Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. LeBlanc, 41 So. 3d 1168.

41 citing documents.

State of Louisiana Versus Wendell L Lachney La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2024
State of Louisiana Versus Steven Ferraro La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2024
State of Louisiana Versus Odell Lee Robertson La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2024
State of Louisiana Versus Michael Anthony Short La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2024
State of Louisiana Versus Alvin Joseph Adams La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2024
State of Louisiana v. Tashonty C Toney La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2024
7/6/10), discussed the legislative history of the sentencing ranges for vehicular homicides as follows: Over the years, the legislature has steadily increased punishment for the crime, raising the maximum sentence to 15 years imprisonment in 1989 La.
State of Louisiana Versus Alexsy Mejia La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2023
State of Louisiana v. George McKinney, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
State of Louisiana v. Jaiden Kephart La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2023
7/6/10), State v. Fruge, 14-1172 (La.
State of Louisiana Versus Maurice Ervin La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2023
State of Louisiana Versus Galvin Marcus Bourgeois La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2023
State of Louisiana Versus Montana Hymel La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2023
7/6/10), -75, the Louisiana Supreme Court held that a sentence of the maximum term of thirty years imprisonment at hard labor, with three years without benefit of parole, was not excessive for a defendant convicted of vehicular homicide.
State of Louisiana v. LeDarron Demarion Carter La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2022
7/6/10), State v. Green, 418 So.
State of Louisiana v. Jorge Lopez Benavides La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2022
7/6/2010), the Supreme Court reversed the appellate court and reinstated a 30-year maximum sentence at hard labor for vehicular homicide with the first three years to be served without benefit of probation, parole, or suspension of sentence even though the defendant was a first offender with no prior record and the mother
State of Louisiana v. Solomon Burke Guillory, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
State of Louisiana v. Tashonty C Toney La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2021
7/6/10), to be pertinent to our review: When the legislature first enacted the crime of vehicular homicide, 1983 La.
State of Louisiana v. Brady Louis Vice, Sr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2021
State v. Wagnon 261 So. 3d 60 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
State of Louisiana v. Christopher Lee Wagnon La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
State of Louisiana v. Anthony Jack -Aka- Anthony Kwonskiee Jack La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
7/6/10), State v. Turner, 04-1250 (La.App.
State v. Jack 244 So. 3d 561 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
7/6/10), ; State v. Turner , 04-1250 (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Mark I. Gordon AKA Mark Gordon La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
State v. Gordon 240 So. 3d 301 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
State of Louisiana v. Blake Allen Shell -Aka- Blake A. Shell La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
State v. Shell 216 So. 3d 853 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
State of Louisiana v. Jason Bennett La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
State v. Bennett 208 So. 3d 898 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
State v. Lewis 147 So. 3d 1251 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
In State v. LeBlanc, 2009-1355 (La.7/6/10), , the Court found the maximum thirty year sentence was not excessive for a first offender mother of two convicted of vehicular homicide.
State of Louisiana v. John Boyd Baham La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
7/6/10), the defendant requests that his appeal be dismissed, and that he be allowed to seek review via writ application “once this appeal is complete.” In LeBlanc, the defendant entered a guilty plea to one count of vehicular homicide, a felony as defined in La.R.S.
State of Louisiana v. Aaron D. Blackwell La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
7/6/10), (thirty-year sentence for a first- offender defendant convicted of vehicular homicide who had eight drugs in her system at the time of the offense); State v. Kotrla, 08-364 (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Christopher Marshall, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
7/6/10), (citations omitted) ().
State v. Marshall 157 So. 3d 666 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Rather, we are mindful of the supreme court’s instruction that: “While comparisons with other similar cases ‘is useful in itself and sets the stage,’ the focus of sentence review remains on the character and propensities of the offender and the circumstances of the offense.” State v. LeBlanc, 09-1355, p. 10 (La.7/6/10), (citations omitted) ().
State v. Duncan 109 So. 3d 921 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
State v. LeBlanc, 2009-1355 (La.7/6/10), ; State v. Guzman, supra.
State of Louisiana v. Anthony Paul Lisotta, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
7/6/10), : First, there is a misjoinder of offenses in the bill of indictment.
State of Louisiana v. Edwin N. Rivera La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
State v. Lisotta 91 So. 3d 1247 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
3 Cir. 6/10/09), -28 , reversed on other grounds, 09-1355 (La.7/6/10), : First, there is a misjoinder of offenses in the bill of indictment.
State v. Oliphant 93 So. 3d 603 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
My appraisal of this sad case is buttressed to a great extent by a recent ruling of the Louisiana Supreme Court, State v. LeBlanc, 2009-1355 (La.7/6/10), .
State of Louisiana v. Jeffery Neal Deville La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
7/6/10), were similar to those in the instant case and supported the sentences imposed in the instant case.
State v. DEVILLE 74 So. 3d 774 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
The trial court opined, however, that the facts in State v. LeBlanc, 09-1355 (La.7/6/10), , were similar to those in the instant case and supported the sentences imposed in the instant case.
State v. White 68 So. 3d 508 La. 2011
The availability of early release options "is generally a relevant consideration in review of sentences for excessiveness,” State v. LeBlanc, 09-1355, p. 11 (La.7/6/10), .
State v. Ellis 67 So. 3d 623 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
“The availability of early release options is generally a relevant consideration in review of sentences for excessiveness.” State v. LeBlanc, 09-1355, p. 11 (La.7/6/10), , and Lockett v. Ohio, 438 U.S. 586, 605 , 98 S.Ct.

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by