Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite In Re Baer, 21 So. 3d 941.

17 citing documents.

  • In Re: Timothy A. Meche La. 2024
  • In Re: Albert A. Bensabat, III La. 2023
    11/20/09), the court explained: We have imposed sanctions ranging from actual periods of suspension to fully deferred suspensions in prior cases involving attorneys who drive while under the influence of alcohol.
  • In Re: Erin L. Tyrer La. 2023
    11/20/09), wherein the court indicated: “[A]s a general rule, we tend to impose an actual suspension in those instances in which multiple DWI offenses are at issue, as well as in cases in which the DWI stems from a substance abuse problem that appears to remain unresolved.” The committee noted that respondent engaged in on
  • In Re: Danminh Quy Mui La. 2022
    11/20/09), wherein we stated: We have imposed sanctions ranging from actual periods of suspension to fully deferred suspensions in prior cases involving attorneys who drive while under the influence of alcohol.
  • In Re: Stavros Panagoulopoulos La. 2022
  • In Re: George Randy Trelles La. 2022
    11/20/09), which involved an attorney who was twice arrested for DWI.
  • In Re: Joseph N. Mayer, III La. 2021
  • In Re: Kathleen M. Wilson La. 2021
  • In Re: Amy Elizabeth Bateman La. 2020
  • In Re: Paul E. Brown 252 So. 3d 468 La. 2018
    11/20/09), we stated the following with respect to appropriate sanctions for DWI offenses: 8 We have imposed sanctions ranging from actual periods of suspension to fully deferred suspensions in prior cases involving attorneys who drive while
  • In re Anzalone 219 So. 3d 311 La. 2017
    11/20/09), , In re: Guidry, 11-1208 (La.
  • In re Johnson 217 So. 3d 323 La. 2017
    11/20/09), , the court stated the following with respect to appropriate sanctions for DWI offenses: We have imposed sanctions ranging from actual periods of suspension to fully deferred suspensions in prior cases involving attorneys who drive while under the influence of alcohol.
  • In re Gill 181 So. 3d 669 La. 2015
    In recommending a sanction, the board relied upon In re: Baer, 09-1795 (La.11/20/09), .
  • In re Cassibry 131 So. 3d 22 La. 2013
    In recommending a sanction, the board relied upon In re: Baer, 09-1795 *26 (La.11/20/09), .
  • In re James 108 So. 3d 747 La. 2013
    |/Turning to the issue of an appropriate sanction, in light of respondent’s refusal to participate in LAP, the committee referenced two similar cases, In re: Baer, 09-1795 (La.11/20/09), , and In re: Guidry, 11-1208 (La.9/23/11), .
  • In Re Danny L. Guidry. 71 So. 3d 256 La. 2011
    In recommending a sanction, the board relied upon In re: Baer, 09-1795 (La.11/20/09), .
  • In re Hernandez 46 So. 3d 1244 La. 2010
    748 (La.10/2/09), (attorney who was declared ineligible to practice law and who failed to cooperate with the ODC in two investigations was suspended for one year and one Inday); In re: Hardy, 03-0443 (La.5/2/03), (holding that the baseline sanction for practicing law while ineligible to do so is a suspension for one year and one day); In re: Baer, 09-1795 (La.11/20/09), (an attorney who was twice arrested and charged with driving under the influ *1251 ence of alcohol was suspended for one year a