Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Hayes Fund for the First United Methodist Church of Welsh, LLC v. Kerr-Mcgee Rocky Mounta…, 193 So. 3d 1110.

116 citing documents.

Frank Vine v. Teachers Retirement System of Louisiana La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
Treva A. Ory v. Lee M. Russell, Amanda N. Russell and Versatile Fab, Inc. La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
Florida Gas Transmission Company, LLC v. Texas Brine Company, LLC La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
Smith v. City of Monroe 267 So. 3d 1218 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2019
12/8/15), ; Succession of Houston , 52,181 (La.
Koertge v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Insurance Company 266 So. 3d 441 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2019
12/8/15), ; Baw v. Paulson , 50,707 (La.
Aaron v. Exxon Mobil Corp. 271 So. 3d 205 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
Stevens v. St. Tammany Parish Gov't 264 So. 3d 456 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
Lafayette General Medical Center,inc. v. Richard Hill La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
12/8/15), - 16, the supreme court reiterated the duty of appellate courts in a manifest error review and stated in pertinent part: In all civil cases, the appropriate standard for appellate review of factual determinations is the manifest error-clearly wrong standard, which precludes the setting
Naramore v. Aikman 252 So. 3d 935 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
Turner v. E. Baton Rouge Parish Sch. Bd. 252 So. 3d 990 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
In re Lanier 249 So. 3d 1059 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
Succession of Eugene D. Lanier La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
Shephard v. AIX Energy, Inc. 249 So. 3d 194 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2018
12/8/15), , and citations therein.
Michael Albarado, Individually v. Citgo Petroleum Corporation La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
12/8/15), - 16, the supreme court reiterated the duty of appellate courts in a manifest error review and stated in pertinent part: In all civil cases, the appropriate standard for appellate review of factual determinations is the manifest error-clearly wrong standard, which precludes the setting
Albarado v. Citgo Petroleum Corp. 247 So. 3d 818 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
12/8/15), , 1115-16, the supreme court reiterated the duty of appellate courts in a manifest error review and stated in pertinent part: In all civil cases, the appropriate standard for appellate review of factual determinations is the manifest error-clearly wrong standard, which precludes the setting aside of a trial court's fi
Jacqueline J. Gaspard v. Horace Mann Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
On review, an appellate court “must be cautious not to re-weigh the evidence or to substitute its own factual findings just because it would have decided the case differently.” Hayes Fund for First United Methodist Church of Welsh, LLC v. Kerr-McGee Rocky Mountain, LLC, 14-2592, p. 9 (La.12/8/15)
Gaspard v. Horace Mann Ins. Co. 247 So. 3d 778 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
In re Dean 247 So. 3d 746 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
Gaines v. Laura Wilson, State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. 240 So. 3d 1010 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
12/8/15), , 1116 (citing Menard , supra ) (noting that "an appellate court on review must be cautious not to re-weigh the evidence or to substitute its own factual findings just because it would have decided the case differently"); Purvis v. Grant Par.
Roper v. City of Baton Rouge 244 So. 3d 450 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
William Terry Ebarb and Dewanna N. Ebarb v. Unopened Succ. of Alfair Jones Sepulvado La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
12/8/15), - 16, wherein the court stated: In all civil cases, the appropriate standard for appellate review of factual determinations is the manifest error-clearly wrong standard, which precludes the setting aside of a trial court’s finding of fact unless that finding is clearly wrong in l
Norman Michael Sepulvado v. William Terry Ebarb La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
12/8/15), - 16, wherein the court stated: In all civil cases, the appropriate standard for appellate review of factual determinations is the manifest error-clearly wrong standard, which precludes the setting aside of a trial court’s finding of fact unless that finding is clearly wrong in l
Ebarb v. Unopened Succession Sepulvado 241 So. 3d 1103 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
12/8/15), , 1115-16, wherein the court stated: In all civil cases, the appropriate standard for appellate review of factual determinations is the manifest error-clearly wrong standard, which precludes the setting aside of a trial court's finding of fact unless that finding is clearly wrong in light of the record reviewed in its
Covington Golf & Recreation Park, Inc. v. Keating 244 So. 3d 14 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
Pamelia Elmer Villa, Individually & O/B/O the Minor Child v. Geico Casualty Insurance Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
Villa v. Geico Cas. Ins. Co. 239 So. 3d 346 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
Hurst v. Cirrus Allied & Ky. Ins. Guaranty Ass'n 241 So. 3d 1177 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
Marguerite Fugler Cardwell v. Oaks Care Center, LLC La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
