Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Jones, 74 So. 3d 197.

25 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Gerald Manchip White La. 2025
State of Louisiana v. Jimmie Dixon, Jr. La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2025
9/7/11), (quoting State v. Interiano, 2003-1760 (La.
State of Louisiana v. David Junior Patton La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2025
9/7/11), the supreme court noted that it had earlier defined “lewd and lascivious” in the context of La.
State Of Louisiana v. Daniel Lee Wiggins La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2025
State Of Louisiana v. William Eugene Naulty La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2025
State of Louisiana v. Keith Brown, II La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2024
9/7/11), the supreme court noted that it had earlier defined “lewd and lascivious” in the context of La.
State Of Louisiana v. Christopher Paul Glenn La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2022
State Of Louisiana v. Celito C. Jackson La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2020
State of Louisiana v. Manuel Dukes La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2019
State v. Bridges 251 So. 3d 661 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2018
State of Louisiana v. David Billy Parker, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
State v. Parker 245 So. 3d 1066 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
State of Louisiana v. Teddy Aguillard La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
9/7/11), explained that by enacting Section (A)(2), the “legislature has expressed its intent to punish conduct that involves no more than a communication.” When Jones committed his crimes in 2007, Section (A)(2) (emphasis added) made “it a crime to electronically transmit a lewd or lascivious message to a perso
State v. Aguillard 242 So. 3d 765 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
9/7/11), , 203, explained that by enacting Section (A)(2), the "legislature has expressed its intent to punish conduct that involves no more than a communication."
State of Louisiana v. Timothy Eugene Dowden, Sr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
9/7/11), the court explained in pertinent part: [I]n order to have convicted Defendant of the lesser and included offense of attempted indecent behavior with a juvenile, the jury would have had to find that the Defendant specifically intended to commit a lewd and lascivious act upon the victim, o
State v. Dowden 224 So. 3d 1061 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
9/7/11), , the court explained in pertinent part: [ I ]n order to have convicted Defendant of the lesser and included offense of attempted indecent behavior with a juvenile, the jury would have had to find that the Defendant specifically intended to commit a lewd and lascivious act upon the victim, or in the victim’s presence
State v. Hicks 222 So. 3d 91 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
State v. McKinney 194 So. 3d 699 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
The Louisiana Supreme Court has defined “lewd and lascivious conduct” very broadly as any conduct which is “lustful, obscene, indecent, tending to deprave the morals in respect to sexual relations, and relating to the sexual impurity or incontinence carried on in a wanton manner.” See State v. Jones, 10-0762 (La.9/7/11), .
State v. Graham 148 So. 3d 601 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
See State v. Jones, 10-0762, p. 4 n. 1 (La.9/7/11), , 200 n. 1.
State v. Hatfield 155 So. 3d 572 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
"Specific intent may be inferred from the circumstances surrounding the offense and the conduct of the defendant.” State v. Jones, 2010-0762, pp. 5-6 (La.9/7/11), .
State of Louisiana v. Tony Garnell Pennywell La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
State v. Pennywell 139 So. 3d 587 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
“Specific intent may be inferred from the circumstances surrounding the offense and the conduct of the defendant.” State v. Jones, 10-762, p. 6 (La.9/7/11), .
State v. Williams 103 So. 3d 558 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
State v. Jones, 2010-0762 (La.9/7/11), ; Prine, supra.
State v. Brown 92 So. 3d 579 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
State v. Jones, 2010-0762 (La.9/7/11), ; Prine, supra.
State v. Foster 92 So. 3d 468 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
State v. Jones, 2010-0762 (La.9/7/11), .

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by