Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Brittain v. Family Care Services, Inc., 801 So. 2d 457.

27 citing documents.

Todd Morein, Et Ux. v. Acme Land Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
Patricia Sasser-Ford v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
2 Cir. 6/20/01), the court stated: Even though the summary judgment procedure is favored, it is not a substitute for trial and is often inappropriate for judicial determination of subjective facts such as moti
Sasser-Ford v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. 112 So. 3d 968 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
2 Cir. 6/20/01), , the court stated: Even though the summary judgment procedure is favored, it is not a substitute for trial and is often inappropriate for judicial determination of subjective facts such as motive, intent, good faith or knowledge.
Ultra Pure Water Technologies, Inc. v. Standex International Corp. D/B/A Master-Bilt La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
Blake Plauche v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
Ultra Pure Water Technologies, Inc. v. Standex International Corp. 89 So. 3d 1282 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
James Joseph Keyes, Jr. v. Allison Thibodeaux La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
Keyes v. Thibodeaux 85 So. 3d 1284 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Dr. Harry Kleinman v. William Patrick Bennett La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
2 Cir. 6/20/01), ), this court stated the following principals by which we are guided: Even though the summary judgment procedure is favored, it is not a substitute for trial and is often inappropriate for judicial determination of subjective facts such as motive, intent, good faith or knowledge.
Kleinman v. Bennett 80 So. 3d 689 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
2 Cir. 6/20/01), ), this court stated the following principals by which we are guided: Even though the summary judgment procedure is favored, it is not a substitute for trial and is often inappropriate for judicial determination of subjective facts such as motive, intent, good faith or knowledge.
R. Chadwick Edwards, Jr. v. Larose Scrap & Salvage, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
2 Cir. 6/20/01), : Even though the summary judgment procedure is favored, it is not a substitute for trial and is often inappropriate for judicial determination of subjective facts such as motive, intent, good faith or knowledge.
Edwards v. Larose Scrap & Salvage, Inc. 52 So. 3d 1009 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
2 Cir. 6/20/01), , 460: Even though the summary judgment procedure is favored, it is not a substitute for trial and is often inappropriate for judicial determination of subjective facts such as motive, intent, good faith or knowledge.
Jane Doe v. Scott M. Hawkins La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
Doe v. Hawkins 42 So. 3d 1000 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Maggie Sepulvado Manshack v. Mary Garcia Kershaw La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
2 Cir. 6/20/01), the court stated: Even though the summary judgment procedure is favored, it is not a substitute for trial and is often inappropriate for judicial determination of subjective facts such as motive, intent, good faith or knowledge.
Marie Benniefiel v. Zurich American Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
2 Cir. 6/20/01), the court stated: Even though the summary judgment procedure is favored, it is not a substitute for trial and is often inappropriate for judicial determination of subjective facts such as motive, intent, good faith or knowledge.
Benniefiel v. Zurich American Insurance 10 So. 3d 381 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
2 Cir. 6/20/01), , the court stated: Even though the summary judgment procedure is favored, it is not a substitute for trial and is often inappropriate for judicial determination of subjective facts such as motive, intent, *385 good faith or knowledge.
Christal Suire v. Lcs Corrections Services, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Suire v. LCS Corrections Services, Inc. 930 So. 2d 221 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Berry v. City of Bossier City 911 So. 2d 333 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
Bell v. Gold Rush Casino 893 So. 2d 969 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
2 Cir. 6/20/01), , the court stated: Even though the summary judgment procedure is favored, it is not a substitute for trial and is often inappropriate for judicial determination of subjective facts such as motive, intent, good faith or knowledge.
Reginald James Bell v. the Gold Rush Casino and Om Operating, LLC La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
2 Cir. 6/20/01), the court stated: Even though the summary judgment procedure is favored, it is not a substitute for trial and is often inappropriate for judicial determination of subjective facts such as motive, intent, good faith or knowledge.
Howard Hebert v. Bill-Wood Limited Liability Company, D/B/A Billeaud Planters, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
2 Cir. 6/20/01), the court stated: Even though the summary judgment procedure is favored, it is not a substitute for trial and is often inappropriate for judicial determination of subjective facts such as motive, intent, good faith or knowledge.
Hebert v. Bill-Wood Ltd. Liability Co. 862 So. 2d 1227 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
2 Cir. 6/20/01), , the court stated: Even though the summary judgment procedure is favored, it is not a substitute for trial and is often inappropriate for judicial determination of subjective facts such as motive, intent, good faith or knowledge.
Pritchard v. AMERICAN FREIGHTWAYS CORP. 862 So. 2d 476 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
Klein v. Cisco-Eagle, Inc. 855 So. 2d 844 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
Allen v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Co., 36,377 (La.App.2d Cir.9/18/02), , writ denied, 02-2577 (La.12/19/02), , citing Brittain v. Family Care Services, Inc., 34,787 (La.App.2d Cir.6/20/01), ; Spears v. Jones, 00-2799 (La.App.
Allen v. State Farm Fire and Cas. Co. 828 So. 2d 190 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
2 Cir. 6/20/01), ; Spears v. Jones, 00-2799 (La.App.