Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Hunt, 25 So. 3d 746.

129 citing documents.

State v. Welch 115 So. 3d 490 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
See State v. Hunt, 2009-1589 (La.12/1/09), .
State v. Magee 110 So. 3d 680 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Hunt, 2009-1589, p. 6 (La.12/1/09), ; State v. Hampton, 98-0331, p. 18 (La.4/23/99), .
State v. McNair 107 So. 3d 806 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State v. Hunt, 09-1589, p. 6 (La.12/1/09), , citing State v. Hampton, 98-0331, p. 18 (La.4/23/99), .
State v. Dunham 111 So. 3d 1095 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
See State v. Hunt, 2009-1589 (La.12/1/09), .
State v. Kinard 105 So. 3d 974 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
“When an officer observes what he objectively believes is a traffic offense, the decision to stop the vehicle is reasonable, regardless of the officer’s subjective motivation.” State v. Hunt, 09-1589 (La.12/1/09), .
State v. Thomas 111 So. 3d 386 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
See State v. Hunt, 09-1589 (La.12/1/09), .
State v. Letell 103 So. 3d 1129 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
See State v. Hunt, 2009-1589 (La.12/1/09), .
State of Louisiana v. Marqule Craft La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
State v. Craft 99 So. 3d 1108 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State v. Hunt, 09-1589, pp. 11-12 (La.12/1/09), -55 .
State v. Gray 101 So. 3d 515 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State v. Hunt, 2009-1589, p. 6 (La.12/1/09), ; State v. Hampton, 98-0331 (La.4/23/99), .
State v. Waldrop 93 So. 3d 780 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
See State v. Hunt, 2009-1589 (La.12/1/09), .
State v. Thompson 93 So. 3d 553 La. 2012
“When a trial court makes findings of fact based on the weight of the testimony and the credibility of the witnesses, a reviewing court owes those findings great deference, and may not overturn those findings unless there is no |14evidence to support those findings.” Wells , 2008-2262, p. 4; 45 So.3d at 580 ; State v. Hunt, 2009-1589, p. 6 (La.12/1/09); .
State ex rel. S.L. 94 So. 3d 822 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State v. Hunt, 09-1589 (La.12/1/09), n. 2 .
State v. Smith 90 So. 3d 1114 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State v. Molette 79 So. 3d 484 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
See, State v. Hunt, 09-1589, p. 10 (La.12/1/09), .
State v. Harris 79 So. 3d 1037 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
See State v. Hunt, 2009-1589 (La.12/1/09), .
State v. Mulder 76 So. 3d 1241 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Hunt, 2009-1589, p. 7 (La.12/1/2009), .
State v. Williams 74 So. 3d 1208 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Hunt, 09-1589 (La.12/1/09), ; State v. Hampton, 98-0331 (La.4/23/99), .
State v. Wesley 77 So. 3d 55 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
See State v. Hunt, 09-1589, p. 6 (La.12/1/09), .
State v. Sander 69 So. 3d 730 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Hunt, 09-1589, p. 6 12(La.12/1/09), ; State v. Hampton, 98-0331, p. 18 (La.4/23/99), .
State v. Friday 73 So. 3d 913 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
See State v. Hunt, 2009-1589, p. 6 (La.12/1/09), .
State v. Sparks 68 So. 3d 435 La. 2011
State v. Hunt, 09-1589, p. 11 (12/1/09), ; Cousan , 94-2508, p. 5, 684 So.2d at 386 .
State v. Kimble 62 So. 3d 782 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
See State v. Hunt, 2009-1589, p. 6 (La.12/1/09), .
State v. Spells 56 So. 3d 1073 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
La.C.Cr.P art. 703 D; State v. Hunt, 09-1589, pp. 6-7 (La.12/1/09), ; see also State v. Jason, 10-0658, pp. 2-3 (La.App.
State v. Handy 52 So. 3d 1012 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
“A trial court’s decision relative to the suppression of evidence is afforded great weight and will not be set aside unless there is an abuse of that discretion.” State v. Hunt, 09-1589, p. 7 (La.12/1/09), (citing State v. Lee, 05-2098 (La.1/16/08), , cert.
State v. Sinclair 55 So. 3d 47 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
State v. Johnson 52 So. 3d 110 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
State v. Hunt, 09-1589 (La.12/01/09), .
State v. Wells 45 So. 3d 577 La. 2010
State v. Hunt, 09-1589, p. 6 (La.12/1/09), , citing State v. Hampton, 98-0331, p. 18 (La.4/23/99), .
Foshee v. Georgia Gulf Chemicals & Vinyls, L.L.C. 42 So. 3d 346 La. 2010
State v. Hunt, 09-1589 (La.12/1/09) .