Delpit v. Delpit
Delpit v. Delpit, 94 So. 2d 660 (La. 1957).
Cited by
- Rachal v. Stacy 480 So. 2d 510 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
- Simon v. Knipmeyer 417 So. 2d 399 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
- Modern Appliance & Supply, Inc. v. Sapp 200 So. 2d 363 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
- Garrison v. Kuntz 166 So. 2d 295 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
- Rex Finance Co. v. Morehead 124 So. 2d 776 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1960
- Alice v. Woods 124 So. 2d 770 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1960
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- Perkins v. Buchler 223 La. 179
Opinion text
HAWTHORNE, Justice. At the time set for argument of this appeal attorney for the appellant appeared solely for the purpose of informing the court that no briefs would be filed in support of the appeal and that the case would not be argued. Appellant in- this case has thus not pointed out any error in the judgment of the -lower- court. It is well settled that under these circumstances *541 the judgment may he affirmed under the presumption that it is correct. See Perkins v. Buchler, 223 La. 179 , 65 So.2d 130 , and numerous authorities there cited. We have nevertheless examined the record and find no error of law or fact in the judgment. The judgment is therefore affirmed, appellant to pay all costs.