DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Sturdivant, 669 So. 2d 654.

30 citing documents.

  • State of Louisiana v. Sidney Myers La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2025
    App. 2 Cir. 2/28/96), (a parent, while receiving a school tour, made sexual comments to a 13-year-old and then groped her); (La.
  • State of Louisiana v. Eric Wayne Lemay La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
    2 Cir. 2/28/96), (citation omitted).
  • State of Louisiana v. Hugh Gilliam La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2022
    App. 2 Cir. 2/28/96), (a parent, while receiving a school tour, made sexual comments to a 13-year-old and then groped her); (La.
  • State of Louisiana Versus Anthony L. Lane La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2021
    App. 2 Cir. 2/28/96); ).
  • State of Louisiana v. Fahim A. Shaikh 236 So. 3d 1206 La. 2017
    App. 2 Cir. 2/28/96), (a parent, while receiving a school tour, made sexual comments to a 13-year-old and then groped her); (La.
  • State v. Breedlove 213 So. 3d 1195 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
  • State v. Domangue 119 So. 3d 690 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
  • State v. Lirette 102 So. 3d 801 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
  • State of Louisiana v. Terry L. Cooley La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
    2 Cir. 2/28/96), -59 (citations omitted) (emphasis added), the second circuit mentioned that lewd and lascivious conduct should be construed within the context of facts of the case: 17 The word “lewd” means lustful, indecent and signifies that form of
  • State v. Cooley 87 So. 3d 285 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    App. 2 Cir. 2/28/96), -59 (citations omitted) (emphasis added), the second circuit mentioned that lewd and lascivious conduct should be construed within the context of facts of the case: haThe word “lewd” means lustful, indecent and signifies that form of immorality which relates to sexual impurity carried on in a wanton manner.
  • State v. Fisher 40 So. 3d 1020 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    2 Cir. 2/28/96), ; State v. Davis, 97-331 (La.App.
  • State of Louisiana v. Todd Andrew Jones La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
  • State v. Jones 32 So. 3d 1084 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
  • Newton v. Berry 15 So. 3d 262 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
  • State of Louisiana v. Henry Bryan Lowe La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    2 Cir. 2/28/96), “[t]he word ‘lewd’ means lustful, indecent and signifies that form of immorality which relates to sexual impurity carried on in a wanton manner,” and “[t]he word ‘lascivious’ means tending to incite lust, indecent, obscene and tending to deprave the morals in respect to sexual
  • State v. Lowe 999 So. 2d 194 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    2 Cir. 2/28/96), , "[t]he word `lewd' means lustful, indecent and signifies that form of immorality which relates to sexual impurity carried on in a wanton manner," and "[t]he word `lascivious' means tending to incite lust, indecent, obscene and tending to deprave the morals in respect to sexual relations."
  • State v. Robinson 975 So. 2d 853 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
  • State v. Robinson 975 So. 2d 853 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
  • State of Louisiana v. W.D.F., Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    2 Cir. 2/28/96), and State v. Teague, 04-1132 (La.App.
  • State of Louisiana v. Darrel Brent Whatley La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    2 Cir. 2/28/96), “[t]he word ‘lewd’ means lustful, indecent and signifies that form of immorality which relates to sexual impurity carried on in a wanton manner,” and “[t]he word ‘lascivious’ means tending to incite lust, indecent, obscene and tending to deprave the morals in respect to sexual relations.” These are
  • State v. Whatley 943 So. 2d 601 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    2 Cir. 2/28/96), , "[t]he word `lewd' means lustful, indecent and signifies that form of immorality which relates to sexual impurity carried on in a wanton manner," and "[t]he word `lascivious' means tending to incite lust, indecent, obscene and tending to deprave the morals in respect to sexual relations."
  • State v. Dorsey 939 So. 2d 608 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
    State v. Sturdivant, 27,680 (La.App.2d Cir.2/28/96), ; State v. Bugbee, 34,524 (La.App.2d Cir.2/28/01), .
  • State v. Lande 934 So. 2d 280 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
  • State v. Houston 925 So. 2d 690 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
  • State v. Bugbee 781 So. 2d 748 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
    [7] State v. Sturdivant, 27,680 (La.App.2d Cir.2/28/96), ; State v. Stec, 99-633 (La.App.
  • State v. Mickens 731 So. 2d 463 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
    3d Cir.), writ denied, (1993); see also, State v. Sturdivant, 27,680 (La.App.2d Cir.2/28/96), .
  • State v. Miller 718 So. 2d 960 La. 1998
    2nd Cir.2/28/96), (14-year-old's testimony that when she was six defendant persuaded her to enter vacant house and touched her "private parts" was relevant in prosecution for indecent behavior with 13-year-old;" evidence showed defendant's intent to molest, fondle or touch young girls and that such touching was not accidental ...
  • State v. Frith 711 So. 2d 388 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
    2d Cir.1988); and State v. Sturdivant, 27,680 (La.App.2d Cir. 2/28/96), .
  • State v. Lisotta 712 So. 2d 527 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
    See, e.g., State v. Sturdivant, 27,680 (La.App.2d Cir 2/28/96), ; (La.App.
  • State v. Stepp 686 So. 2d 76 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
    State v. Sturdivant, 27,680 (La.App.2d Cir. 2/28/96), .