2023-KH-00799 Precedential Writ application denied. Processed

State Of Louisiana v. Marquise Jamal Jones

Louisiana Supreme Court · Filed November 21, 2023

Authorities cited

Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.

Opinion text

Supreme Court of Louisiana
November 21, 2023
Chief Deputy Clerk of Court
For the Court
The Supreme Court of the State of Louisiana
STATE OF LOUISIANA
VS.
MARQUISE JAMAL JONES
No. 2023-KH-00799
_ _
_ _ _ _
I
N RE: Marquise J. Jones - Applicant Defendant; Applying For Supervisory Writ,
Parish of Caddo, 1st Judicial District Court Number(s) 345,115, Court of Appeal,
Second Circuit, Number(s) 55,246-KH;
_ _ _ _ _ _
November 21, 2023
Writ application denied. See per curiam.
JDH
JLW
SJC
JTG
WJC
JBM
PDG
11/21/2023 "See News Release 051 for any Concurrences and/or Dissents."

SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA
No. 23-KH-0799
STATE OF LOUISIANA
v.
MARQUISE JAMAL JONES
ON SUPERVISORY WRITS TO THE FIRST
JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF CADDO
PER CURIAM:
Denied. Applicant fails to show that he r eceived ineffective assistance of
counsel under the standard of Strickland v. Washington , 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct.
2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984). As to his remaining claim, it is not cognizable on
collateral review. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.3; State ex rel. Melinie v. State, 93-1380 (La.
1/12/96), 665 So.2d 1172. It is also repetitive. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4(A).
Applicant has now fully litigated his application for post -conviction relief in
state court. Similar to federal ha beas relief, see 28 U.S.C. § 2244, Louisia na post-
conviction procedure envisions the filing of a second or successive application
only under the narrow circumstances provided in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4 and within
the limitations period as set out in La.C.Cr. P. art. 930.8. Notably, the legislature in
2013 La. Acts 251 amended that article to make the procedural bars against
successive filings mandatory. Applicant’s claims have now been fully litigated in
accord with La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.6, and this denial is fi nal. Hereafter, unless he can
show that on e of the narrow exceptions authorizing the filing of a successive
application applies, applicant has exhausted his right to state collateral review. The
district court is ordered to record a minute entry consistent with this per curiam.
11/21/2023