Cardwell v. Oaks Care Ctr., LLC 258 So. 3d 720 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
429 Bourbon Street, LLC v. RMDR Investments, Inc. 230 So. 3d 256 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
Savanah Williams v. Vincent Alexander La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
Donald P. Lemoine v. City of Marksville La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
12/8/15), - 16, the supreme court reiterated the duty of appellate courts under a manifest error review and stated in pertinent part: In all civil cases, the appropriate standard for appellate review of factual determinations is the manifest error-clearly wrong standard, which precludes the sett
Jake Chimento v. Kdm Electric of Alexandria La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
12/8/15), - 16, the supreme court reiterated the duty of appellate courts in a manifest error review and stated in pertinent part: In all civil cases, the appropriate standard for appellate review of factual determinations is the manifest error-clearly wrong standard, which precludes the settin
John Kennedy v. Christopher Davis La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
12/8/15), - 16, the supreme court reiterated the duty of appellate courts in a manifest error review and stated in pertinent part: In all civil cases, the appropriate standard for appellate review of factual determinations is the manifest error-clearly wrong standard, which precludes the setting
Chimento v. KDM Electric of Alexandria 229 So. 3d 54 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
12/8/15), -16 , the supreme court reiterated the duty of appellate courts in a manifest error review and stated in pertinent part: In all civil cases, the appropriate standard for appellate review of factual determinations is the manifest error-clearly wrong standard, which precludes the setting aside of a trial court’s fi
Kennedy v. Davis 229 So. 3d 558 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
12/8/15), -16 , the supreme court reiterated the duty of appellate courts in a manifest error review and stated in pertinent part: In all civil.cases, the appropriate standard for appellate review of factual determinations is the manifest error-clearly wrong standard, which precludes the setting aside of a trial court’s fi
Bradley v. St. Francis Med. Ctr. 244 So. 3d 722 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
12/08/15), , 1116 ; Henderson, supra .
Bosley v. Oliphint Enters., LLC 244 So. 3d 692 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
12/8/15), , and citations therein .
Stipp v. MetLife Auto & Home Insurance Agency, Inc. 225 So. 3d 1182 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
12/8/15), ; Mouton v. Generac Power Sys., 14-350 (La.
Bradix v. Advance Stores Co. 226 So. 3d 523 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
Jimmy Williams, Sr. v. Placid Oil Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
James Robinson v. the Board of Supervisors for the University of Louisiana System and Joey Sturm, Individually and … 225 So. 3d 424 La. 2017
Marie v. Allstate Insurance Co. 224 So. 3d 372 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
Gloria's Ranch, L.L.C. v. Tauren Exploration, Inc. 223 So. 3d 1202 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
12/08/15), , the Supreme Court reaffirmed the manifest error standard of review, and articulated the duty of appellate courts when reviewing a trial court’s factual finding.
Vernon A. Valentino, M.D. v. Heart and Vascular Associates of Acadiana, P.C. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
12/8/15), - 16, the supreme court reiterated the duty of appellate courts in a manifest error review and stated in pertinent part: In all civil cases, the appropriate standard for appellate review 6 of factual determinations is the manifest error-clearly w
Valentino v. Heart & Vascular Associates of Acadiana, P.C. 221 So. 3d 136 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
12/8/15), -16 , the supreme court reiterated the duty of appellate courts in a manifest error review and stated in pertinent part: In all civil cases, the appropriate standard for appellate review 17of factual determinations is the manifest error-clearly wrong standard, which precludes the setting aside of a trial court’s
Bouchon v. Walkenford 218 So. 3d 1100 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
12/8/15), ; see also Hall v. Folger Coffee Company, 03-1734 (La.
Thomas J. Bell, Sr. v. the City of Lake Charles La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
12/8/15), -1117, the supreme court recently reiterated the well-known appellate standard of review: In all civil cases, the appropriate standard for appellate review of factual determinations is the manifest error-clearly wrong standard, .
Bell v. City of Lake Charles 218 So. 3d 190 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
12/8/15), -1117 , the supreme court recently reiterated the well-known appellate standard of review: In all civil cases, the appropriate standard for appellate review of factual determinations is the manifest- error-clearly wrong standard, which precludes the setting -aside of a trial court’s finding of fact- unless that f
Melvin R. Lucas, Jr., Et Ux. v. Rapides Healthcare System, L.L.C. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
12/08/15), -16, the supreme court reiterated the duty of appellate courts in a manifest error review and stated in pertinent part: In all civil cases, the appropriate standard for appellate review of factual determinations is the manifest error-clearly wrong standard, which precludes the setti