Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Lott, 574 So. 2d 417.

29 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Terrance Malik Dangerfield La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2025
The trial court denied the motion, (La.
State of Louisiana Versus Isaiah Doyle La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2021
State of Louisiana v. Trevonte Lamarque Talbert La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2021
Moreover, “[t]he fact that the defendant’s capacity to proceed is called into question does not, for that reason alone, require the trial court to order a mental examination of the defendant.” [ ( ]La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Darrin Kashy Duhon -Aka- Darrin Duhon La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
Moreover, “[t}he fact that the defendant’s capacity to proceed is called into question does not, for that reason alone, require the trial court to order a mental examination of the defendant.” **4 La.App.
State v. Duhon 224 So. 3d 1 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
Moreover, “[t]he fact that the defendant’s capacity to proceed is called into question does not, for that reason alone, require the trial court to order a mental examination of the defendant.” **4 [ (]La.App.
State v. Barbain 179 So. 3d 770 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
[State v.] Lott, [ (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Harold Dewayne Baylor, Sr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
State v. Carter 84 So. 3d 499 La. 2012
State v. Odenbaugh 82 So. 3d 215 La. 2011
State of Louisiana v. Richard W. Black La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
Moreover, “[t]he fact that the defendant’s capacity to proceed is called into question does not, for that reason alone, require the trial court to order a mental examination of the defendant.” (La.App.
State v. Black 33 So. 3d 1025 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Moreover, “[t]he fact that the defendant’s capacity to proceed is called into question does not, for that reason alone, require the trial court to order a mental examination of the defendant.” (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. John Joseph Normand La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
Moreover, “[t]he fact that the defendant’s capacity to proceed is called into question does not, for that reason alone, require the trial court to order a mental examination of the defendant.” 3 (La.App.
State v. Normand 896 So. 2d 98 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
State v. Jason 820 So. 2d 1286 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
State v. Bridgewater 823 So. 2d 877 La. 2002
State v. Dorsey 796 So. 2d 135 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
State v. Turner 692 So. 2d 612 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
State v. Cyriak 684 So. 2d 42 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
State v. Ellis 677 So. 2d 617 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
State v. Hattaway 674 So. 2d 380 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
State v. Lott 671 So. 2d 1182 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
State v. Tatum 661 So. 2d 657 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
State v. McBroom 655 So. 2d 705 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
1732 , 48 L.Ed.2d 198 (1976); writ denied (1991).
State v. Green 632 So. 2d 1187 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
State v. Hopkins 626 So. 2d 820 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
State v. Jeffers 623 So. 2d 882 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
Stapleton v. Great Lakes Chemical Corp. 616 So. 2d 1311 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
2906 , 90 L.Ed.2d 992 (1986); (La.App.
State v. Tyler 607 So. 2d 910 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
State v. Lott 580 So. 2d 666 La. 1991
Prior report: La.App., .