Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Siekmann v. Kern, 68 So. 128.

6 citing documents.

Margaret C. Camalo v. Patricia Laura Estrada Courtois La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
1068, (1915), it was held that a judgment which taxed the costs of the proceeding against “the defendants” was sufficient, although the defendants were not actually named in the judgment.
Freeman v. Zara's Food Store, Inc. 204 So. 3d 691 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
1068 , (1915), for the proposition that a judgment expressed for "the plaintiff” will be sufficient, if the names of the parties thus designated can be ascertained from the record.
Donald A. Cross, Et Ux. v. Timber Trails Apartments La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
However, as the Crosses argue, this dicta from the 1968 which held that a judgment expressed to be for “the plaintiff” or against “the defendant” will be sufficient, if the names of the parties thus designated can be ascertained without ambiguity from other parts of the record.
Cross v. Timber Trails Apartments 949 So. 2d 616 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
1068 , (1915), which held that a judgment expressed to be for "the plaintiff" or against "the defendant" will be sufficient, if the names of the parties thus designated can be ascertained without ambiguity from other parts of the record.
Delapasse v. Phillips 348 So. 2d 754 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
Glen Falls Indemnity Co. v. Manning 168 So. 787 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1936
1068 , , it was held that a judgment which taxes the costs of the proceeding against “the defendants” was sufficient, although the defendants were not actually named in the judgment.