State Of Louisiana v. Sidney Kristopher Smith

Supreme Court of Louisiana
November 03, 2021
Chief Deputy Clerk of Court
For the Court
The Supreme Court of the State of Louisiana
STATE OF LOUISIANA
VS.
SIDNEY KRISTOPHER SMITH
No. 2021-KP-00804
_ _
_ _ _ _
I
N RE: Sidney Kristopher Smith - Applicant Defendant; Applying For Supervisory
Writ, Parish of St. Charles, 29th Judicial District Court Number(s) 15,184, Court of
Appeal, Fifth Circuit, Number(s) 21-KH-126;
_ _ _ _ _ _
November 03, 2021
Writ application denied. See per curiam.
JTG
JLW
JDH
SJC
WJC
JBM
PDG
11/03/2021 "See News Release 043 for any Concurrences and/or Dissents."

SUPRE
ME COURT OF LOUISIANA
No.
21-KP-0804
STA
TE OF LOUISIANA
v.
SID
NEY KRISTOPHER SMITH
ON S
UPERVISORY WRITS TO THE TWENTY-NINTH
JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF ST. CHARLES
PER CURI
AM:
De
nied. Applicant fails to show that he received ineffective assistance of
appellate counsel under the standard of Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668,
104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984).
Applicant has now fully litigated his application for post-conviction relief in
state court. Similar to federal habeas relief, see 28 U.S.C. § 2244, Louisiana post-
conviction procedure envisions the filing of a second or successive application
only under the narrow circumstances provided in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4 and within
the limitations period as set out in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Notably, the legislature in
2013 La. Acts 251 amended that article to make the procedural bars against
successive filings mandatory. Applicant’s claims have now been fully litigated in
accord with La.C.Cr.P. art. 9 30.6, and this denial is final. Hereafter, unless he can
show that one of the narrow exceptions authorizing the filing of a successive
application applies, applicant has exhausted his right to state collateral review. The
district court is ordered to record a minute entry consistent with this per curiam.
11/03/21