez, 98-674 (La.
Schwartzberg v. Guillory 213 So. 3d 1266 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
1 Cir. 12/23/09) , ; Thibodeaux v. USAA Cas.
Espinoza v. Doe 213 So. 3d 399 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
Jasmine Jones v. Progressive Security Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
1 Cir. 12/23/09), Glasper, supra (noting the factors to be considered in assessing quantum for pain and suffering are severity and duration).
Jones v. Progressive Security Insurance Co. 209 So. 3d 912 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
App. 1 Cir. 12/23/09), ; Glasper, supra (noting the factors to be considered in assessing quantum for pain and suffering are severity and duration).
Hebert v. Boesch 194 So. 3d 798 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
Chauncy v. Allen 191 So. 3d 25 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
1st Cir.12/23/09), -87 .
Watson v. Hicks 172 So. 3d 655 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
1 Cir. 12/23/09) , ; Glasper, supra (noting the factors to be considered in *678 assessing quantum for pain and suffering are severity and duration).
Lohenis v. Rousse 166 So. 3d 1020 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
1 Cir. 12/23/09) , , and Thibodeaux v. USAA Cas.
Interdiction of Sperandeo 104 So. 3d 142 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
1 Cir. 12/23/09) , , 785 n. 2.
Brodnax v. Foster 92 So. 3d 427 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
1st Cir. 12/23/09), ; Broussard v. Voorhies, 06-2306 (La.App.
Lozano v. Brown 60 So. 3d 669 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
1 Cir. 12/23/09), -88 , where the court found plaintiff sufficiently proved the underinsured status of the offending driver by submitting certified copies of the at-fault liability carrier’s declarations page and policy agreement, which established the monetary limits of the available liability coverage.
Tate v. Tate 42 So. 3d 439 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Thongsavanh v. Schexnayder 40 So. 3d 989 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
1st Cir.12/23/09), , and Thibo-deaux v. USAA Cas.

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by