Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite MB Industries, LLC v. CNA Insurance Co., 74 So. 3d 1173.

54 citing documents.

Gibsland Bank and Trust Company v. The Security Guarantee Corporation of Baltimore La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2026
10/25/11), and submits that Security simply failed to meet this burden: Security is suggesting GBT could have used R.S.
Shanell Mary Lavigne v. Veronica "Vicky" Jones d/b/a Veronica "Vicky" Jones, Attorney at Law, LLC and XYZ Insurance … La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2024
10/ 25/ 11), N Our Supreme Court has held that expert testimony must be introduced in legal malpractice cases to establish the applicable standard of care, except in those rare cases where the malpractice is so egregious that the trier of fact could infer the defendant' s actions fell below any reasonable st
Police Jury of Calcasieu Parish v. Indian Harbor Insurance Co. La. 2024
10/25/11), (citations omitted).
Jrb Holdings, L.L.C. and/or Jrb Holdings, L.L.C. in Its Representative Capacity for Mst, L.L.C., and/or John Ray Broussard … La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
Guilbeau Marine, Inc., Formosa Plantation, LLC, Anthony Guilbeau, Jr. and Lorraine G. Guilbeau v. George J. Ledet, Jr. … La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2023
Kayla M. Neville Versus John W. Redmann, Law Office of John W. Redmann, LLC, and Xyz Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2022
10/25/11), in which the Louisiana Supreme Court held that it is not enough to simply show that the defendant attorney acted negligently, but the plaintiff must also introduce evidence that the negligence caused plaintiff’s loss.
Freddy L. Wilson, Branson Wilson, and Antonia Burks v. GEICO Casualty Company, Courtesy Chevrolet, Inc. d/b/a Chevyland, and … La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2022
10/25/11), Putman v. Costello, 53,142 (La.
Troy Henry v. Janet M. Ahern & Janet M. Ahern, Plc La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2022
10/25/11), (citations omitted).
Robert Schiff v. Lawrence G. Pugh, III, Frederick T. Haas, III, Alexander L. Burns, and Pugh, Accardo, Haas, … La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2021
10/25/11), the Supreme Court confirmed that Jenkins had eliminated the “case within a case” requirement but it also made clear that “causation is an essential element of any tort claim” and that “[a]t the very least, [plaintiff] must establish some causal connection between the alleged negligence and the eventual unfa
Kristin Pearce v. Ross Forrest Lagarde, Jones Lagarde, LLC, and ABC Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2021
Shantel Delco v. State Farm Mutual Auto. Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2021
LARRY BIZE, SR. AND v. VERSUS La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2021
Michael Belanger v. Spencer H. Calahan, LLC, Spencer Calahan, Jonathan D. Mayeaux, Brady Patin, and ABC Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2021
10/ 25/ 11), Teague v. St.
Ela Ine Ewing Vs. La. 2020
10/25/11), we confirmed the holding in Jenkins, explaining it is not sufficient for the plaintiff to simply show the attorney acted negligently, and making clear the plaintiff continues to bear the initial burden of establishing some causal connection between the negligence and the alleged loss: Although this Court
Robert E. Redstone, III v. John P. Sipes La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2020
10/25/11), Akers v. Bernhard Mech.
Larry Bize, Sr. and Michelle R. Bize v. Malcolm Larvadain La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
10/25/11), ).12 The panel explained that: Regarding the showing of necessity for posting bond, the supreme court in Carter agreed that it was “within the discretion of the trial judge to determine whether the showing required may be made by the allegations in the motion, supporting affidavits
Bize v. Larvadain 263 So. 3d 584 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
Howell Constr., Inc. v. Andry Lerner, L.L.C. 258 So. 3d 125 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
Hoffman v. Theriot 249 So. 3d 297 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
10/25/11), , 1184-85 and cases cited therein.
Black Water Marsh, LLC v. Roger C. Ferriss Properties, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
Henry v. Weishaupt 221 So. 3d 299 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
Aleashia Clarkston v. Ike Funderburk La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
10/25/11), which states: In order to establish a valid legal malpractice claim, MBI must show evidence sufficient to convince a reasonable trier of fact of (1) the existence of an attorney- client relationship; (2) negligent representation by the
Clarkston v. Funderburk 211 So. 3d 509 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
10/25/11), , which states: In order to establish a valid legal malpractice claim, MBI must show evidence sufficient to convince a reasonable trier of fact of (1) the existence of an attorney-client relationship; (2) negligent representation by the attorney; and (3) loss caused by that negligence.
