Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Wegener v. Lafayette Insurance Co., 60 So. 3d 1220.

42 citing documents.

St. Charles Surgical Hospital, L.L.C. v. Louisiana Health Service & Indemnity D/B/A Blue Cross Blue Shield of Louisiana, … La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2026
3/15/11), -34 (recognizing that a “de novo review is not the best course of action in every case” and citing Ragas v. Argonaut Southwest Ins.
Gibsland Bank and Trust Company v. The Security Guarantee Corporation of Baltimore La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2026
3/15/11), PVCA Inc. v. Pacific W. TD Fund LP, 21-0753 (La.
Hero Lands Company, L.L.C. v. Chevron U.S.A. Inc.; Total Petrochemicals & Refining USA, Inc.; Pioneer Natural Resources, Inc.; … La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2023
State of Louisiana Versus Malcolm J. Alexander La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2023
Jose Rodriguez-Zaldivar and Dylcio Rodriguez Cruz v. Charles Leggett and Progressive Casualty Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2022
Stephen Michael Brightbill (Deceased) Versus Circuit Grand Bayou, L.L.C. La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2022
Explained Kimberly Brooke Labauve, Et Al. v. Louisiana La. 2022
3/15/11), –34: The authority for an appellate court to remand a case to the trial court for proper consideration, where it is necessary to reach a just decision and to prevent a miscarriage of justice, is conferred by La.
Isabella Criswell v. Collette Kelley, City of Shreveport d/b/a Shreveport Police Department, and American Alternative Insurance Corporation La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2022
3/15/11), Shephard v. AIX Energy Inc., 51,965 (La.
Margie Hendricks and Myrtis Hendricks Williams v. Wells Fargo Insurance, Stericycle, Inc., Shadrack Long, Ortegas Coleman and Ean … La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2022
Susan Pollard Versus 21st Century Insurance Company A/K/A Farmers Insurance Group and Roy Cefalu La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2021
Julio Laboriel-Pitio and Franklin Gustavo Arriola v. Latoya Latiker, Progressive Paloverde Insurance Company and State Farm Mutual Automobile … La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2021
3/15/11), -34.4 “Whether a particular case should be remanded is a matter which is vested largely within the court’s discretion and depends upon the circumstances of the case.” Id., 10-0810, p. 20, 60 So.3d at 1234 (citation omitted).
Mohab Said v. Federated Rural Electric Insurance Exchange, Et Al. La. 2021
3/15/11), See also Herbert v. Travelers Indem.
Cox, Cox, Filo, Camel & Wilson, LLP v. Louisiana Worker's Comp. Corp. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2021
Mathes Brierre Architects, a Professional Corporation v. karlton/isg Enterprises, LLC, International Sales Group, LLC, and J.S. Karlton Company, … La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2020
3/15/11), -34, the Supreme Court explained: Typically where such legal errors have interdicted the fact finding process, if the record is otherwise complete, the appellate court should make its own independent de novo review of the record.
Andrea Lovecchio v. Renee Angelle Romain and Todd Rosenthal La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2020
Justin Dewane Pelle v. Eric Munos and GEICO Casualty Co. La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2020
Beverly Smith v. Citadel Insurance Company as Successor to Gramercy Insurance Company and Goauto Insurance Company La. 2019
Nola E., LLC v. Sims 265 So. 3d 1147 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
Hannah Leblanc v. Cody Welch La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
Leblanc v. Welch 240 So. 3d 291 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
Martinez v. Rames 224 So. 3d 467 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
Jeff Mercer, LLC v. State ex rel. Department of Transportation & Development 222 So. 3d 1017 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
03/15/11), ; Luquette v. Allstate Insurance Indem.
Vince v. Koontz 213 So. 3d 448 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
3/15/11), , 1230 n.10, .
Orozco v. Aries Building Systems, Inc. 202 So. 3d 1018 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
3/15/11), ,1233-34: Typically where such legal errors have interdicted the fact finding process, if the record is otherwise complete, the appellate court should make its own independent de novo review of the record.
Johno v. Doe 187 So. 3d 581 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
Co., 10-0810, p. 12 (La.3/15/11), ; Durio v. Horace Mann Ins.
Justin Hodges v. Amy Hodges 181 So. 3d 700 La. 2015
Co., 10-0810, 10-0811, p. 19 (La.3/15/11), .
Oddo v. Asbestos Corp. 173 So. 3d 1192 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Co., 2010-0810, p. 22 (La.3/15/11), .
Wayne D. Lagrappe v. Progressive Security Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
LaGrappe v. Progressive Security Insurance Co. 154 So. 3d 1263 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Co., 10-0810, 10-811 (La.3/15/11), .
Thomas v. Bridges 144 So. 3d 1001 La. 2014
Co., 10-0810, p. 19 (La.3/15/11), ; Ferrell v. Fireman’s Fund Ins.
Rhodes v. Schultis 140 So. 3d 331 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Co., 10-810 (La.3/15/11); .
Gorman v. Miller 136 So. 3d 834 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Co., 10-0810 (La.3/15/11), ; Alex v. Rayne Concrete Service, 05-1457 (La.1/26/07), .
Marcus Broussard, Jr. v. Martin Operating Partnership La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
Broussard v. Martin Operating Partnership 103 So. 3d 713 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Willis v. Noble Drilling (US), Inc. 105 So. 3d 828 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Co., 2010-0810, p. 8 (La.3/15/11), .
Bourque v. Essex Insurance Co. 90 So. 3d 1031 La. 2012
Co., 10-0810, p. 14, n. 10 (La.3/15/11), (finding jury interrogatories misstated the law, and thus constituted plain and fundamental error).
Caskey v. Merrick Construction Co. 86 So. 3d 186 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
See also, Wegener v. Lafayette Insurance Co., 10-0810, 10-0811 (La.03/15/11), ; Lastrapes v. Progressive Security Insur *196 ance Co., 10-0051 (La.11/30/10), .
Clarence M. Leland, Et Ux. v. Lafayette Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
Leland v. Lafayette Insurance Co. 77 So. 3d 1078 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
Co., 10-810 (La.3/15/11), .
Durio v. Horace Mann Insurance Co. 74 So. 3d 1159 La. 2011
4 Cir. 3/10/10) , , judgment vacated, 2010-0810 (La.3/15/11) , 8 and Buffman, Inc. v. Lafayette Ins.
Carl R. Guidry, Et Ux. v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
3/15/11), a Katrina wind-and-flood-damage case, the Louisiana Supreme Court reiterated its finding under Sultana, and again quoted with approval the reasoning and language set forth by this court in Midland, that penalties may be imposed under La.R.S.
Guidry v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. 74 So. 3d 1276 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
More recently, in Wegener v. Lafayette Insurance Co., 10-810 (La.3/15/11), , a Katrina wind-and-flood-damage case, the Louisiana Supreme Court reiterated its finding under Sultana, and again quoted with approval the reasoning and language set forth by this court in Midland, that penalties may be imposed under La.R.S.