Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Hunt, 25 So. 3d 746.

129 citing documents.

State v. Cooper 223 So. 3d 573 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
12/1/09), ( citing State v. Hampton, 98-0331, p.18 (La.
State of Louisiana v. Woodrow Karey, Jr., A/K/A Woodrow Karey, II La. 2017
State v. Nixon 222 So. 3d 123 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
State of Louisiana v. James J. Flournoy La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
ial court makes findings of fact based on the weight of the testimony and the credibility of the witnesses, a reviewing court owes those findings great deference, and may not overturn those findings unless there is no evidence to support those findings.” [State v.] Wells, 2008-2262, p. 4 [(La.7/6/10)]; 45 So.3d [577,] 580; State v. Hunt, 2009-1589, p. 6 (La.12/1/09)
State ex rel. W.B. 206 So. 3d 974 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
State v. Flournoy 209 So. 3d 150 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
“When a trial court makes findings of fact based on the weight of the testimony and the credibility of the witnesses, a reviewing court owes those findings great deference, and may not overturn those findings unless there is no evidence to support those findings.” [State v. ] Wells, 2008-2262, p. 4 [ (La.7/6/10) ]; 45 So.3d [577,] 580; State v. Hunt, 2009-1589, p. 6 (La.12/1/09), .
State v. Wilson 208 So. 3d 999 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
State in the Interest of J.J.M. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
See State v. Hunt, 2009-1589 (La.12/1/09)
State ex rel. J.J.M. 207 So. 3d 609 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
State v. Flowers 204 So. 3d 271 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
12/1/09), , If the defendant alleges police misconduct in eliciting a confession, it is incumbent upon the State to rebut these allegations specifically.
State v. Barnes 203 So. 3d 1090 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
State v. Matthews 191 So. 3d 1080 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
State v. Hunt, 09-1589 (La.12/1/09), .
State v. Ellis 195 So. 3d 480 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
State v. Hunt, 2009-1589 (La.12/1/09), .
State v. Lewis 187 So. 3d 24 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
State v. Thompson, 11 -0915 (La.5/8/12), ; State v. Wells, 08-2262 (La.7/6/10), ; State v. Hunt, 09-1589 (La.12/1/09), .
State v. Williams 185 So. 3d 817 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
See State v. Hunt, 2009-1589 (La.12/1/09), .
State ex rel. C.H. 183 So. 3d 567 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
See State v. Hunt, 2009-1589 (La.12/1/09), .
State v. Moultrie 182 So. 3d 1017 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
State v. Hunt, 09-1589 (La.12/1/09), .
State ex rel. T.W. 175 So. 3d 504 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
See also State v. Hunt, 09-1589 (La.12/1/09), n. 2 .
State v. Crucia 181 So. 3d 751 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
See State v. Hunt, 2009-1589 (La.12/1/09), .
State v. Cavalier 171 So. 3d 1117 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
State v. Thompson, 2011-0915, p. 14 (La.5/8/12), ; State v. Hunt, 2009-1589, p. 6 (La.12/1/09), .
State v. Daigle 167 So. 3d 980 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
See State v. Hunt, 09-1589 (La.12/1/09), .
State v. Carter 167 So. 3d 970 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
See State v. Hunt, 09-1589 (La.12/1/09), .
State v. Pounds 166 So. 3d 1037 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
See State v. Hunt, 09-1589 (La.12/1/09), .
State v. Bell 169 So. 3d 417 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
See State v. Hunt, 09-1589 (La.12/1/09), .
State ex rel. J.D. 154 So. 3d 726 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State v. Hunt, 2009-1589 (La.12/1/09), n. 2 (citing Miranda, supra).
State v. Fields 151 So. 3d 756 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Id., p. 14, 93 So.3d at 563 , citing State v. Hunt, 09-1589, p. 6 (La.12/1/09), .
State v. Zeno 155 So. 3d 4 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
See State v. Hunt, 2009-1589 (La.12/1/09), .
State v. Gross 145 So. 3d 521 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State v. Hunt, 09-1589 (La.12/01/09), .
