State Of Louisiana v. William Michale Hayden
State Of Louisiana v. William Michale Hayden, No. 2023-KH-01363 (La. Feb. 27, 2024).
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- 303 So. 3d 631 not in our corpus
Opinion text
Supreme Court of Louisiana
February 27, 2024
Chief Deputy Clerk of Court
For the Court
The Supreme Court of the State of Louisiana
STATE OF LOUISIANA
VS.
WILLIAM MICHALE HAYDEN
No. 2023-KH-01363
_ _
_ _ _ _
IN
RE: William Michale Hayden - Applicant Defendant; Applying For Supervisory
Writ, Parish of East Baton Rouge, 19th Judicial District Court Number(s) 12-14 -
0657, Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Number(s) 2023 KW 0684;
_ _ _ _ _ _
February 27, 2024
Writ application denied. See per curiam.
PDG
JLW
JDH
SJC
JTG
WJC
JBM
02/27/2024 "See News Release 009 for any Concurrences and/or Dissents."
SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA
No. 23-KH-1363
STATE OF LOUISIANA
v.
WILLIAM MICHALE HAYDEN
ON SUPERVISORY WRITS TO THE NINETEENTH
JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF EAST BATON ROUGE
PER CURIAM:
Denied. Applicant shows no violation of the “fair cross -section
requirement.” See State v. Germany, 20 -0878 (La. 11/4/20), 303 So.3d 631.
Applicant fails to show that he received ineffective assistance of counsel under the
standard of Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d
674 (1984).
Applicant has now fully litigated his application for post -conviction relief in
state court. Similar to federal habeas relief, see 28 U.S.C. § 2244, Louisiana post -
conviction procedure envisions the filing of a second or successive application
only under the narrow circumstances provided in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4 and within
the limitations period as set out in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Notably, the legislature in
2013 La. Acts 251 amended that article to make the procedural ba rs against
successive filings manda tory. Applicant's claims have now been fully litigated in
accord with La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.6, and this denial is final. Hereafter, unless he can
show that one of the narrow exceptions authorizing the filing of a successive
application applies, applicant has exhausted his right to state collateral review. The
district court is ordered to record a minute entry consistent with this per curiam.
02/27/24