DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Jones, 76 So. 3d 608.

13 citing documents.

  • State of Louisiana v. Charles Penn La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2026
    App. 4 Cir. 10/19/11), ).
  • State of Louisiana v. Kenneth Collins La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2025
  • State of Louisiana v. April Butler La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2024
    App. 4 Cir. 10/19/11), ).
  • State v. McBride 239 So. 3d 383 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
    App. 4 Cir. 10/19/11), , 611 ( citing State v. Juluke , 98-341 (La.
  • State v. Jones 165 So. 3d 217 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
  • State of Louisiana v. Kenneth Wayne Montgomery La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
    4 Cir. 10/19/11), writ denied, 11-2545 (La.3/30/12)
  • State of Louisiana v. Alex Sigue La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
    4 Cir. 10/19/11), writ denied, 11-2545 (La.
  • State v. Sigue 134 So. 3d 156 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    4 Cir. 10/19/11) , , writ denied, 11-2545 (La.3/30/12), .
  • State v. Common 132 So. 3d 1282 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2014
    4 Cir. 10/19/11) ; , writ denied, 11-2545 (La.3/30/12); .
  • State v. Veal 116 So. 3d 779 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    4 Cir. 10/19/11), , 611 4 : “In the absence of *791 internal contradiction or irreconcilable conflict with the physical evidence, one witness’s testimony, if believed by the trier of fact, is sufficient to support a factual conclusion.
  • State v. Brown 157 So. 3d 616 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    4 Cir. 10/19/11) , , writ denied, 11-2545 (La.3/30/12), , the defendant, who was convicted of | ^possession of heroin, but had two other pending felony charges, was sentenced to seven years.
  • State v. Guity 97 So. 3d 1113 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    4 Cir. 10/19/11), : “In the absence of internal contradiction or irreconcilable conflict with the physical evidence, one witness’s testimony, if believed by the trier of fact, is sufficient to support a factual conclusion.
  • State v. Williams 85 So. 3d 759 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    4 Cir. 10/19/11), : “In the absence of internal contradiction or irreconcilable conflict with the physical evidence, one witness’s testimony, if believed by the trier of fact, is sufficient to support a factual conclusion.