State v. Taylor 143 So. 3d 1248 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
See State v. Hunt, 09-1589, p. 6 (La.12/1/09)
State v. Harris 140 So. 3d 1226 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
Wells, supra; State v. Hunt, 2009-1589 (La.12/01/09), .
State v. Gates 145 So. 3d 288 La. 2014
12/1/09); , we discussed the legal principles applicable to a motion to suppress where the contested search and seizure arose in connection with a traffic stop, as follows: It is undisputed tha[t] an individual’s constitutional protections from unreasonable search and seizures are triggered during an investigative traffic stop.
Sandra Hunter, Individually v. Christus Health Central Louisiana, Etc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
Hunter v. Christus Health Central Louisiana 137 So. 3d 1276 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
“When a trial court makes findings of fact based on the weight of the testimony and the credibility of the witnesses, a reviewing court owes those findings great deference, and may not overturn those findings unless there is no evidence to support those findings.” State v. Hunt, 09-1589, p. 6 (La.12/1/09), .
State v. Jefferson 140 So. 3d 235 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
4 Cir. 6/14/13), ; State v. Hunt, 09-1589, p. 6 (La.12/1/09), (citation omitted).
State v. Young 140 So. 3d 136 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State v. Hunt, 09-1589 (La.12/1/09), .
State v. Hall 134 So. 3d 671 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
“When a trial court makes findings of fact based on the weight of the testimony and the credibility of the witnesses, a reviewing court owes those findings great deference, and may not overturn those findings unless there is no evidence to support those findings.” Wells , 2008-2262, p. 4; 45 So.3d at 580 ; State v. Hunt, 2009-1589, p. 6 (La.12/1/09); .
State v. Leblanc 137 So. 3d 656 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
See State v. Hunt, 09-1589 (La.12/1/09), .
State v. Candebat 133 So. 3d 304 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State v. Hunt, 09-1589, p. 6 (La.12/1/09), , citing State v. Hampton, 98-0331, p. 18 (La.4/23/99), .
State v. Gayden 133 So. 3d 173 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
art. 703(D); State v. Hunt, 09-1589, p. 7 (La.12/1/09), .
State v. Cole 131 So. 3d 931 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
“When an officer observes what he objectively believes is a traffic offense, the decision to stop the vehicle is reasonable, regardless of the officer’s subjective motivation.” State v. Hunt, 09-1589 (La.12/1/09), .
State v. Evans 130 So. 3d 406 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
State v. Hunt, 2009-1589 (La.12/1/09), ; State v. Gomez, 2006-417 (La.App.
State v. Lewis 126 So. 3d 652 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Hunt, 2009-1589, p. 6 (La.12/1/09), ; State v. Hampton, 98-0331, p. 18 (La.4/23/99), .
State v. Barabin 124 So. 3d 1121 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Hunt, 2009-1589, p. 6 (La.12/1/09), .
State ex rel. D.F. 122 So. 3d 1193 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Hunt, 2009-1589, p. 7 (La.12/1/09), .
State v. Lockett 120 So. 3d 886 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Hunt, 09-1589, p. 6 (La.12/1/09), (citing State v. Hampton, 98-0331, p. 18 (La.4/23/99), ).
State v. Caliste 131 So. 3d 902 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Hunt, *906 09-1589, p. 6 (La.12/1/09), (citation omitted).
State v. Wilson 119 So. 3d 843 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Hunt, 09-1589, p. 6 (La.12/1/09), (citation omitted).
State v. Turner 118 So. 3d 1186 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
“When an officer observes what he objectively believes is a traffic offense, the decision to stop the vehicle is reasonable, | .¡.regardless of the officer’s subjective motivation.” State v. Hunt, 09-1589 (La.12/1/09); .
State v. Bentley 116 So. 3d 891 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
See, State v. Hunt, 09-1589, p. 6 (La.12/1/09), .
State v. Cureaux 116 So. 3d 833 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Hunt, 2009-1589, p. 4 (La.12/1/09), ; State v. Hampton, 98-0331, p. 18 (La.4/23/99), .