21405 Precedential Affirmed Processed

Alice v. Woods

Louisiana Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit · Filed December 5, 1960 · 124 So. 2d 770

Also decided on this docket: La., February 25, 1918 82 So. 841

Cited by

Tickles v. Doty 420 So. 2d 1032 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1982
Cage v. McCraine 239 So. 2d 705 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
Merchants Trust & Savings Bank v. Guthrie 222 So. 2d 658 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
Modern Appliance & Supply, Inc. v. Sapp 200 So. 2d 363 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
Bader Finance Co. v. Asset 169 So. 2d 220 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
Garrison v. Kuntz 166 So. 2d 295 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
Canzoneri v. Connecticut Fire Ins. Co. of Hartford 163 So. 2d 834 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1964
Chapman v. Lalumia 154 So. 2d 93 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
Dorsey v. Corrugated Asbestos Contractors, Inc. 147 So. 2d 233 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1962
F. A. B. Distributing Co. v. Marullo 138 So. 2d 656 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
Dia-Log Co. v. Pareti 126 So. 2d 197 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961

Authorities cited

Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.

Delpit v. Delpit 232 La. 539
Perkins v. Buchler 223 La. 179
Succession of Bailey 232 La. 824
Nagim v. Morrison 95 So. 2d 326

Opinion text

124 So.2d 770 (1960) Assad ALICE v. George O. WOODS. No. 21405. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fourth Circuit. December 5, 1960. George O. Woods, in pro. per. Richard S. McBride, Jr., New Orleans, for plaintiff-appellee. SAMUEL, Judge. The appellant did not make an appearance when this case was regularly called for argument, nor has he filed a brief herein. The appellee alone has appeared and he has submitted the case and moved that the judgment be affirmed. Since the appellant has not pointed out any error in the judgment of the lower court, that judgment may be affirmed under the presumption that it is correct. Delpit v. Delpit, 1957, 232 La. 539 , 94 So.2d 660 ; Perkins et al. v. Buchler et al., 1953, 223 La. 179 , 65 So.2d 130 ; Succession of Bailey, 1957, 232 La. 824 , 95 So.2d 326 . We have examined the record and find no error patent on the face thereof. For the reasons assigned, the judgment appealed from is affirmed, appellant to pay all costs. Affirmed.