Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Abbott, 697 So. 2d 636.

15 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Jaime Brooks Day La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
2 Cir. 6/18/97), writ denied, 97-1929 (La.
State v. Day 158 So. 3d 120 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
2 Cir. 6/18/97), , writ denied, 97-1929 (La.1/9/98), , the second circuit denied a defendant’s motion for an independent medical examination of the victim, which the defendant contended was necessary for his defense.
State v. Carper 107 So. 3d 118 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
The Louisiana Supreme Court, however, has found that the rule forbidding leading questions may “yield somewhat to the trial court’s discretion in the examination of young victims.” State v. Abbott, 29,497 (La.App.2d Cir.06/18/97), , writ denied, 97-1929 (La.01/09/98)
State v. GLAUB 66 So. 3d 1170 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
2 Cir. 6/18/97), , writ denied, 97-1929 (La.1/9/98), ; and State v. *1180 Vampran, (La.App.
State v. Morrison 999 So. 2d 1197 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
App.2d Cir.6/12/02), ; State v. Abbott, 29,497 (La.App.2d Cir.6/18/97), .
State v. D.M.J. 996 So. 2d 413 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
2d Cir.06/18/97), , writ denied, 97-1929 (La.01/09/98), , or to elicit specific details from a young victim to clarify an earlier statement.
State v. DMJ 996 So. 2d 413 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
App. 2d Cir.06/18/97), , writ denied, 97-1929 (La.01/09/98), , or to elicit specific details from a young victim to clarify an earlier statement.
State v. Roberts 966 So. 2d 111 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
2d Cir.6/18/97), , writ denied, 97-1929 (La.1/9/98)
State v. Kennedy 957 So. 2d 757 La. 2007
2 Cir. 6/18/97), -41 (admission of videotape of interview between child victim and police officer does not violate confrontation principles when child and interlocutor both testify); -49 (La.
State v. Watson 900 So. 2d 325 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
State v. Isaac, supra ; See State v. Abbott, 29,497 (La.App.2d Cir.6/18/97), , writ denied, XXXX-XXXX (La.1/9/98), .
State v. Guerra 834 So. 2d 1206 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
The state concludes that the defendant's confrontation rights were not violated by the admission of out-of-court interviews when both the victim and the interviewing officer testified at trial and were subject to cross-examination, citing State v. Abbott, 29,497 (La.App.2d Cir.6/18/97), , writ denied, XXXX-XXXX (La.1/9/98), .
State v. Zornes 774 So. 2d 1062 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
App.2d Cir.6/18/97), ; (La.App.
State v. Thomas 711 So. 2d 808 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
State v. Abbott, 29,497 (La.App.2d Cir. 06/18/97), .
State v. Hubbard 708 So. 2d 1099 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
State v. Sloan 701 So. 2d 995 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
State v. Abbott, 29,497 (La.App.2d Cir. 6/18/97), ; State v. Baker, 28,152 (La.App.2d Cir. 5/8/96), .