Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Haltom v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 588 So. 2d 792.

29 citing documents.

Mallory Wartelle v. Louisiana Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance Company St. Landry Parish, Louisiana Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
Charles Higgins v. Louisiana Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance Company La. 2021
Halphen v. Borja 961 So. 2d 1201 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
Mitchell v. Brown Builders 902 So. 2d 1288 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
Mayo v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. 869 So. 2d 96 La. 2004
Seither v. Winnebago Industries, Inc. 808 So. 2d 792 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
Brossett v. Progressive Ins. Co. 801 So. 2d 668 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
Nicholas v. Allstate Ins. Co. 765 So. 2d 1017 La. 2000
Livas v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. 797 So. 2d 694 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
Clavier v. Roberts 755 So. 2d 977 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
Gladney v. Sneed 742 So. 2d 642 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
URCA Rules 2-12.4, 1-3; (La.App.
Magnon v. Collins 739 So. 2d 191 La. 1999
Taylor v. Rowell 736 So. 2d 812 La. 1999
Taylor v. Sider 714 So. 2d 783 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
Armand v. Rhodes 685 So. 2d 546 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
Armand v. Rhodes 685 So. 2d 546 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
Smith v. Boothe 669 So. 2d 682 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
Stevens v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 663 So. 2d 543 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
Bamburg v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. 647 So. 2d 447 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
Vallo v. Gayle Oil Co., Inc. 646 So. 2d 859 La. 1994
Shackelford v. STATE FARM MUT. AUTO. INS. 646 So. 2d 1209 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1994
1st Cir.1992), writs denied, (La.App.
Iles v. American Mfrs. Mut. Ins. Co. 640 So. 2d 451 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
Co., the Louisiana Legislature passed Act No. 233 in 1988 (adding Section (D)(1)(e) to this statute) specifically "to keep vehicle owners from carrying UM coverage on only one of two or more owned vehicles, thus obtaining the benefit of UM coverage regardless of which vehicle they occupied, at the cos
Fontenot v. FARM BUREAU INS. COMPANIES 629 So. 2d 495 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
Primeaux v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 624 So. 2d 1294 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
1st Cir.1992), writs denied, (La.App.
Sandoz v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. 620 So. 2d 441 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
Jones v. Allstate Ins. Co. 619 So. 2d 111 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
In a at 795 (La.App., 2nd Cir., 1991), the Second Circuit Court of Appeal discusses the rationale for this provision: However, the amendment to the UM statute was clearly designed to keep vehicle owners from carrying UM coverage on only one of two or more owned vehicles, thus obtaining the benefit of UM coverage regardless
Galliano v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co. 606 So. 2d 580 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1992
1st Cir.1992), writs denied, (La.App.
Roadrunner Motor Rebuilders, Inc. v. Ryan 603 So. 2d 214 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
Big River Const. v. UNIVERSITY CLUB I ARTS. 598 So. 2d 542 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by