Hamilton v. Burns 202 So. 3d 1177 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
Watson v. Franklin 198 So. 3d 177 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
Co., 2011-0303 (La.10/25/11), .
Brennan's Inc. v. Colbert 191 So. 3d 1101 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
Co., 11-0303, p. 15 (La.10/25/11), .
Lewis v. Young 187 So. 3d 531 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
First, it fails to show that the settlement award was an “unfavorable outcome.” See MB Industries, LLC v. CNA Ins, Co., 11-0303, p. 20 (La.10/25/11), .
Timothy M. Van Mol, Et Ux. v. Ken Beasley La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
Van Mol v. Beasley 184 So. 3d 280 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
Co., 11-303, p. 10 (La.10/25/11), .
Hardison v. Byrne 182 So. 3d 1110 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Co., 2011-0303; 0304, p. 20 (La.10/25/11), .
Jones v. American Alternative Insurance Corp. 169 So. 3d 386 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
MB Industries, LLC v. CNA Insurance Company, 11-0303, p. 15 (La.10/25/11), .
Roy Bufkin, Jr. v. Felipe's Louisiana, LLC 171 So. 3d 851 La. 2014
See also MB Industries, LLC v. CNA Insurance Company, 11-0303 (La.10/25/11), ("Once the defendant's motion is filed, the plaintiff must present sufficient factual support to prove every essential element of his claim....
Akers v. Bernhard Mechanical Contractors, Inc. 137 So. 3d 818 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
Co., 2011-0303 (La.10/25/11), ; Greenhead Gun Club v. City of Shreveport, 40,045 (La.App.
LeGardeur v. Coleman 131 So. 3d 1035 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Co., 11-0303 (La.10/25/11), (quoting Morris v. Friedman, 94-2808 (La.11/27/95), ).
Jones v. ABC Insurance 130 So. 3d 35 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Co., 11-0303 (La.10/25/11), .
Maw Enterprises, L.L.C. v. City of Marksville La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
MAW Enterprises L.L.C. v. City of Marksville 128 So. 3d 575 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Co., 11-303, 11-304 (La.10/25/11), .
Ciolino v. First Guaranty Bank 133 So. 3d 686 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Saussy v. Bonin 125 So. 3d 1 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2013
Co., 11-0303; 0304, p. 10 (La.10/25/11), .
Raymond Charles, Sr. v. Towing and Recovery Professionals of Louisiana Trust La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
Charles v. Towing & Recovery Professionals of Louisiana, Inc. 156 So. 3d 84 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Co., 11-303, 11-304 (La.10/25/11), .
Rondeno v. Law Office of William S. Vincent 111 So. 3d 515 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2013
Co., 11-0303, p. 15 (La.10/25/11), .
Sanchez v. Dubuc 110 So. 3d 1140 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Co., 2011-0303 (La.10/25/11); .
Waste Management of Louisiana, LLC v. Penn-America Insurance Co. 110 So. 3d 200 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Relying heavily upon our supreme court’s holding in MB Industries, LLC v. CNA Insurance Co., 11-303, 11-304 (La.10/25/11), , Waste Management argues that “[w]hen the test and factors set out in MB Industries are applied to the facts of this case, it is clear that the trial court made a patently erroneous decision in applying equitable estoppel.” In MB Industries, , the defendants urged that the doctrine of equitable estoppel
Waste Management of Louisiana, LLC v. Penn-America Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
10/25/11), Waste Management argues that ―[w]hen the test and factors set out in MB Industries are applied to the facts of this case, it is clear that the trial court made a patently erroneous decision in applying equitable estoppel.‖ In MB Industries, the defendants urged that the doctrine of equitable
Luther v. IOM Co. 109 So. 3d 467 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
MB Industries, LLC v. CNA Insurance Company, 2011-0303 (La.10/25/ll), ; Blanchard v. ABC Insurance Company, 38,005 (La.App.2d Cir.3/3/04), , writ denied, 2004-1101 (La.9/3/04), .
Bcm, L.L.C. v. Roy Clifton Cheatwood La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
10/25/11), (quoting Ramp v. St.
Brassette v. Exnicios 92 So. 3d 1077 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
MB Industries, LLC v. CNA Insurance Company, 2011-0303 (La.10/25/11), .
Crescent City Property Redevelopment Ass'n v. Hardy 89 So. 3d 1270 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2012
Co., 2011-0303, p. 15 (La.10/25/11), (Citations omitted).
Criticized Gorbach v. Tulane University Medical Center 89 So. 3d 429 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Co., 2011-0303, 2011-0304, pp. 15-16 (La.10/25/11), , provides guidance on this issue: There is no requirement for the defendant to wait until all discovery deadlines have passed before filing a motion for summary judgment, and a defendant’s motion for summary judgment “may be made at any time.” La.Code of Civ.

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by