Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State of Louisiana v. Corei K. Guidry, 221 So. 3d 815.

14 citing documents.

State of Louisiana Versus Marvin K Chest La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2025
3/15/17), the Louisiana Supreme Court examined the jurisprudence regarding informing a jury of a sentence.
State of Louisiana v. Jkari Campbell La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2025
3/15/17), to support his claim that the jury being informed of his parole eligibility was improper.
State of Louisiana v. Calvin Horton La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2020
3/15/17), He argues that his sentence constitutes a gross misuse of the habitual offender law in a way that violates constitutional prerogatives.
La. 2020
3/15/17), (Crichton, J., additionally concurring) (“[T]he abusive frequency with which a de minimis number of jurisdictions invoke habitual offender laws against non- violent actors appears to do little to protect the people of Louisiana, and depletes the already scarce fiscal resources of this state.”); State v. Hickm
State of Louisiana v. Louie Von Cole La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
State v. Smith 275 So. 3d 266 La. 2019
3/15/17), , 830 (Crichton, J. concurring) ("The Louisiana Constitution imbues the legislature with the sole authority to define conduct as criminal and provide penalties for such conduct.
State v. Guidry 257 So. 3d 174 La. 2018
3/15/17), , 831 (Crichton, J., additionally concurring); State v. Hickman , 2017-0142 (La.
State v. Dorsey 260 So. 3d 616 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
3/15/17), , 831 : Thus, if a defendant believes that the state has abused its professional discretion in filing a habitual offender bill such that it seeks to impose an unconstitutionally excessive sentence, the defendant should move the court at the sentencing hearing to depart downward from the mandatory minimum as permitted
State of Louisiana v. Adrian A. Dorsey A/K/A Adrian Anton Dorsey La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
3/15/17), : Thus, if a defendant believes that the state has abused its professional discretion in filing a habitual offender bill such that it seeks to impose an unconstitutionally excessive sentence, the defendant should move the court at the sentencing hearing to
State v. Ellison 255 So. 3d 568 La. 2018
3/15/17), , 826-27 (J, dissenting).
State v. Dickerson 251 So. 3d 1062 La. 2018
3/15/17), (...."[T]he abusive frequency with which a de minimis number of jurisdictions invoke habitual offender laws against non-violent actors appears to do little to protect the people of Louisiana, and depletes the already scarce fiscal resources of this state."
State v. Floyd 254 So. 3d 38 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2018
3/15/17), , which opined that the "current jurisprudence subverts the will of the legislature," the "imposition of life sentences on non-violent offenders at a certain point lacks any meaningful social value and may constitute aberrant cruelty," and such sentences are imposed with "abusive frequency."
State v. Lewis 245 So. 3d 363 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2018
State v. Hickman 227 So. 3d 246 La. 2017
3/15/17), (Crichton, J., concurring); State v. Hagans, 2016-0103, p. 1 (La.